To change your programming you have to actually know you're a program and most people simply don't.
Most people see the world through their model and mistake that model for actual, intrinsic reality.
They’re running a fixed and inflexible program, like a NPC in a video game.
"The hotel, officially set to open its doors in 2027, will see robots occupy every hospitality role, including reception, room service, cleaning, food preparation and guest support."
Milton Friedman's greatest regret.
The federal government discovered the perfect crime in 1943: make employers collect taxes before workers ever see their paychecks. You think you earn $60,000 per year, but you actually earn $75,000 and hand over $15,000 to politicians without ever touching it. The psychological difference is enormous.
Before payroll withholding, Americans wrote quarterly checks directly to the Treasury. Picture yourself sitting at your kitchen table, writing a $3,750 check to the IRS every three months. The pain was immediate and visceral. Politicians faced constant pressure to justify every dollar because citizens felt the extraction in real time.
Withholding transforms this concrete loss into an abstract accounting entry. Your employer becomes an unpaid tax collector, and you never experience the actual cost of government. Worse, most people celebrate their tax refunds as government generosity rather than recognizing them as interest-free loans they provided to politicians. The Treasury collects your money throughout the year, spends it immediately, then returns your own cash and receives gratitude.
This system enables the explosion in government spending you witness today. Defense contractors billing $640 for toilet seats, agricultural subsidies for corn syrup, and congressional salaries for 535 people who rarely show up to work. When taxation feels painless, voters stop demanding accountability for how their money gets spent.
Milton Friedman helped design withholding as a wartime emergency measure and later called it his greatest regret. Free market economists recognized that the psychological pain of direct taxation creates political pressure for fiscal restraint. The temporary always becomes permanent in government hands, and the emergency justification disappears while the extraction mechanism remains forever.
I think there is a word for this behavior in UK police guidelines right?
Ohh right, it’s called racism.
“Deliver “equality of outcomes” by treating people differently based on race,needs,experiences”
Woke policing killed Henry Nowak.
Just look at the 6 anti-racism “commitments”:
1. Take a stand against racism in all forms
2. Proactively identify & tackle “racial inequalities”
3. Reform policies that over-police or under-protect certain groups
4. Partner with others to fix societal racial gaps
5. Deliver “equality of outcomes” by treating people differently based on race,needs,experiences
6. Show transparency, leadership & measure anti-racism impact
Translation:
>do not treat everyone equally under the law
>explicitly reject colour-blind policing
>respond based on skin color and “lived experience” to engineer equal results
The police at the scene did exactly that and the outcome was an absolute tragedy.
Suicidal empathy isn’t the core threat, it’s homicidal empathy.
What we’re witnessing isn’t misguided kindness. It’s a ruthless, ideologically driven strategy of reproductive suppression and lineage destruction, fueled by feminist intrasexual competition. Certain strains of feminism don’t just compete with men, they indoctrinate women to sabotage their own fertility, demonize traditional family structures, and actively undermine the reproductive success of rival women and lineages. The result is civilizational self-harm dressed as empowerment.
If you watch only one thing this week, watch Hannah Spier’s interview with evolutionary psychologist Dr. Dani Sulikowski.
It’s brilliant, unflinching, and genuinely terrifying. Sulikowski lays out how modern feminism functions as an intrasexual competitive strategy, one that suppresses motherhood, distorts mating preferences, and accelerates fertility collapse under the banner of “equality.”
Feminism, in this form, has proven every bit as destructive to human flourishing and societal stability as Marxism. Both ideologies weaponize grievance, promise utopia, and deliver demographic and cultural ruin.
@hannahspierMD
The price we are paying no longer matches the value we’re receiving.
This is true for almost everything. Services, products, food, education…the whole fckn economy is one giant overpriced slop.
The human body became a software engineering problem the minute CRISPR arrived. Now, AI writes better code than humans, with every disease becoming a potential coding challenge.
⚡️The middle class is where the system hides its extraction because the middle class still believes obedience will be rewarded.
The poor are visibly dependent.
The rich are structurally insulated.
The middle class is trapped inside the moral contract of responsibility.
Work hard. Pay taxes. Buy insurance. Save for retirement. Don’t cheat. Don’t default. Don’t complain. Don’t take too much. Don’t fall behind. Keep your credit clean. Keep your kids on track. Keep your career moving. Keep the mortgage paid. Keep smiling.
Then the system taxes that obedience.
The middle class is easy to extract from because its income is visible, its behavior is predictable, and its fear of falling is powerful.
W-2 income can be captured before it ever reaches the bank account.
Property taxes attach to shelter. Healthcare attaches to employment. College aid disappears once income crosses thresholds. Tax credits phase out. Professional licensing, insurance, childcare, commuting, housing, and retirement all become toll booths.
