BREAKING: The lawyer who got FBI attorney Clinesmith's DC Bar license restored after convicted forging evidence to spy on Trump headed DC Bar Board on Professional Responsibility & now reps Board. "Eric Yaffe greased it for him with the Board," a source told me. "Major conflict."
This is what irritates the USCP about Steve Baker.
This agency has gone largely unscrutinized for decades.
These skeletons are buried deep in the closet, and there's never been any reason for anyone to go digging.
Until Steve got curious.
The Case of Captain Philip Marshall
The late United Airlines B-767 Captain Philip Marshall had published two books concerning the lies of 9/11 and was about to publish a third book. He told his neighbors that he was being threatened.
Shortly thereafter, his two teenage children and family dog were found shot to death in his family home and Philip had been shot in the head.
Police ruled it a murder/suicide...ie Philip had murdered his two children and the family dog before committing suicide.
Philip kept his book manuscript hidden in the house. It was missing.
The California Attorney General at the time never ordered a further criminal investigation into the matter. Her name was Kamala Harris, the current Vice President of the United States.
His two previous books published were:
The Big Bamboozle: 9/11 and the War on Terror
https://t.co/wl4OV8c2BW…
False Flag 911: How Bush, Cheney and the Saudis Created the Post-911 World https://t.co/xHj8fVoRhl…
This is a must-watch documentary on the event:
Unthinkable∶ An Airline Captain's Story - The Philip Marshall Case https://t.co/TrwyG0OW8A…
You be the judge.
In memory of Captain Marshall and his two children, it is requested that you help make this post go viral by reposting it.
As a 9/11 Pilot whistleblower, I am not suicidal.
What in tarnation is the CIA doing intervening for a US citizen (Hunter)?
Then again, Hunter worked at Burisma with ex CIA Coffer Black. And he worked at the NDI with Nina Jankowicz.
Anywho, scatter the CIA into the wind into a million pieces!
Brookings County SD begrudgingly allowed “election denier” Rick Weible 5 minutes to voice his concerns on election software being used.
It only took him 4 to drive a truck through their illusions of what they thought was a secure system.
I was asked this question recently by someone interested in why its 'bad to have Visual Studio installed on the voting machines'.
"Because you can use it to connect to the database and change one of the thousands of stored procedures/views at will without changing the app"
UPPERCUT DELIVERED AT SCOTUS!!
(Please retweet)
Kari Lake‘s case against machines in 2024 was dismissed by a federal court in Arizona on the grounds that it was “too speculative“. Ninth circuit upheld that absurd decision on appeal.
Last week Kari Lake/Kurt Olsen filed at SCOTUS an appeal.
Last NIGHT they filed the appendix with stunning new evidence. (found in the links below).
Here are some key points:
1. Maricopa County’s election software used in the 2020 and 2022 elections has been altered with respect to the machine behavior settings that govern how ballots are read and tabulated.
2. The EAC never approved this altered software, and Maricopa’s many previous representations that this election software is EAC certified, including to the AZ Senate, are false.
3. Knowingly modifying election software without approval or certification pursuant to 16-442 is a felony under AZ law. See 16–1004(B).
4. Dominion’s operative contract with Maricopa states “Data generated by the Democracy Suite Platform, including results reporting, is protected by the deployment of FIPS approved symmetric AES encryption.”
5. But, Dominion placed the master cryptographic keys in plain text and unprotected on the election database except for Windows-login, which are easily bypassed. Leaving these highly sensitive cryptographic keys in this state violates all cyber security protocols and allows a malicious actor to take control of the machine and change results without detection.
6. As Mr. Cotton stated in his declaration “It is like a bank having the most secure vault in the world, touting how secure it is to the public and then taping the combination in large font type on the wall next to the vault door.”
7. Given all of these findings, none of these machines can be trusted to give reliable results in 2024.
For those wondering about Hunter's jailed business partner Jason Galanis - and the Native American Bond offering - here's the background (long post):
Galanis & Devon Archer were involved in a 2014 scheme involving a Native American Tribal bond offering. We’ve always wondered why Hunter Biden was never caught up in this scandal - particularly because he was a close partner with Archer - and because their broker-dealer firm, Rosemont Seneca, was effectively sold to Burnham Financial as part of the larger deal.
