Kultokrat Hubert Ziółkowski

Polish Nationalist
Z 🇵🇱🇵🇸🇷🇺🇲🇲🇰🇵🇮🇷

Personal (non political) acc: @HouraiChampion

[Kultokrat Hubert Ziółkowski @hubert_kowski]

Thought obviously the most normal and reasonable thing to do is have state intervention in combating the spread of de facto polygamy

[Kultokrat Hubert Ziółkowski @hubert_kowski]

Either through war or making suicide easier to do (Canada healthcare type shit) otherwise the welfare system goes into further and further debt forever, since these people not having reason to work for society since they get nothing from it, will not work.

[Kultokrat Hubert Ziółkowski @hubert_kowski]

Either through war or making suicide easier to do (Canada healthcare type shit) otherwise the welfare system goes into further and further debt forever, since these people not having reason to work for society since they get nothing from it, will not work.

[Kultokrat Hubert Ziółkowski @hubert_kowski]

Yes the excess men. Throughout history states usually allowed such men to die for the greater good or collective goals in warfare, but modern states don't allow it.

[Kultokrat Hubert Ziółkowski @hubert_kowski]

But pretty much they fear the mamluk sultanate, a slave caste using their experience to take the state for themselves and run it for their own purposes

To continue to engage in this growing polygamy, the state needs to kill off the excess men

[Leszek Miller @LeszekMiller]

Żeleński nadał jednostce wojskowej imię "Bohaterów UPA". To jest otwarte plucie w twarz każdemu Polakowi, którego dziadkowie, babcie, wujowie i ciotki zostali wyrżnięci siekierami, widłami i piłami na Wołyniu i w Galicji Wschodniej. To jest kopniak w twarz dla pamięci o tysiącach zamordowanych dzieci, kobiet i starców – rzezi, którą UPA przeprowadziła z premedytacją, z takim bestialstwem, że nawet Niemcom robiło się niedobrze. Wyobraźcie sobie, że ktoś w Niemczech nazwałby jednostkę wojskową imieniem „Bohaterów Einsatzgruppen”. Świat by eksplodował. A tu? Cisza. To nie jest uhonorowanie walczących o niepodległość. To jest uhonorowanie rzeźników, którzy mordowali bezbronnych ludzi tylko dlatego, że mówili po polsku i chodzili do kościoła. I Zełenski, zamiast odcinać się od tego bandyckiego dziedzictwa, świadomie wali nim w twarz Polsce. Czuję obrzydzenie i palący wstyd za tych wszystkich, którzy to będą bagatelizować i mówić „nie czas na protest”. Bo jest czas. Zawsze jest czas, żeby nie pozwolić, by mordercy zostali bohaterami. Domagam się aby prezydent Nawrocki odebrał Zełenskiemu order Orła Białego.

[Mario Nawfal @MarioNawfal]

🇵🇱 Poland’s fertility rate has fallen to an abysmal 1.07, one of the lowest in the entire world.

It’s a bit counterintuitive, as Poland is a socially conservative country with a booming economy.

But with economic progress often comes more women in the workforce, and fewer having children.

Poland’s rate is even lower than Japan’s (1.2), as well as the UK (1.4), Germany (1.4), and France (1.6).

Source: Notes from Poland

[(⩌ˬ⩌) Уисбг (⩌ˬ⩌) @uisbg1]

They were literally killing each other in the Region before Russia intervened.
Russia's biggest "involvement" was stopping them from killing each other.

[` #Curacao @XxX_skajfan_fan]

Balcerowicz

[pagliacci the hated 🌝 @Slatzism]

“wHy aRe tHerE iNdiaNs In pOrTuGaL?!”

Because they are good slaves, you are not.

I hate essay-posting but allow me a rare indulgence:

To understand what is happening now, you need understand that this isn’t the first time it’s happened.

Why are there Indians in Kenya? Suriname? Fiji? Burma?

Because Indians have always been the preferred servile class of elites. The evidence for this goes back hundreds of years.

I’ve spoken about British colonial Burma before, and it is a great example of what this looks like.

Even after extensive efforts to bring them to heel, the majority of the Burmese ethnic groups were far too resistant to submit to the British empire to be reliable labor. They refused to abandon their culture and ways of life to be slave drones for British pocketbooks. So the Brits started importing Indians to be their colonial administrators, preferring them as labor because they were easier to control and satisfy.

By the 1940s, Indians made up almost 20% of the population of the entire country.

Another great historical example of this is Suriname - a small country in South America that had been under Dutch colonial rule for 300 years.

The Dutch abolished slavery in 1863, forcing colonial plantation owners to have to hire labor to do the work they had previously been using slaves for. But… they didn’t want to pay former slaves or Indigenous locals a living wage for the work.

So what did the Dutch elites do instead? Import Indians.

Today, Indians still make up 27% of the population. 27%. Of a tiny, obscure South American country.

We could basically go through the list of every country with a non-negligible Indian population and the theme would be consistent: They were brought there by elites who needed a submissive, easily exploitable labor pool when local labor asked for better living conditions or wages.

Why? Because Indians never did. They are a population that seems fully content with subjugation (even Marx noticed this).

So it’s easy to see why they were such an ideal population for the intensive global expansion era of colonial empires. And it’s even easier to see why they are perfect subjects for late capitalism now.

They are the culturally, psychologically, and physically ideal organism for the dominant system.

There’s 1.4 billion of them. They are deeply socially stratified and so expect and even enjoy inequality. Their cuisine is cheap, meat-free slop. They live amongst trash and filth with no qualms. They don’t care about the environment. Their reaction to death and abuse is blank-eyed indifference. They are physically and spiritually malleable. They not only adopt and internalize the demands of the dominant system as personal ambition, they believe this servitude makes them better than everyone else who hasn’t.