The rich escape through structure.
The poor survive through assistance.
The middle pays retail.
That is why it feels like the most expensive place to live. It is the zone where you make enough to be denied help and not enough to buy freedom. You are too “successful” for sympathy and too exposed for security.
This is also why the middle-class anger is going to grow. These people are the stabilizing class. They follow rules, raise kids, pay bills, fund municipalities, staff companies, buy homes, carry insurance pools, and keep institutions functioning. When they start realizing the bargain no longer compounds, political trust breaks hard.
The deepest betrayal is that income stopped being the path to safety. Asset ownership became the path to safety. The middle class earns income to buy assets, but asset prices keep moving away because monetary policy, debt, housing restriction, financialization, and investor demand pushed the ladder higher. So the worker runs faster while the asset-owner floats.
That is the hidden class split.
The middle class is not poor enough to receive the system’s mercy and not rich enough to command its architecture. It is the payer class. The compliance class. The full-price class.
Bottom line:
The middle class is expensive because it is where responsibility gets monetized.
The system extracts most efficiently from people who still believe playing by the rules will save them.
Bro-science dressed up in mechanistic language :)
Actually, Tesamorelin and Ipamorelin both elevate GH. Tesamorelin via GHRH receptor agonism, Ipamorelin via ghrelin receptor.
GH itself is lipolytic (HSL activation, reduced LPL activity) and anabolic (IGF-1 mediated). These aren’t separate arms that conflict, they are downstream of the same pulse. GH doesnt pick a lane.
Theoretically you would be right when elevated FFA from lipolysis could suppress insulin sensitivity->impair glucose uptake->limit mTOR-driven protein synthesis. This is true at supraphysiological GH doses at 4–10 IU/day. Not for peptide-stimulated pulses.
A very sad announcement.
I have just been convicted a second time for 'hate speech' and it is only due to a technicality that I could not immediately be sent to jail —to the judge's frustration.
In an ironic turn of events it's actually thanks to my previous prison sentence (for memes in a private group chat) that I am now still free —in a physical sense, at least.
Call me naive but I didn't think they would take it this far, given that this precedent criminalises many of the arguments used by even the most moderate politicians critical of mass migration.
In February 2024 I gave a lecture at Catholic University Leuven wherein I linked mass migration to crime and a deterioration of our quality of life. Every single point I made was 100% the truth and based on scientific evidence.
Cynically, even the judge that convicted me admits as much by writing in his verdict: “Even if all of the statements made by Van Langenhove are based on scientific evidence and statistics, it makes no difference to the criminal intent. Van Langenhove is not charged with spreading false information. He is charged with presenting facts in a way that incites hatred against persons on the grounds of one or more of the protected criteria in the Anti-Racism Law.”
That's a lot of words just to say he wants to send me to prison for speaking the truth.
Even the regime media write: "It did not matter to the court that Van Langenhove was quoting scientific sources. The judge argued that Van Langenhove's main message was that a big part of the societal problems like insecurity, housing shortages and lowering educational standards are due to mass migration."
You may think the regime media are being sympathetic to me in the first sentence, but in reality they are warning people: even if you speak the truth, if you go against our narrative, we will crush you in every way possible.
Both the public prosecutor and the judge did not present a single real argument as to how or against whom I would have incited hatred. So even if I would accept their crazy, dystopic law, I still did not break it.
The only argument they present is that I created a "hostile atmosphere of us versus them” in regards to migrants. But even this silly argument (which is not even a punishable offence) is not true. To me, the deadly disease is self-hatred and one of its worst symptoms is replacement migration. My enemy is thus NOT the migrants themselves but those orchestrating the mass migration.
Sadly, in Belgium, evidence is not needed and ‘vibes’ are enough to put someone in jail.
Given the fact that I have another court case coming up in September and that I have a dozen active criminal investigations for hate speech, time is running out for me. I have already paid more than €420,000 in legal fees and there is no ending in sight. I have been in an intense battle of attrition for eight years and must now regroup to make sure I can still win.
If you want to help me, you can do so via the links below. If you can help in other ways, please contact me via DM.
If you live in a country that still has free speech, never let them touch it, however noble they make the motives sound, because this is where it leads to.
We live in a permissionless world.
Technology cracked the walls of credentialism.
Opportunity is freely accessible more than ever before and you don’t need a stamp of approval, college or experience.
You just need to create things ppl like or need. You just need to do things.
I can NOT overemphasize this enough:
DO NOT TRUST EMAILS
DO NOT TRUST PHONE CALLS
DO NOT TRUST SMS MESSAGES
DO NOT TRUST CHAT MESSAGES
DO NOT TRUST INCOMING COMMUNICATIONS!
Any message saying there is a security problem with an account that needs to be urgently fixed is a ��