@Flyingfishtrump@Surok_The_Blade@mirrorsbreath@Dobrokhotov Сейчас стандартный мед. протокол что если укус зафиксирован сразу и клещ провёл на коже меньше 24 часов то антибиотиков вообще не дают. У нас очень большая проблема с т.н. оленьими клещами - они гораздо меньше их сложно сразу обнаружить, выглядят как маленькая родинка.
@mirrorsbreath@Dobrokhotov Круто. Часто именно из-за нехарактерно проявления или отсутствия видимой реакции на укус часто задерживают лечение - хорошо, что вы на этой ранней стадии поймали, должно всё нормально пройти, без осложнений. Здоровья!
@Dobrokhotov@mirrorsbreath Там пятно очень характерное, т.н. bullseye - мишень. Красная точка, вокруг белое кольцо, снаружи красное. 🎯
Если проявляется - сразу к доктору и на антибиотики. Бывают вариации не такие характерные, иногда вообще нет проявления, но если bullseye - 100% Лайм.
@arronHimself69 @westcucktom4 @TiffaniMarie483 @Bannedforlife69 @Rainmaker1973 Decade of commerical UAV experience.
1. FAA rules apply to all airspace.
2. Immediate airspace refers to building permits, not flight operations.
3. There are specific FAA restrictions about operating near certain infrastructure, as well as large gatherings.
@arronHimself69 @TiffaniMarie483 @Bannedforlife69 @Rainmaker1973 You can spend about 5 minutes to figure out for yourself that that's not the case, or f around and find out the consequences. In 10 yr we lost two commercial UAVs over properties where landowners had their own interpretation of FAA rules, it was an expensive education for them.
@TiffaniMarie483 @Data_point_Matt@Rainmaker1973 There are certain things that are not covered by it, for example, you cannot spy on people using a drone in their airspace or drop anything, including spraying chemicals. But that falls under illegal surveillance and trespassing.
@TiffaniMarie483 @Data_point_Matt@Rainmaker1973 Oh it's totally one of those hard to believe but brutally direct application of federal law. Basically any drone over 250 grams and up to 55 lbs must be FAA-registered. But once it has an FAA number, it's a commercial aircraft. Bringing it down is like shooting as an airliner.
@TiffaniMarie483 @Data_point_Matt@Rainmaker1973 No, that's a huge misconception (although it seems logical). This misunderstanding leads to dozens of incidents like the one in the video and then total shock when people land in court and are handed tough fines and even jail time.
@c07971994@Rainmaker1973 FAA owns all airspace. The dude just threw a stick at a commercial aircraft and caused it to crash. He is beyond fucked - fines, legal fees, and possible jail time is a lot to pay for failing to look up FAA rules.
@Redsfan1961 @Rainmaker1973 Immediate reach applies to building and structures, not throwing a stick at a drone in FAA airspace which is ALL airspace. A lot of people are confused about this leading to dumb decisions like the one in the video that result in heavy legal fees and possible jail time
@RobertJJungle@Rainmaker1973 Fair game as long as you're willing to risk jail time, pay for the drone, and any associated damages.
As long as the UAV is operated within FAA rules, it's the same as shooting at an airplane.
FAA rules apply to ALL airspace regardless of altitude or land ownership.
@Dobrokhotov@lpr_tw@chich_8 Ну он про 37-й писал, тогда уже всё оружие у населения давно изъяли (почему-то..), только топоры остались. Думаю, что если бы легальными и доступным были револьверы, то он бы написал про револьверы.
ЗЫ Я сторонник ограничения огнестрельного оружия.