Shelley Coleman

#TruthSeeker 🇬🇧🇿🇦Go MAGA 🇺🇸 Say not, “I have found the truth,” but rather, “I have found a truth.”

[Gunther Eagleman™ @GuntherEagleman]

He spent billions of his own dollars defending free speech, and that’s exactly why we love Elon!

The dude saved free speech.

[Arthur MacWaters @ArthurMacwaters]

One thing that is actually *underappreciated* about Elon is his humility

He's talking to a reporter who is, by her tone and framing of questions, clearly trying to chide and belittle him

It’s not obvious that the richest man in the world would do any of this.

She is clearly trying to provoke him iwth gotcha soundbites like "do you think about why people loathe you" "do you think what you're doing is good for western democracy"

The tone is clearly "wouldn't you like to apologize for how evil and shameful you've been"

He's taking minutes of his time (idk how to estimate their dollar value) to do submit to this

He keeps responding calmly and genuinely stating what specifically he believes

He is not flexing his own accomplishments, power, or knowledge as anything other than a regular person who refuses to be shamed into conformity

He is clearly trying to engage with her rather on the content of things rather than just "win"

The irony of all of her barbed questions and implied moral superiority is that despite every reason to be the opposite, Elon is actually **more humble** than she is.

[Race 🕊️ @multiplanet1]

Elon Musk's brother Kimbal once described the phone call where Elon told him he was putting his entire PayPal fortune into rockets and electric cars. And it reveals the moment Kimbal realized his brother was operating on a different frequency than everyone else.

Kimbal said he tried to talk him out of it. Not because the ideas were bad. Because the risk was insane. $180 million split between two industries with the highest failure rate in existence. No safety net. No diversification. Everything on two bets that every expert said would fail.

He said Elon listened patiently to every argument. The way he always does when someone tells him something is impossible. Then he said something Kimbal has never forgotten. He said "what's the point of money you don't use for something that matters."

Kimbal said that was the moment he stopped trying to talk his brother out of things. Not because the logic was sound. Because he realized Elon wasn't making a financial decision. He was making a moral one. In his mind keeping $180 million in a bank while humanity had no backup plan for extinction was the risky move. Spending it all on Mars and electric cars was the safe move.

The entire world saw a billionaire making a reckless gamble. His brother saw a man who couldn't live with the guilt of having resources and not deploying them on the biggest problems he could find.

The difference between reckless and visionary is always obvious in retrospect. In real time it looks exactly the same. The only thing that separates them is whether the person turns out to be right.

[Dustin @r0ck3t23]

Elon Musk just spent seventeen billion dollars to make every cell tower on Earth a relic.

Musk: “It will allow SpaceX to deliver high bandwidth connectivity directly from the satellites to the phones.”

Not through towers. Not through cables. Not through any infrastructure on the ground.

Directly from orbit to the phone in your pocket.

For over a century, connectivity followed the same blueprint. Build a tower. Run a cable. Expand the network one piece of ground at a time.

Coverage went where the money was. Where the population density justified the investment.

Everywhere else got silence.

Four billion people still don’t have reliable internet.

Not because the technology doesn’t exist. Because no one could justify building a tower where they live.

Connectivity was never a technology problem. It was a geography problem disguised as one.

Musk: “The phones that are able to use the spectrum that was acquired probably start shipping in around two years.”

Two years. Then the phone in your hand connects straight to space.

No tower required. No carrier infrastructure between you and the signal.

The entire telecom industry was built on one assumption. That connectivity requires ground infrastructure.

Every carrier. Every contract. Every coverage map. All products of that assumption.

Starlink just bypassed it from orbit.

From orbit, every point on Earth is equidistant.

The word “remote” only exists because connectivity was built from the ground up.

From space, there is no remote. There is no coverage gap. There is no place on Earth harder to reach than any other.

The ground decides who gets connected based on where they are.

The sky doesn’t know the difference.

Human potential was always distributed evenly across the planet. Access to information never was.

The gap between those two facts is the greatest waste in human history.

We spent a century deciding who deserved access to information based on where they happened to be born.

Musk just made that question obsolete from 550 kilometers above the answer.

[DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican]

Hello Mrs. Owens,

You told millions of people that Tyler Robinson "wasn't even there." That you felt "confident stating that Tyler Robinson did not kill murder Charlie Kirk."

He was on camera. Prone on the Losi rooftop at 12:22. Shot at 12:23:28. DNA on the screwdriver at 30 quintillion to one. DNA on the rifle at 1.7 octillion to one. He told his family what he did. His parents helped him surrender. He texted his roommate: "I am, I'm sorry." He engraved "Hey Fascist! Catch!" on the ammunition a month before he used it.

You said police "didn't even question" Lance Twiggs. He was interviewed twice. FBI the morning after. Joint state-federal team seven months later. His own attorney. Voluntary phone surrender. You laughed when you said it.

You told Shawn Ryan a shaped charge killed Charlie. That PETN was in his microphone. The medical examiner says gunshot wound. Bullet fragments were recovered from his body. A .30-06 Mauser with Robinson's DNA was found in the woods. Neither side — not prosecution, not defense — has mentioned explosives. Not once in four days.

You said the shot came from below. The Losi building is above the amphitheater.

