@austindemocrats @LeadingReport Yea, we should leave things like that to people with the proper credentials, like Fauci. He’d never lead us astray😂 Remember, 2 shots and you’re done! Just 2 weeks to flatten the curve, and most of all, once you’re vaccinated, you won’t get sick!🥸
@onslotton46756@ShaziGoalie Probably white, which you wouldn’t think is a problem, but look at all your entry level jobs now. I haven’t been to a retail store or food joint where anyone even speaks english in a long time.
@nicksortor@CcpSkipTracer That’d have been Bidens FBI. Happened 10 months prior to him taking office. Not that he’d remember, but ask Biden if they looked into it at all.
@Lonna320@GeneralMCNews If you’re “accidentally” watching porn, I think subconsciously you’re trying to. Never have I seen porn I didn’t want to see lol.
California is the most corrupt voting system in the US. When I voted in Glendale CA today, I refused to confirm my information was accurate, but the polling officials still had to trust me and issue a ballot. I asked the polling official to check my ID, and she simply said, “I take your word for it — it’s California.” This state is an absolute joke!! Voter ID is obviously necessary to ensure safe, secure, and verifiable elections. Never vote Dem again — MAGA!
Please share this post to expose how easy it would be to commit voter fraud in CA — the rest of the country cannot go down this same path!
@JustinTrudeau Now show some stats to show how little progress that made….🥴 Out gun problem doesn’t stem from Canada, never mind law abiding citizens in Canada. You’re a clown, and should have listened to your police forces..The people that actually deal with it.
This clip may be the most egregious example of ABC debate moderators' direct actions/inactions to affect viewers’ perceptions of the information presented at the debate.
There are at least seven instances of this within a two-minute span.
This is not “bias."
It’s much worse.
This is direct, planned interference in the debate outcome. When moderators take on the role of “fact checkers" the inference is that the absence of a “fact check” confers validity to the non-fact-checked information.
When one side is repeatedly “fact checked,” while the other is not, that is a signal to the viewer that one side is not reliable and truthful, while the other side is.
The ABC moderators had their orders, and here you see those orders executed.
In this clip:
1) Trump says Pelosi is responsible for security at the Capitol. True. Muir intervenes on Kamala’s behalf by cutting him off with snarky retort, doesn’t acknowledging the validity of Trump’s statement, and immediately redirects to Kamala to set up her “answer" he knows is coming. This is direct action by Muir to affect the outcome of this exchange.
2) Kamala says she was at the Capitol on J6. She was there in the morning, but left to go to DNC HQ prior to the riot. Critical information is omitted. No fact-check.
3) Kamala says Trump incited a mob to attack the Capitol. False. Trump’s “peacefully and patriotically” comments are ignored. Trump is not charged with inciting violence. No fact check.
4) Kamala says that “some" police officers died on January 6. False. No fact check.
5) Kamala recites the Charlottesville “Fine People” hoax. This has been thoroughly and repeatedly debunked. No fact check.
6) Kamala recites the “stand back and stand by” hoax. This is designed to infer that Trump was ordering a “militia” to act on later orders, when he was clearly asking for a cooling of tensions. No fact check.
7) Kamala recites the “bloodbath" hoax. Trump was talking about the automobile industry, not violence. No fact check.
To quote Megyn Kelly on the ABC moderators:
"They did exactly what their bosses wanted."