*Revised
Support for "Age Verification" in the Senate is extremely dangerous This document list all the bills (so far) and how many of them each member of congress is sponsoring
While not "Age Verification" this bill is bad:
S.3546 - Sunset Section 230 Act
https://t.co/8Pu7WRTaaK
Age verification is not a child safety measure.
It is an identity infrastructure project. Being built by companies that profit from identity data in some countries.
There might be a way to not be from those countries while using the internet....
(thread.) All of my time on the internet i barely have used discord much. I created a stoat and a fluxer account after they said they were gonna push for age verification. I've been on fluxer more than discord and stoat. Kind of funny coincidence i lost access to my
Discord rolls out age-verification "lite" that sorts people into age groups automatically, no ID required
-----
This is incrementalism.
They've seen too much resistance to age verification that requires an ID, so they need to take a smaller step people won't reject.
That smaller step is to roll out age verification that doesn't require ID (in this case for 90% of users).
If we accept this, they will have established that they can age-categorize the internet.
Apps like Discord are rolling it out as a test right now; if it works, legislation will follow.
The app enables age-categorization of the internet; the legislation codifies the government's authority to require it.
Once they have the authority to age-categorize the internet codified into law, they are that much closer to an ID-based age-gating/verification system that they will push for next.
Or, another incremental strategy is to make it so that 90% of users don't need an ID right now, then move it to 89%, then to 88%, and so on.
This would reduce the number of affected users, so unaffected users are less likely to leave the service in solidarity with those who are affected, ultimately reducing the backlash of rolling out age verification.
Either way, we're that much closer to having to use an ID to get online.
https://t.co/vgEskSeduG
your sole existence relies on smugly advocating for one company's incompetence and sensationalizing serious problems (incl. grooming) with vids that have corny thumbnails and gamer juice ads.
Have some dignity and stop calling people schizos for not trusting your golden goose
Look, you have had MULTIPLE data breaches and promised to delete user data and DIDN'T.
It's insane to expect your users trust you after that, esp since this is VERY RECENT stuff that's happened and there's been ZERO proof their data is safe in your hands.
@remixedcat On ubuntu for now. I do want to get to arch one day maybe. I know how to do the sudo install. That's it -.- a irl friend is helping me learn currently
@RozettaArt@LivvyPersonals@discord That's just what they want you to think, unfortunately. These systems are easy to bypass and susceptible to getting hacked, leading to Identity Theft and incidents like the 30,000 Govt IDs leaked from Discord.
Discord knows if you submit to age verification that you will be on your best behavior, because they will have a link to your identity, be it direct or indirect, and will be recording and reporting everything.
@notexttospeech You shouldn't be defending Discord if you care about privacy in the first place. Not only Discord is completely proprietary, but they sell their users' data. You should promote Free Software, privacy-respecting alternatives instead, like Jami, Stoat, Mumble etc.
@ColRealPro@discord@svishnevskiy They added an automated profiler based on account signals, which is a better best-case for most people. But the important part is still the fallback—and that still requires submitting personal information (card, ID, etc.). Being profiled isn't ideal either.
@ColRealPro@discord@svishnevskiy at any point discord can force yo to give your personal information to them or lock you out by claiming they think you are younger
@nionsthetic07@HinikuMsS@ColRealPro@discord@svishnevskiy you're still doxing yourself. All Discord done was expand out their third party vendors. Google, apple, and etc. You run your information through them. Only God knows what they are doing with that. It's still too dangerous and risky. Waiting for next data breach to happen
@nionsthetic07@HinikuMsS@ColRealPro@discord@svishnevskiy you're still doxing yourself. All Discord done was expand out their third party vendors. Google, apple, and etc. You run your information through them. Only God knows what they are doing with that. It's still too dangerous and risky. Waiting for next data breach to happen
Excellent article by .@brian_lenney on Focus on the Family's recent feature of Meta's coalition leader, Melissa McKay, and the App Store Accountability Act.
Fair point to ask what Jesus would think about a prayer request granting the success of a policy that grants government power over parents and let's Meta off the hook for harms to children...🤔
Full article 👇