Apparently Galanis has the same questions: "Galanis testified he believed the federal "prosecution strategy was intended to protect Hunter Biden and, ultimately, Vice President Biden."
In late Spring 2015, the SEC was alerted to a series of suspicious transactions involving Devon Archer and Rosemont Seneca by a Wall Street whistleblower employed at Morgan Stanley. Indeed, it’s documents from the whistleblower - which appear to highlight Hunter’s involvement - that make it all the more suspicious that it was only Archer who caught the eye of the feds.
Archer was originally convicted in June 2018 along with Galanis and Bevan Cooney. But unlike Galanis and Cooney, Archer had his conviction overturned by US District Judge Ronnie Abrams, an Obama appointee who just so-happened to be married to Mueller special counsel prosecutor Greg Andres. At the time, Judge Abrams said she was “left with an unwavering concern that Archer is innocent of the crimes charged.” Judge Abrams’ decision was reversed on appeal and Archer was sentenced to a year and one day in prison.
It looks like that sentence was lenient. As court documents make clear, the Tribal Bond scheme consisted of four parts:
1) convincing the Wakpamni Lake Community Corporation to issue the Tribal Bonds;
2) engineering the Tribal Bond issuances to give Galanis and his associates undisclosed control over the Tribal Bond proceeds;
3) securing victims to purchase the Tribal Bonds; and
4) misappropriating the Tribal Bond proceeds for the benefit of Galanis and his associates, including the Archer and the other Defendants.
One of the first steps in their scheme was the purchase of two small asset managers - Hughes Capital Management and Atlantic Asset Management - using a subsidiary of their newly created financial roll-up vehicle, Burnham Financial. The total purchase price was small - just a couple million dollars. But with the purchase came a customer base of managed assets that was large enough to be illegally used to purchase the bond deal.
Meanwhile, the Native American tribal corporation, the Wakpamni Lake Community Corporation, was convinced to issue three tranches of tribal bonds. This was done in part by providing a falsified annuity contract that the tribe believed contained the funds necessary to pay off the bonds at maturity - and allow for several new development projects for the tribe. But the annuity was actually worthless. It had been issued by an asset-less holding company controlled by Galanis and his associates.
It was all a fraud. The proceeds from the bond deal had gone to Galanis, Archer and his associates and the annuity had no invested funds. In total there were three tranches of Tribal Bonds that were issued: $27 million in August 2014; $20 million in September 2014; and $16 million in April 2015. The first and last issuances directly defrauded clients of their newly purchased asset managers who were used as unwitting purchasers of those bonds by Galanis, Archer and the rest of the group.
But Galanis, Archer and their associates purchased the second offering of $20 million themselves in a process known as “recycling”- using proceeds from the first bond deal to do so. As before, they siphoned off the majority of this money too - once again using another fictitious annuity contract. As court documents note, the point of this recycling scheme was to “use the bonds as currency in various transactions, including to [fraudulently] bolster Burnham Securities' net capital,” thereby making Burnham appear more financially sound than it was.
Remember that Hunter held a sizable stake in Burnham along w/Archer & Galanis. On paper the bonds appeared to be worth at least $20 million - a seemingly real asset that could be sold to other investors. But in reality, Archer and his group were holding $20 million in worthless bonds on their books. They needed to sell them to another investor before their scheme unraveled.
According to an internal Morgan Stanley presentation, their Municipal trading desk was approached on or about December 2014 regarding the possible purchase of a sizable tranche of non-rated municipal bonds that were issued only three months earlier on Sept 12, 2014. This was the second $20 million trance that Archer purchased through his company, RSB, using the proceeds from the first bond offering to do so.
Morgan Stanley assigned a High Yield credit analyst to analyze the bonds for possible purchase for their trading desk. They immediately saw many red flags. As a result, Morgan Stanley passed on the purchase of Archer’s bonds in Dec. 2014. But it also appears that they continued to evaluate the structure and unusual genesis of the bonds for the next five months - getting increasingly disconcerted as they did so.
This bond offering was a true private placement - so illiquid that the bonds had never even traded to this point. Another notable item was the price at which Archer and his group were carrying the bonds on their books. Archer’s company had the bonds marked in RSB’s portfolio at 111 - a shockingly high valuation for a brand new issue. For perspective, in bond parlance, par value - which is normally also the new issue price - is 100. To have illiquid bonds that had been issued just three months earlier trading at these kinds of lofty levels is simply unheard of.
