El día que Güler logre producir suficiente testosterona como para equlibrar la cantidad de estrógeno que tiene en ese cuerpo de lesbiana pasiva va a ser un gran jugador
Realistic
Winner: France
Best Player: Olishe
Top Scorer: Mbappe
Best GK: Pickford
Best Youngster: Yamal
Dark Horse: Netherlands
Surprise Team: Norway
Biggest Disappointment: Germany
Shock Exit: 🇦🇷
Dream Final: France vs Brazil
Supporting: Norway & Belgium
Don't Want 2 Win: 🏴��
Let's get the predictions in;
- World Cup Winner:
- Best Player (Golden Ball):
- Top Scorer (Golden Boot):
- Best Goalkeeper (Golden Glove):
- Best Young Player:
- Dark Horse:
- Surprise Team:
- Biggest Disappointment:
- Shock Group Stage Exit:
- Dream Final:
- Team You're Supporting:
- Team You Don't Want to Win:
@Gideoomatic Realistic
Winner: France
Best Player: Olishe
Top Scorer: Mbappe
Best GK: Pickford
Best Youngster: Yamal
Dark Horse: Netherlands
Surprise Team: Norway
Biggest Disappointment: Germany
Shock Exit: 🇦🇷
Dream Final: France vs Brazil
Supporting: Norway & Belgium
Don't Want 2 Win: 🏴
According to my calculations as a full-time masturbator with over 9 years of field experience, no.
Let MT = Masturbation Time and SIT = Sexual Intercourse Time.
Given:
MT = 2 minutes.
Now, assuming you've been using lubricant and not operating under Sahara Desert conditions, your projected SIT should be somewhere between 37.5 and 48.2 seconds.
Why?
Because your equation is missing several important variables:
• Woman Wetness (WW)
• Vaginal Grip (VG)
• Heat Multiplier (HM)
• Adrenaline Coefficient (AC)
• "Omo, this thing is actually happening" Factor (OTHIAHF)
After applying these variables to the Decagon Formula, your time reduces significantly.
However...
If you've been doing dry-hand training all these years, then the shock of warmth, wetness, and the fact that another human being is involved may reduce your SIT to approximately 19.6–25.7 seconds.
Therefore:
MT = 2 minutes (with lubricant)
→ SIT = 37.5–48.2 seconds
MT = 2 minutes (dry hand)
→ SIT = 19.6–25.7 seconds.
Yours sincerely,
DECAGON
BSc. Applied Masturbation Mathematics (AMM)
Department of Theoretical Ejaculatory Physics
Scar from the Lion King.
He is the only lion there that behaved like a lion. Mufasa was running that Kingdom like a circus. "Hey, look. I know I eat you but I really like you. Come look at my son who will grow up to eat you". Busy involving monkeys in lion affairs and leaving his brother to have no choice but to form frienships with the enemy hyenas.
He had every right to fight for that throne because that is what male lions do. He didn't even kill that dude, it was the wildebeests that finished him off. The same ones he was doing musicals with.
To show that he was right, Simba started a new life of eating bugs when he ran away because he has the same weak genes as his father. When there was a drought, Scar didn't eat bugs. He kept it real and starved, but they made it seem like the drought was his fault. He was leading in difficult times!
When it was now convenient and the rains were coming, your Bug Eating king came back to take on a starving Scar while he had a stomach full of caterpillars and cockroaches because even when living with prey he is not the leader.
Scar's only mistake was letting Simba live. If he killed that little dude then the rains would come and the Kingdom would thrive again under his leadership. But no, he let him live and he came back when it was convenient because he can only lead in good times like his useless father.
Mufasa and Simba were good dudes, Scar was just a real lion. Which is what you would expect in a movie about lions 🤦🏾♂️