@Biohazard3737 Wouldn’t you say that they’re many more examples of ideas from which your skepticism saved you? Being curious and open minded is key, but a matching skeptic trait is needed to survive out there.
@WassimLaroussi3@seedy19tron I see. Several regulatory expert colleagues I’ve asked are confident on a clean label on those numbers, but of course only time and FDA will tell.
@WassimLaroussi3@seedy19tron I’d assume prescribers would like to skip the need to enumerate the scary black box warning items from Rinvoq and rather prescribe a clean label drug with better efficacy?
@Andre_AGTC@Craigster771 I agree. Hard to see inhibitors reaching biologic-like efficacy, but only clinical data will tell.
Gilead’s in licenced STAT6 degraders from LEO Pharma look highly competitive according to the patent literature.
Looking forward to seeing what turtleneck sweater shows @A_May_MD tomorrow at @BiotechTV to explain why $ABVX is down 20% after breathtaking data @bradloncar
@semodough Druggability questions aside, how will a IL-4Ra inhibitor differentiate from the current wave of STAT6 inhibitors / degraders?
I still remember the day $VTYX announced they had started an IL-4Ra small molecule inhibitor program.
@WassimLaroussi3@mickeychiku@A_May_MD of patients that might benefit from the safer topical delivery. A few of my past dermatologists colleagues are really into this (kind of the past/current biologics-in-a-pill, now pill-as-topical ;-)) 2/2
@WassimLaroussi3@mickeychiku@A_May_MD For specific cases, topicals are making a come back (if they ever left). Kind of tissue specific delivery as long as systemic exposure is not the main driver of efficacy, so formulating potent, "new" MoA drugs as topicals is an effective way of perhaps reaching a segmentation 1/2
@A_May_MD If you were to show this to the average person, I’m pretty sure their first reaction would be to think they’re looking at a before-and-after hair transplant advertisement