@GorgonsGrimoire@szalony321@FTC Care to cite some case law on the issue of someone explicitly consenting to installation of software that might make certain hardware non functional and then complaining that it became non functional?
@GorgonsGrimoire@EvilSecOfficial@FTC@riotgames Your property rights can be signed away. You sign some of them away explicitly when installing Vanguard. Don’t like it? Don’t install it.
@GorgonsGrimoire@FTC If you know much about that case you’d know that a huge part of the Sony/BMG case was that the EULA did not authorize it. (Also it broke several licenses on its own.)
Vanguard’s EULA explicitly authorizes it. Don’t want cheat hardware bricked? Don’t install Vanguard. Ezpz.
@r_kyle86849@riotgames Nothing was vandalized. Users installed an anti cheat software package onto systems with cheating software and, surprise! The system breaks because the cheat is at a hardware level. This isn’t vandalism. The user chose to install the root level anti cheat.
@scyshw6492@mogisome@riotgames They can absolutely do that if you install software and sign an EULA that explicitly says they can do the thing they’re doing.
@eron_wolf@riotgames They can do that. They just can’t install Valorant’s AC and do it. Perfectly reasonable. Don’t want your hardware cheats fucked with? Don’t voluntarily install the game that has hardware aware anti cheat.