It’s clear what happened. Archer and his associates had marked the bonds up substantially in their portfolio in the intervening 2-3 months based on zero trades - almost certainly as a means of making their investors believe the new bonds were valuable - when in fact they were worthless. If there are any holders of the portfolio beyond the seller (as there was in this case), this is illegal in its own right.
Although they were carrying the bonds at 111% of par, according to Morgan Stanley they were initially willing to sell the bonds around par but very quickly dropped their asking price to 80 - with indications they would be willing to go even lower. It’s hard to impress on someone outside the business just how out of bounds this is. No wonder Morgan Stanley found themselves alarmed.
Morgan Stanley likely became even more alarmed when they began to examine the transaction structure, it's highly complex and involves offshore holding companies. Money is moving about - ultimately in circular fashion back to Archer, Galanis and their associates. Morgan Stanley had pretty quickly figured out the "recycling scheme." There was also a Ponzi Scheme at play for good measure as Galanis continued to scrounge up new proceeds to pay interest on the older bonds.
Archer has said he "was not paying enough attention" and didn’t realize what was happening. That seems an implausible claim. Given the use of his personal company to channel funds, it's hard to accept that he was unaware all of this was highly illegal.
We would also argue that the same logic would apply to Hunter - although he has always denied any involvement in the transactions. Hunter was Archer’s long-time partner - and both men seemed to be involved in every facet of the others’ business.
In a Burnham slide on the ongoing consolidations, there is the line “H. Biden broker dealer tuck-under enhances relationships.” There is also an email from Archer to Hunter in July 2014 where Archer tells Hunter “a consolidated Burnham which would buy our BD [broker dealer] as a subsequent, what we’re calling, “strategic H Biden tuck in.” Hunter responded, “Looks like a great plan.”
It's always puzzled us why there was no concurrent focus by the SEC on Hunter. We know that Hunter received a subpoena from the SEC on the tribal bonds matter in March 2016 but that seems to be where things ended. Hunter is never mentioned again. Why was Archer the only one singled out?
Judging from the Morgan Stanley analysis of the bonds, it appears they agreed. They went to notable trouble of singling out Hunter and placed his biography prominently above Archer’s in their analysis of the bond deal.
We also know that Hunter was sent an email from Eric Schwerin on May 11, 2016 after the criminal complaint by the SEC and a concurrent Wall Street Journal article were both released that same day. Schwerin wrote, “There are no allegations you had anything to do with this, only that you do business together. Still not good but not sure how we push back without inviting more questions."
Make of that what you will.
Dems wildly underestimated Bobulinski, who came across as the smartest guy in the room. They weren't expecting that to be the case.
They also weren't expecting that Bobulinski would refuse to play by their rules. Goldman literally panics starting at the 0:54 mark.
BREAKING: O’Keefe sits down with Pentagon Official “Aidan Grey” and shows him a Netflix-style episode featuring himself on hidden camera discussing open borders and banning guns, as if in a ‘Black Mirror’ episode.
More Insiders at @DeptofDefense have come forward with documents from Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS) showing Pentagon employees can change their name to whatever they want. Our insider believes this is a potential risk in not being able to identify who people truly are.
In response to the video of the Pentagon official advocating bringing in the National Guard to “repeal the 2nd amendment and take all the guns away,” insiders have leaked documents from culture surveys within The Defense Organizational Climate Survey (DEOCS). The survey shows all employees at DOD have to enter their unique ID and disclose personal information on their stance on Second Amendment Rights which is raising major concerns. Our source believes this is a way for the DoD to track and target conservative Americans working at the DoD.
The insiders will appear ON THE INSIDE 4-6 ET.
FULL STORY BELOW…
BREAKING: A tale of two Dominion employees. Which one is telling the truth about voting systems being connected to the internet? Looks like @realMikeLindell has been right all along. Our voting systems ARE connected to the internet. Internet connections result in security vulnerabilities that are exacerbated when Dominion leaves decryption keys in plain text files on their election servers. Time to remove the machines and return to transparent #HandCounts.
https://t.co/Nr7YvS4NgG