Arth Jaiswal

Builder/Artist/Reader/Quantum Computing Enthusiast

[Arth Jaiswal @httpsXrth]

@geochurch @rejuvenatebio @Merck Translating ambitious biology into reproducible results is the hard part. Congrats on reaching a milestone where the science is attracting both validation and capital.

[Arth Jaiswal @httpsXrth]

@PhilipJohnston @SpaceNews_Inc @Starcloud_ All ears. 🔥 Orbital data centers could become one of the most important pieces of future digital infrastructure. Excited to hear your perspective.

[Arth Jaiswal @httpsXrth]

I do believe writing on pen and paper is fun, and at the same time, I hope the token costs in the future will go down and AI will become more efficient. It will boost the productivity of a person 10x, yet we will still need people who love doing the job.

[Arth Jaiswal @httpsXrth]

But we need to realize that we still need human accountability, and even if it boosts the productivity and output of a person, that is not the only measure. Just the kilo lines of code you produce should not be your only measure.

[Arth Jaiswal @httpsXrth]

I would appreciate, and still do appreciate, access to AI, and I would love it being integrated into the things where it should be.

[Arth Jaiswal @httpsXrth]

But if you have ever tried writing code in a language and then used AI for it, you know the feeling: "Meh, this code is so not me," or that it's just working code.

[Arth Jaiswal @httpsXrth]

It's not that I hate AI. I really like it. It can check your grammar, build a really buggy yet working MVP for first-time entrepreneurs, and so on.

[Arth Jaiswal @httpsXrth]

The people who really love to write good code get more dopamine from it than anything else. The feeling of doing something meaningful is great.

[Arth Jaiswal @httpsXrth]

AI kills a lot of the creativity that people could have obtained between the production it produces. Hey, I am not an AI naysayer, but honestly, things like coding used to be a measure of a craft.

[Arth Jaiswal @httpsXrth]

@BrandonSeverin @UniofOxford 🔥🔥

[Arth Jaiswal @httpsXrth]

The ultimate Founders play: Morris Chang wrote a massive 2-volume autobiography, but it's never been translated to English(completely).
A primary source from an extreme winner, completely untranslated? You breaking down those raw lessons for us would be legendary

[Arth Jaiswal @httpsXrth]

@davidsenra when are we getting a Morris Chang episode? The @AcquiredFM crew laid the legendary groundwork on TSMC, but we need the Founders-style breakdown of the man who built the literal bedrock of modern tech.

[Arth Jaiswal @httpsXrth]

@gilbert and @djrosent even flew to Taiwan for a rare, epic interview with Morris himself. The business lessons and mindsets he dropped are gold, but it only scratches the surface of his full philosophy.

https://t.co/OfYswO2jKT

[Arth Jaiswal @httpsXrth]

@DavidDeutschOxf Appeasement often protects the loudest faction while abandoning the very people who sustain an open society, the dissenters, critics, and moderates. By the time a culture of criticism collapses, the damage is already compounding.

[Arth Jaiswal @httpsXrth]

@DavidDeutschOxf A movement that suppresses newspapers, parties, and dissent is cutting itself off from error-correction, and history tends to punish systems that become closed to criticism

[Arth Jaiswal @httpsXrth]

@DavidDeutschOxf What’s striking in that debate is that some people already understood the deeper issue wasn’t ethnicity or territory alone, but whether a society permits criticism.

[Arth Jaiswal @httpsXrth]

@ewintang Exactly, it almost feels like quantum information has these “forbidden unless randomized” regions that keep showing up. The loophole ends up being so powerful that the original impossibility starts looking more like a constraint on representation than on information itself.

[Arth Jaiswal @httpsXrth]

@ewintang The beautiful part to me is that the no-go theorem never actually said purification was impossible, only that consistent deterministic purification was. Randomizing over the purification orbit somehow preserves almost all the operational power anyway. That’s an elegant loophole.

[Arth Jaiswal @httpsXrth]

I know what's going to be my favourite part of The Odyssey

[Arth Jaiswal @httpsXrth]

Demanding empathy, justice, and moral consideration only in situations that affect you while denying those same principles elsewhere is, in itself, a logical inconsistency. It doen't make one rational or honest; it merely exposes selective thinking disguised as intelligence.

[Arth Jaiswal @httpsXrth]

I have often seen sophomoric people use evolution as an excuse for inhumanity, whether it is animal cruelty or infidelity, yet conveniently dismiss it when the conversation shifts toward social justice in areas that affect them personally.

[Arth Jaiswal @httpsXrth]

Humanity is supposed to reflect our capacity to rise above cruelty, not our tendency to excuse it whenever it aligns with personal convenience.