#CyberSecurity course in Nigeria is not cheap especially when you have to combine other certifications from world bodies like @ECCOUNCIL@CompTIA to become a CEH. Thank you @USADF and @LSETF for this opportunity.
Finding a research gap is the most challenging task.
Here is an easy way to find research gap in 10 minutes.
1➝ Go to https://t.co/WVNvexKshP
2➝ From menu, select 𝐺𝑎𝑡𝑠𝑏𝑖 𝑖𝑛𝑛𝑜𝑣𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑟.
3➝ Enter your generic research topic
4➝ @Gatsbi_AI generates list of concrete topics
5➝ Select the concrete research topic
6➝ Gatsbi will identify the related research gaps
Do the following with each research gap.
✦ Check the star rating of the gap
✦ Check references associated with the gap
✦ Expand the gap to see its details
Try it today for FREE: https://t.co/WVNvexKshP
@Waspapping_ https://t.co/yL4MUdnXdM.
Israel currently has nuke but Saudi never said it will get one for balance of power. Speak to facts instead spewing rants
Iranian doctors say that during last month's deadly crackdown on nationwide protests, security agents swarmed hospitals in multiple cities, hunting for wounded protesters.
Nigerians 🇳🇬 wish they’d also get this kind of support Iranians are receiving from the USA 🇺🇸 to help us crush banditry, insurgency, and endless killings.
#Iran#Israel#US
@Waspapping_ being blind to the terror act in your own country 🇳🇬 is the height of foolishness and irreversible stupidity, @Waspapping_ abi what’s your name
I am following the discussion online about cross examination by lawyers in the light of Davido’s recent unpleasant experience in court during a custody hearing.
I will share just two past experiences.
Be patient.
A couple of years ago, I cross examined a medical doctor who came to court to give evidence in a divorce petition in support of the Respondent (the woman).
We were for the Petitioner (the man).
Our client’s petition was grounded on adultery.
In the petition, we joined the woman’s Pastor and her Policeman friend as Co-Respondents (a co-respondent is the person with whom the respondent committed adultery).
My client had records of very explicit and salacious conversations between his then wife and the two co-respondents. The evidence was compelling.
The idea that women are better at hiding their tracks when they cheat only works when a man doesn’t know how to catch and expose a cheating partner.
I digress.
In her cross petition, the Respondent accused my client of being “controlling”, “insecure”, and “physically abusive”.
She further alleged that she lost her “pregnancy” due to domestic violence.
My client vehemently denied these claims and insisted that his then wife was never pregnant.
To prove her case, the woman called a medical doctor as a witness to speak to her bogus claims of pregnancy and miscarriage.
Looking at the medical report, I found the report manifestly unreliable and waited patiently for cross examination.
The first red flag was that the doctor in her report stated the age/duration of the pregnancy without conducting a scan.
The woman didn’t have evidence that a laboratory test was done to confirm the pregnancy either.
But the doctor, who claimed she treated her after the purported miscarriage, had the audacity to issue a questionable report stating the duration of the pregnancy and still came to court to testify for the woman.
What transpired in court after the cross examination amused me.
The doctor, who claimed to be an admirer of my work, was openly and loudly hostile towards me when the proceedings ended. She yelled and accused me of disgracing her and being mean to her.
I had to walk away.
Before then, I had another experience with a senior police officer who was the Acting Commissioner of Police in Akwa Ibom at the time. This man arrested protesters and charged them with attempted suicide just because they protested in front of the Government House in Uyo.
When my colleague met with him in the hope of resolving the case out of court, the officer insisted that he will only do so on the condition that I must apologize to him and publish the apology in a Newspaper for publicly condemning his actions against the protesters.
This senior policeman boasted that if I fail to apologize, he will personally attend the trial in his full police uniform and testify as a witness. In his words, “let me see the court that will not convict them”.
True to his words, the policeman came to the court in his regalia as the Acting Commissioner of Police and gave evidence against the protesters. He was so full of himself during his Evidence-in-Chief.
Under cross examination, I started by asking him when he joined the police.
I then intentionally asked him questions that embarrassed him.
The summary is that the policeman hurriedly exited the court premises under heavy rain and couldn’t wait for his orderly who had stepped out of bring umbrella. Seeing him soaked in rain while ‘fleeing’ the court excited my protesting clients.
Cross examination has a way of humbling even the most intelligent and mendacious people. You may think you’re the best liar in the universe until you are subjected to the fire of cross-examination.