@HypeYourGames Dann warte ich bis Dezember, den BS unterstütze ich nicht. Wenn der einzige Grund, keine Disc als Vorbestellung anzubieten, ist, dass man Spoiler vermeiden will, dann sollte ab dem Releasetag die Disc verfügbar sein, da es dann ja keine Spoiler mehr geben kann.
@KevinHKraemer@Kevinw927@PlayStationDE Es reicht doch, wenn die Disc als physischer Lizenzschlüssel dient. Dann kann ich sie wie jede andere Disc an Freunde weitergeben oder verkaufen.
Der Hauptgrund, warum es keine Disc gibt, ist, weil sie keinen Zweitmarkt mit den gebrauchten Discs haben wollen.
@MachtCloud1@Kevinw927@TheSlayerzero@HypeYourGames Macht schon Sinn, denn dann kann ich die Disc einem Freund geben oder verkaufen, wenn ich möchte.
Ein Code verhindert das, und das wird auch der Hauptgrund sein. Die wollen nicht, dass es einen Zweitmarkt gibt.
@Kevinw927@TheSlayerzero@HypeYourGames Genau. Es muss ja nicht das ganze Spiel auf der Disc sein aber ich will die Disc als physikalischen Lizenzschlüssel
@SequoiaKingsNPS@NatlParkService The problem with designing trash cans in this case is that there is an overlap between the smartest bears and the humans.
I think the cups next to the bin are a result of humans in that overlap.
@HypeYourGames Das wäre ja ok, auch wenn es dann einen Grund gibt warum das nicht an die große Glocke gehangen wird.
Aber im Nachhinein sollte das von Sony definitv aufgeklärt werden.
@HypeYourGames Gestern konnte ich noch eine PS5 Pro bei Amazon ergattern.
750€ angebot und noch 40€ Extra Rabatt.
War schon lange am überlegen aber für 710€ hab ich mal zugeschlagen.
🚨 Everyone told me a small creator can't legally beat YouTube.
I proved them wrong. WON the case. Got the official decision.
🤯 Turns out the REAL impossible part isn't winning.
It's getting YouTube to acknowledge you WON.
This story proves YouTube's system is designed to crush the creator.
Here's what happened when I fought back: 👇
JUNE 2024: I get the email every creator dreads. My channel is demonetized for "reused content."
I fight back. I appeal, and luckily, get a human review.
A HUMAN at YouTube actually reviews my work. My editing timeline, my scripts, my voiceovers. They see it all because I sent them a 5-minute video of my whole creation process.
✅ Their verdict?
"This is original content. You follow all guidelines." Monetization restored.
A human saw my work. A human validated me. I was safe.
🛑 But I was wrong.
NOVEMBER 2024: My channel is TERMINATED.
🚫 The reason? "Spam, deceptive practices, and scams."
🤔 Wait... how? A human JUST cleared me months ago. Since I was verified by a YouTube employee, I knew my content was fine. I was creating EV news/car review videos that the YouTube Team had already accepted. Yet, the AI bot didn't care this time.
I appealed again. This time, it wasn't a human. It was an AI. Instant rejection. No explanation.
This is where most creators give up. But for me, it felt so unfair that I couldn't accept it.
As an EU citizen, I found legal options most creators don't know about.
⚖️ I took my case to ADROIT, an official EU legal dispute body. I wasn't just appealing to YouTube anymore. I was forcing them to defend their decision in a legal arena.
YouTube had every chance to defend themselves and show what I violated.
And on July 23, 2025, the decision arrived.
The verdict (see screenshot):
✅ "Complaint is UPHELD"
✅ "YouTube's termination was NOT RIGHTFUL"
✅ "YouTube failed to specify the violating content" and my channel should be reinstated.
🛑 YouTube terminated my channel, calling it "Spam, Deceptive & Scam."
🟢 The European Union Certified Dispute Body reviewed my content and found the OPPOSITE: my content is LEGIT.
HERE IS WHAT THE INDEPENDENT ADJUDICATOR FOUND (see screenshot):
1️⃣ I am Credible: "The Complainant has submitted a credible and detailed account of the content creation practices."
2️⃣ My Content is Original: "These include original scripting, lawful use of licensed media assets, and adherence to editorial standards."
3️⃣ I Followed the Rules: My content is "consistent with the platform's published guidelines."
THE REALITY:
🟢 A human legal expert reviewed my work and saw Original Content.
🛑 YouTube's bots saw "Spam."
‼️ Here's where it gets terrifying!
My channel is STILL terminated, even though YouTube's actions were against the law and I have the legal document to prove it.
Who is not being honest here?
🟢 Me, who opened my content to an independent auditor?
🚫 Or YouTube, who never provided a single piece of proof of my "violations"?
So I have:
✅ An independent legal body finding my content creation practices credible
✅ YouTube's own June 2024 human review finding full compliance of my content with the policies
✅ All my content confirmed to be legitimate by the dispute body
✅ A legal decision that YouTube violated the law
YouTube has:
❌ No specific evidence
❌ Contradictory past assessments
❌ Violated procedural law
YouTube's silence about my termination is 100% intentional.
➡️ Responding = admitting their AI was wrong and they broke the law.
➡️ Admitting = accountability.
➡️ Accountability = actually fixing things.
➡️ Easier to ignore one creator than fix a broken system.
❗️They're really hoping I shut up about it. But I'm not going anywhere.
🆘 I need your help:
🔄 RT this and tag @TeamYouTube
Please make them listen, so they can't pretend that nothing happened. It's time for answers!
If they can do this to me AFTER I won the decision, what chance does any creator have?
#YouTubeAIWrongedCreators @YouTube@YouTubeCreators@YouTubeInsider