@mattwardman@Brick_Cop@metpoliceuk Absolutely. It seems crazy to ride 40mph in a built-up area, but that's a 'due care' or 'wanton riding' thing. Speeding is not legally enforceable on cyclists so framing it as that just gets everyone riled up. Maybe some police just think cyclists are mad to be out on the roads.
@Brick_Cop@metpoliceuk No. The original tweet was poorly worded, with potential to stoke anti-cyclist prejudice, because of its reference to speeding. It should have said: "While speed limits don't apply to cyclists, there are laws to make sure they don't put others at risk, so we pulled them over".
It’s fine to tell cyclists to be mindful when riding fast but a post like this simply feeds into the already existing British anti-cycling rhetoric.
Especially when you don’t make it clear that these cyclists did not break any law.
In the UK, one can barely ride their bike without being verbally abused, and there’s always an existing fear of being hit by a car due to the many close encounters.
It’s one of the most unsafe countries I’ve ever ridden my bike.
The power of a name
Fish that have been renamed to boost sales:
Was Whore’s Egg
Now Sea Urchin
Was Patagonian Toothfish
Now Chilean Sea Bass
Was Slimehead
Now Orange Roughy
Was Rat Tail
Now Roundnose Grenadier
Was Pilchard
Now Cornish Sardine
Was Dolphinfish
Now Mahi Mahi
@MartinDaubney There is of course, nothing cynical about the way papers are framing this debate and stoking anger about the scheme. Only the most noble of intentions, such as the desire to see children breathe freely and everyone living in harmony.
@rorysutherland Need to know how 'less productive' is defined, beyond simply number of calls processed in a given day. For example, perhaps longer calls enjoyed better customer satisfaction scores, churn rate, brand affinity etc.