imperfectlyperfect

[imperfectlyperfect @honestecho2u2]

@RavenGrace0613 @PoliticsOnX Somebody please tell Raven who Clarissa is (and me too 😂).

[imperfectlyperfect @honestecho2u2]

@MattWalshBlog Also, can we stop paying her? Asking for a friend!

[imperfectlyperfect @honestecho2u2]

@MattWalshBlog It is baffling! The energy level it takes to care for little ones is high and so is the risk of perimenopause and the desire to not even have kids….so many reasons to have them when you’re young.

[imperfectlyperfect @honestecho2u2]

@patriot_savvy @JayTC53 @RealCandaceO The hypocrisy is really baffling. 🤦‍♀️

[imperfectlyperfect @honestecho2u2]

@Outspoken_Sam Did you! I’m sorry🤦‍♀️

[imperfectlyperfect @honestecho2u2]

@clerpatriot @graciehannah99 Right! The comments on her post are the epitome of hypocrisy. They are so worried about Candace? Where is the concern for Erika? Candace has been sending millions after her for months.

[imperfectlyperfect @honestecho2u2]

@paramounttactcl @ErikaCA47 Well heck Gary! She’s gonna think we coordinated because I used the same verbiage “clutched pearls”…😂😂😂! The hypocrisy is thick!

[imperfectlyperfect @honestecho2u2]

@graciemae033 Yes, I agree! Do they plan to attack and dox each one of from the chat?

[imperfectlyperfect @honestecho2u2]

The hypocrisy in the comments is absolutely astounding.

Suddenly everyone is deeply concerned because 92 people were in a private group chat discussing Candace Owens and pushing back against what we believed were lies and misinformation surrounding Charlie Kirk’s assassination and the relentless attacks on Erika Kirk and TPUSA.

I was in that chat. Someone added me, and I barely participated as was the case for many in the chat.

Yet apparently we’re all “deranged” and Candace should fear for her safety?

Where has this concern been for Erika?

Candace has an audience of MILLIONS. For months she has publicly questioned, accused, insinuated and speculated about Erika, TPUSA and practically anyone who challenges her narrative. Her audience then takes those claims and runs with them across social media, essentially putting targets on people’s backs.

Candace has even mocked or questioned Erika over security concerns and canceled appearances because of threats against her.

And where were all of you clutching your pearls then?

Where were the comments saying, “This is getting dangerous”?

Where was the concern about what happens when millions of people are repeatedly fed suspicion and inflammatory accusations about a grieving widow?

Where was the concern when people were obsessively analyzing Erika’s every movement, every facial expression, every relationship and every decision?

But 92 ordinary people have a PRIVATE group chat to discuss and refute those narratives and suddenly everyone is terrified?

Give me a break.

And let me be very clear about my own experience: I never witnessed anyone threaten Candace or her family. I never saw anyone planning violence. I never saw Candace’s address shared. I wasn’t very active, so I cannot speak for every message ever posted, and I won’t pretend that I can but from what I saw that didn’t happen.

If an individual crossed a legal or ethical line, hold that individual accountable.

But painting 92 people as dangerous or “deranged” because they participated in a private discussion is absurd.

You cannot cheer while someone with millions of followers publicly tears apart Erika and TPUSA day after day, then suddenly discover your concern for harassment, obsession and personal safety when criticism starts flowing in the opposite direction.

And please spare me the selective outrage about people talking about Candace.

Freedom of speech isn’t reserved for Candace Owens.

Freedom of association isn’t reserved for Candace Owens supporters.

The rest of us are allowed to gather, talk, research, disagree, criticize and push back too.

If you believe those freedoms protect Candace when she speaks to millions, then they also protect 92 people talking amongst themselves.

Principles only count when you apply them to people you disagree with.

Otherwise, it’s hypocrisy.

And for the love of all things holy and beautiful, TURN OFF THE PODCASTS for five minutes. Go outside. Breathe some fresh air. Touch some grass. Feel the sun on your face. Get a little vitamin D. Talk to an actual human being who isn’t speaking into a microphone.

Not every group chat is a covert operation. Not every disagreement is a conspiracy. Not everyone who disagrees with your favorite podcaster is a paid operative, a threat, a bot, or part of some grand scheme.

Sometimes people just disagree with you.

[Candace Owens @RealCandaceO]

Okay now that I’ve learn that it is a Jewish woman, Clarissa Goldemberg, who is the admin of the chat of 92 people who were sharing information about me and my family, I am actually am going to file a report.
You will recall last year we had a would-be Jewish terrorist who was plotting my murder on a group chat that similarly grew increasingly radical and obsessive until the FBI stepped in. That man is currently in prison after he pled guilty.
I have learned that within this “protect Erika Kirk” group chat they not only were sharing our personal information, but were sharing photos and trying to match my kitchen according to a Russell Brand interview I did.
I am of the belief that when an actual member of the chat opts to leave because it is growing too deranged, you should take their word for it and protect your children. Britta Weidner sending 4,040 tweets about me in the span of just 10 months is evidence of a real obsessive derangement.
@iamcoachcolin —you were also discussed in this chat and they were trying to run your personal information as well. @paramounttactcl specifically was looking for your personal information and I have the messages if you need them.