You called Erika Kirk a "clinical psychopath" to an audience of millions. You said the assassination was "an occult ritual." You said Charlie was "sitting in a pentagram." You told people Israel killed him because he refused Netanyahu.

You made over a hundred episodes. You built a franchise on a dead man's name.

And the hardest fact of all: Tyler Robinson's own defense lawyers — the people whose entire career is on the line to get him acquitted — have refused to make a single one of your arguments. Not one. They're challenging DNA methodology. They are doing their jobs. You were doing something else entirely.

Charlie Kirk changed my life. He platformed my work when nobody knew who I was. He had my back when I was doxxed. I was the ten-thousandth most important person in his world and I will never be able to repay him.

So I did what I know how to do. I read every transcript. I watched every hour of testimony. I cataloged your claims and I held them up against what was said under oath.

Every single one failed.

I don't know why you did this. I'm not going to speculate on your motives, because that would make me exactly the kind of analyst I've spent my career refusing to be. But I know what you did. You told people confident lies about a dead man's murder, and millions of them believed you, and some of them turned that belief into threats against his widow.

The trial continues. And every day of sworn testimony is another day your words get tested against reality... under oath, on the record, where it counts.

I'll be here for all of it... because just as Charlie defended me, I will do what little I can to defend his legacy and @TPUSA and @MrsErikaKirk from evil.

[Sama Hoole @SamaHoole]

American cardiology quietly rewrote its rules in the spring of 2026, and almost nobody noticed.

The new dyslipidemia guideline does two things. It drops the ideal LDL lower than ever. And it swaps in a risk calculator that no longer asks whether you'll have a heart attack in the next ten years. It asks whether you'll have one in the next thirty.

Think about what that unlocks. A ten-year risk keeps the drugs pointed at older people, because that's who actually gets heart attacks soon. Stretch the window to thirty years and a healthy thirty-year-old suddenly lights up as "at risk", because give anyone enough decades and the odds of anything climb. The guideline says the quiet part out loud: it wants treatment to begin at thirty, on the theory that a lifetime of lower cholesterol beats a few years of it.

A Harvard team ran the numbers on the new thresholds. At one setting, the guideline recommends statins for roughly 21 million more American adults than before. Twenty-one million fresh patients, conjured not by an epidemic but by a formula and a lowered line.

None of these people are ill. That's the elegant part. They feel completely fine, because there are no symptoms to have. They will be told, on the authority of a risk equation, that a silent number in their blood has marked them, and that the responsible thing is to take a drug every single day from now until they die, to shift a prediction about a year most of them can barely picture.

The beauty of a thirty-year risk score is that it can never be proved wrong in time for you to care. Take the pill and stay well, and the pill worked. Have a heart attack anyway, and think how much worse it would have been without it. The prediction protects itself.

There is no version of the next thirty years where you get to find out you didn't need it.

[Shelley Coleman @hothog8]

@hicasamadim 9

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

And this report is just the tip of an enormous iceberg of evil

[Konstantin Kisin @KonstantinKisin]

I think possibly the best thing about Elon Musk becoming a trillionaire is how angry it makes a bunch of losers who've never built a thing in their lives.

[Australischer Austauschstudent @VceOfReason]

Was die meisten schon wieder vergessen haben:

2021 hat Elon Musk den Vereinten Nationen angeboten, für die Beendigung des Welthungers mit dem Verkauf eines Teils seiner Tesla-Aktien zu zahlen.

Die einzige Bedingung: Die Vereinten Nationen legen transparent offen, wie genau dieser Betrag den Welthunger beenden würde und wie die Mittel eingesetzt werden.

Natürlich haben die Vereinten Nationen das Angebot nicht angenommen. Sie hätten nämlich erklären müssen, wie es sein kann, dass seit den 1950er Jahren 2 BILLIONEN DOLLAR an „Entwicklungshilfen“ nach Afrika geflossen sind, sich aber in all den Jahren nichts zum Besseren entwickelt hat.

Das Problem ist nicht Elon Musk.
Das Problem sind korrupte Politiker, die dir sagen, dass Elon Musk das Problem wäre.

[Gad Saad @GadSaad]

The damage that the charlatan @BarackObama has done to the United States is incalculable. He is swimming in an infinity pool of malignant narcissism. A true scammer filled with destructive ideological anti-American zeal.

[Shelley Coleman @hothog8]

The best voice ever!

[Shelley Coleman @hothog8]

@AmericaFirsst A

[Shelley Coleman @hothog8]

@bagshaw2112 Truss - she was sabotaged

["Doc" Hypnosis 🧠 | BowTied Brain-Hacking @BowTiedTrance]

The Scott Adams hypnosis track to solve your biggest problem -- lovingly edited and with added audio enhancements for maximum effectiveness.

(Use headphones to get the full impact of the Theta wave frequencies.)

You can spare 13 minutes to fix your biggest problem, can't you?

(Don't watch this if you're driving, ok?)

[Shelley Coleman @hothog8]

@Jennnyyyyyy 11

[Shelley Coleman @hothog8]

@OneBadDude_ @cohen_brother 😂😂

[Shelley Coleman @hothog8]

@Elina_660 360

[Shelley Coleman @hothog8]

@Simi_2210_ 3

[Shelley Coleman @hothog8]

@renabaddie_ 45