@EricConk32@MoyaSarner@chris_cannida@JonathanShedler CBT has schemas. Psychoanalysis has the unconscious', both of which seem to converge with contemp. neuroscience, eg predictive processing. We develop implicit/unconscious models which then become filters through which we see/understand our world.
@EricConk32@MoyaSarner@chris_cannida@JonathanShedler You seem to be moving the goal posts on falsifiable tx interventions/outcomes (as in your example here with CBT) vs. falsifiable theoretical constructs or concepts.
@KemtrupTweets@EricConk32 I for one appreciate this back and forth and think it echoes common criticisms of PsA, so I think itโs an important discussion. Even if frustrating to have.
The great @oliverburkeman on AI, creativity, and psychotherapy:
"The point about a good novel produced by a human (or a song, or painting, or dare I say it, an email newsletter) isnโt that only a human *could ever* have produced it. Itโs that a human *did in fact* produce it."
I hate to break this to folks, but personality is not synonymous with scores on a "big five" questionnaire
Don't make mistake of conflating a particular metric with the phenomenon itself
This is one reason why, as they say in stats 101, a study cannot prove the null hypothesis
@DrGipps Fair to say that there is far too much pseudo-mentalization about infant experience in PsA? Or just too much extrapolation to adults from infancy? Both?