[imperfectlyperfect @honestecho2u2]

@AcmePhoto @OrlandoG85 FYI…That reply was to Orlando not you. I think you and I have a good rapport.

[imperfectlyperfect @honestecho2u2]

@OrlandoG85 @AcmePhoto Why is it so hard for you people to comprehend truth. Stop watching Candace.

[imperfectlyperfect @honestecho2u2]

@Realalexclark @HannahD16809 @RealCandaceO @TPUSA 😂😂😂😂

[imperfectlyperfect @honestecho2u2]

@setag54321

[imperfectlyperfect @honestecho2u2]

If I were a betting woman, I’d put money on Candace suddenly discovering a very serious, very unexpected, completely unavoidable reason why she simply can’t make the Andrew Wilson debate.

Because… where have we seen this movie before? 😂

Remember when TPUSA said they were going to do a livestream addressing Candace’s accusations, insinuations, and claims surrounding Charlie’s assassination, and Candace was invited?

She said, “Any time. Any place.”

So they gave her a date and a time.

And then she couldn’t do it because, according to Candace, her husband said no because he “runs the household.”

Of course, somehow the whole thing became about Candace being “invited to a debate,” when that wasn’t actually what was being proposed.

She appeared to be backing out, so Erika said, essentially, “Fine. I’ll come to you.”

And the grieving widow went to Candace.

Then there was the whole “George has people coming in from overseas, so I can’t do the 15th” explanation… only for George to apparently be able to attend at least part of the meeting.

Remember what happened AFTER that meeting?

Her own supporters were furious that it wasn’t livestreamed or even recorded. People started questioning her. And then, suddenly…

…three days later, Mitch Snow appeared on her show claiming he had seen Erika at Fort Huachuca.

Remember when…

And this is why I’m saying, if I were a betting woman…

But hey, maybe this time will be different. 😂

@paleochristcon be careful Mitch might be back with an update that you were at Ft. Huachuca too!

[imperfectlyperfect @honestecho2u2]

@KaneArabe You are correct…humanity needs peace. Maybe mention that to Candace!

[imperfectlyperfect @honestecho2u2]

To be abundantly clear because people are twisting the truth of what happened with the TPUSA livestream that Candace was invited to.

Candace was invited to attend the livestream that TPUSA planned back in December to address and refute claims and insinuations surrounding Charlie Kirk’s assassination. The livestream was not contingent upon her attendance, so TPUSA was under no obligation to accommodate any requests or coordinate the event around her. They did not need her participation to hold the livestream.

An invitation to attend someone else’s event does not mean the host is required to restructure the entire event around the invited party. The host determines the purpose, timing, and format of the event; the invitee then decides whether to attend based on their own availability and circumstances. This is standard practice.

The claim being made is being misrepresented by shifting it into a discussion about whether participation could have been arranged differently. That was never the point. Introducing that angle changes the premise of the argument rather than engaging with it.

Good-faith disagreement is always welcome, but it requires addressing the actual claim being made—not a modified version of it.

[Lisa Shelton @LisaShe29049049]

@honestecho2u2 Actually they informed her of the meeting at midnight! The night before ....so try again

[imperfectlyperfect @honestecho2u2]

The only reason the livestream didn’t happen is because Erika had to go to Candace and meet and you know this. Yes, I have an issue with Candace not agreeing to meet in person for the livestream. She’s accusing people of murder. She should have made the time like she said she would. But because it wasn’t on her terms she through a hissy and said no. Period. Now I will block you because you are a bad faith actor.

[imperfectlyperfect @honestecho2u2]

@Icecreamb4dnner They could post the date and time whenever they wanted because the livestream wasn’t contingent upon Candace’s participation. They invited her but they were going to do the livestream with or without her.

[imperfectlyperfect @honestecho2u2]

@essentialContra @THEGROYPERMOGS @str8nofilt3r @Amy1010212345 So is your issue that they never came back and did the livestream?

[imperfectlyperfect @honestecho2u2]

@Ximenapersal Nope! Here is what Erika said. That didn’t mean that they would still have their regular podcast.

[imperfectlyperfect @honestecho2u2]

@THEGROYPERMOGS @str8nofilt3r @essentialContra @Amy1010212345 What I’m saying is that they invited Candace to attend in person if she was available. She refused.