hmmooo000

ehm

[hmmooo000 @hmmooo000]

@Eschatonicism @eusoueumain https://t.co/9RQcQwAePm

@eusoueumain add anything you want to/ correct me if you feel like it

[hmmooo000 @hmmooo000]

@Eschatonicism @eusoueumain worthless 👍

[hmmooo000 @hmmooo000]

@Eschatonicism @eusoueumain worthless 👍

[hmmooo000 @hmmooo000]

@Eschatonicism @eusoueumain "science" aren't at all convincing. Your dogshit ideology and it's mainstream proponents became irrelevant a long ass time ago lmfao keep up with the time buddy

[hmmooo000 @hmmooo000]

@Eschatonicism @eusoueumain neurophysiological makeup". Got any proof or do you plan on making baseless assertions all day instead of arguments? Why do you morons try so hard to be ""scientific"" racists? Just be racists openly you spineless idiot. I promise you bruh your pathetic attempts at hiding behind

[hmmooo000 @hmmooo000]

@jasonwblakely It is outright impossible to engage with "Critique of the Gotha Programme" or "Civil War in France" and still think that's the case. The "mass movement" that you describe has completely failed to overcome the bourgeois social relations ...6/6

[hmmooo000 @hmmooo000]

@jasonwblakely 3. https://t.co/MKagiXk10F "Socialism" (understood as the "mass movement" you're referring to here) hasn't changed the bourgeois social relations that Marx analysed extensively. Socialism isn't simply "the government doing things" https://t.co/pjhnHavRji

[Jason Blakely @jasonwblakely]

... socialism as any kind of mass movement today has conceded that to liberalism the need for elections, the respect for certain basic rights, and so forth. Similarly if we actually returned to virtue-ethics (MacIntyre) communities of practice form the transition (not militancy)

[hmmooo000 @hmmooo000]

@RegimeEnforcer @jon_stewartmill Never ask Pinker and his cronies to provide neuroanatomical evidence for any of their claims

[hmmooo000 @hmmooo000]

@Kondylise @adhee1673 You still haven't replied to this btw (Cartelier's critique being the exact one OP here is making/ very similar) lol

[R. J. Zacharias @OtterZacharias]

@Kondylise Under Sraffa, class structure is presupposed (see Cartelier arguing that Sraffa's surplus is only observable if wage-earners and entrepreneurs already exist as distinct classes) https://t.co/srT5FPMnFo

[hmmooo000 @hmmooo000]

@PureThe0ry @HolisticAbdi https://t.co/N0n8BgKj1q

yeah I'm good lol

[Arrow Insecurities @PureThe0ry]

@AbstrahetsMisha @adhee1673 This is the problem with Marxian value/price/exploitation. Here we have you saying that the point wasn’t to show the binding constraint of labor values on those magnitudes, and the other guy is confidently declaring it is. Ask 2 Marxists a question & get 3 answers

[hmmooo000 @hmmooo000]

@iron_redux @beverlymantle1 @biff_kev @SomeSomething22 "such that" I think

[hmmooo000 @hmmooo000]

@JuicyJuuce @Kholina54321 @AaronDent_ *specifically

[hmmooo000 @hmmooo000]

@JuicyJuuce @Kholina54321 @AaronDent_ theory of natural selection was "too favorable" towards capitalism? lmfao? any sources? are you sure your illiterate ass isn't conflating the theory of natural selection with how Darwin sepcifically framed "struggle for existence" (which was inspired by Thomas Malthus's

[hmmooo000 @hmmooo000]

@JuicyJuuce @Kholina54321 @AaronDent_ population theories)? do you have any idea what Marx's and Engels' critique of the use of that specific part by "Darwinists" was? when are you going to admit that all you know about ts comes from pop history?

[hmmooo000 @hmmooo000]

@GR1FF1NONE @ygzgzot "polylogism fallacy" cuz he used the term "bourgeois"???? LMFAOOOOOO you've no fucking arguments it's funny af