Absolutely IDEAL subjects.

You, on the other hand, are not the ideal subject.

You want to live in a high-trust society. You would shed tears if someone tried to cut down the apple tree you climbed as a child to build a data center. You want to see and experience beauty. You want your own space. You have an expectation that your living conditions will improve over time. You would not be content to live in a room with 10 other people, work 16 hours per day for pennies, and eat cheap slop.

You are a liability. Just like the Burmese and Surinamese slaves were.

And as we continue to crawl deeper into this late capitalist hellscape, you and your silly little needs will come into increasing conflict with those of the system.

Thus, you WILL be replaced by people far easier to control and far less concerned about their own welfare or the welfare of everyone and everything around them.

… Unless you do something about it. But the system has already locked-in that you won’t, and that you’ll just sort of fade into nothingness, distracted by meaningless comforts and terrified of the uncertainty of change.

So “why are Indians in [wherever]?”

Because you are about to not be.

[Kultokrat Hubert Ziółkowski @hubert_kowski]

@BolshevikCake No it was Germany and the west, we were not at fault in any way

[Brian McDonald @BrianMcDonaldIE]

There is no planet or alternate timeline where Poland, Latvia and Lithuania are culturally closer to Luxembourg and Switzerland than to Belarus, Russia and Ukraine.

[Mysz w Meblościance ⚢🏳️‍⚧️🌹🚩🚊🔰 #Owca2026 @Majkawscianie]

>polska prawie jedyna na niebiesko

[Spetsnaℤ 007 🇷🇺 @Alex_Oloyede2]

🇷🇺 The Russian Army dropped a flower at the Ukrainian controlled WW2 memorial in Kherson.

[Ohegao_sf @Oheva_sf]

Polska i Rosja pojawiły się niemal jednocześnie i często zagrażały wzajemnemu istnieniu. Patrząc na całą historię wojen, podziałów i powstań, nagle pojawiają się myśli, a dlaczego nie uścisnąć dłoni? Oboje zasługują na szacunek dla siebie

[Kultokrat Hubert Ziółkowski @hubert_kowski]

"but if everyone pressed re-" they won't. It's a pointless hypothetical as a cope about the guilt of treason.

You can chose red if you want but you have to acknowledge it's entirely for self-preservation reasons. Both buttons are 'logical' choices but different priorities.

[Kultokrat Hubert Ziółkowski @hubert_kowski]

Blue is correct if anyone wonders. There is no nationalism and nation without collectivism. What here is labelled as "suicidal empathy" is literally just civilisation, if you can't die for something beyond you than you can't ever change or preserve anything meaningful. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[Tim Urban @waitbutwhy]

Everyone in the world has to take a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press?

[Syed M Mehdi @SyedMMehdi]

13 ستمبر 1985 کو ایک گفتگو کے دوران معمر قذافی نے کہا:

"میری خامنہ ای سے پہلی ملاقات میں، دورانِ گفتگو انہوں نے 'Persian Gulf' کا لفظ استعمال کیا، جبکہ میں 'Arabian Gulf' کہتا تھا۔

میں نے ان سے پوچھا:
'کیا یہ مناسب ہے کہ عرب اور فارسی اس مسئلے پر آپس میں اختلاف کریں، اگر ہر کوئی صرف اپنی مرضی کا نام لیتا رہے؟'

خامنہ ای نے جواب دیا:
'خلیج کے دوسری طرف کے ممالک حقیقت میں عرب نہیں بلکہ امریکی کالونیاں ہیں۔ جس دن وہ آپ کی طرح انقلابی بن جائیں گے، میں سب سے پہلے اس دستاویز پر دستخط کروں گا جس میں اسے Arabian Gulf، Kuwaiti Gulf یا آپ کی پسند کا کوئی بھی نام دیا جائے۔ لیکن اس وقت ایسا کرنا ہمارے مفاد میں نہیں، کیونکہ اس سے خلیج امریکہ کے ایجنٹوں کے حوالے ہو جائے گی۔'

انہوں نے مزید کہا کہ وہ نام پر نظرثانی کے لیے تیار ہیں، لیکن صرف اسی صورت میں جب خطے کے حکمران انقلابی ہوں، نہ کہ امریکی اثر و رسوخ میں۔

قذافی کہتے ہیں:
'میں نے اس بات سے اتفاق کیا۔'

خامنہ ای نے مزید کہا:
'جب ہم دیکھیں گے کہ عرب سرزمین آزاد ہو رہی ہے، تو ہم سب سے پہلے "Persian Gulf" کا نام چھوڑنے کے لیے تیار ہوں گے، لیکن فی الحال بہتر ہے کہ اسے "Persian" ہی رہنے دیا جائے تاکہ اس کا تعلق ایرانی انقلاب سے رہے، بجائے اس کے کہ اسے ان عربوں کے حوالے کر دیا جائے جو امریکہ کے ایجنٹ ہیں۔'

قذافی نے کہا:
'ہمیں اسے "اسلامی خلیج" کہنا چاہیے اور اس مسئلے کو ہمیشہ کے لیے ختم کر دینا چاہیے۔'

خامنہ ای اس پر متفق ہو گئے۔
'یہی ہونا چاہیے۔ ہمیں اپنے ایرانی بھائیوں کے ساتھ اتحاد کرنا چاہیے اور اس معمولی مسئلے پر جھگڑا نہیں کرنا چاہیے۔'