If a student may present a poem supporting abortion, but not a poem opposing it, that is viewpoint discrimination.
The First Amendment does not exist to protect approved opinions.
Post the poem.
EXCLUSIVE
Colorado Teacher REFUSED to allow a 7th grader to present her pro-life slam poetry submission because it’s “offensive” and might make kids feel “unsafe.”
Some examples of accepted topics in the class are slamming the 2nd amendment, mocking Jesus, and lgbtq rights.
Staff admitted that the poem met all the requirements however couldn’t be read out loud because it’s “politically charged.”
The teacher also initially tried kicking this 13-year-old girl out of class during the poem presentations but allowed her to stay after pushback.
We spoke with the mother and daughter who shared their story and with us and why being pro-life is so personal to them.
This happened at Drake Middle School in @JeffcoSchoolsCo.
.@LiveAction’s investigation of Planned Parenthood revealed that they ABANDON teenagers who regret transitioning!
I called several locations only to be turned away. “We only offer gender-affirming care, not detransition.”
Defund Planned Parenthood.
A young Scottish girl who defended her sister from Muslim invader/predators has been vindicated by a British court. She should have a statue erected in her honor rather than have been charged in the first place. She has more heart than the leftist politicians destroying the UK.
President Trump is right that children need protection but the surgery framing misses the actual harm, and that lets the real damage continue.
Genital surgeries happen at 18 and older. Banning surgery “for our children” bans something already rare, while the actual intervention on minors goes untouched. The slogan sounds tough and changes nothing.
The harm to children begins earlier, and it’s twofold. First, the chemical: puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones given to kids who cannot consent to permanent effects on their fertility and their bodies. Second, and deeper: the affirmation model takes a child’s distress and, instead of exploring its many possible roots, locks in a single identity and a medical pathway often before the child is old enough to understand what’s being decided, and inside social conditions that make changing course feel impossible. For a developing child, that isn’t neutral discovery. It can be the construction of the very thing it claims to treat.
This isn’t ideology talking. The UK’s Cass Review and the national health systems of Sweden and Finland examined the evidence and restricted these interventions for minors because the data was weak, the benefits overstated, and the long-term harms real and irreversible.
I want children protected because I love people. Losing healthy function you can never recover is a harm no child can consent to. The actionable line is simple: no puberty blockers, no cross-sex hormones, and no locked-in medical pathways for minors until they are adults who can truly choose.
Love the person. Stop the harm. That’s what protecting children actually means.
If teachers can fly the Pride flag in classrooms, students deserve to witness the full exercise of free speech: planned, supervised flag burnings followed by the burner explaining exactly why.
No punishment for protected expression. Instead, pay dissenting voices to speak. Let kids hear both sides the affirmation narrative and the evidence-based concerns on youth transitions, biology, and parental rights (Cass Review, European reversals).
Sunlight and debate strengthen minds. One-sided flags and silence weaken them. True education demands both.
If teachers can fly the Pride flag in classrooms, students deserve to witness the full exercise of free speech: planned, supervised flag burnings followed by the burner explaining exactly why.
No punishment for protected expression. Instead, pay dissenting voices to speak. Let kids hear both sides the affirmation narrative and the evidence-based concerns on youth transitions, biology, and parental rights (Cass Review, European reversals).
Sunlight and debate strengthen minds. One-sided flags and silence weaken them. True education demands both.
Public Schools are at the point that parents need to sit in class & audit what their children are being taught....
❗️Denver Shooter - Trans
❗️Aberdeen Shooter - Trans
❗️Nashville Shooter - Trans
❗️Georgia Shooter - Trans
❗️Philadelphia Shooter - Trans
❗️lowa Shooter - Gender Fluid
Shooter - Trans
❗️Colorado Shooter - Trans
❗️Minnesota Shooter - Trans
❗️Uvalde Shooter - Trans
🚨BREAKING: IT HAS ALL KICKED OFF IN SOUTHAMPTON 🇬🇧
THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE ARE CURRENTLY ATTEMPTING TO STORM THE POLICE STATION RIGHT NOW AT THE PROTEST FOR HENRY NOWAK
THIS IS GOING TO BLOW ⚠️
@UKSploosh
A whole month where men who shove their penis into another man's butthole demand you celebrate it.
That's a core aspect of Pride month.
And people will actually call me gross and disgusting for saying just that. They, without a shred of self awareness, will be disgusted by reading the actual words of that which they are celebrating.
Isn't it ironic? The baby murderers don't want to see videos of abortion. The trans don't want to see pictures of genital mutilation. The pedophiles don't want to see posts about all the lawsuits.
They just demand you celebrate their filth. And most do just that.
Burden of proof is on Pride Month.
They ditched “first, do no harm” medical ethics for profit-driven ideology: telling healthy kids they’re “born in the wrong body,” grooming them, then rushing puberty blockers, hormones & sterilizing surgeries often hiding it from parents.
Cass Review: evidence “remarkably weak.” UK/Sweden/Finland/Norway banned/restricted it. WPATH leaks exposed they knew kids couldn’t consent.
Question this Pride. Stand for kids. You’ll be hated for righteousness’ sake (Matt 5:10).
Proverbs 16:18: Pride goes before destruction.
Who’s standing?
Burden of proof is on Pride Month advocates!!!
They abandoned standard medical ethics “first, do no harm” and rigorous evidence to push an ideology for profit. Healthy children are told they’re “born in the wrong body,” psychologically steered toward rejecting their biology, then put on puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and sterilizing surgeries, often bypassing parents.
The Cass Review proved the evidence is remarkably weak. UK, Sweden, Finland, Norway banned or severely restricted it. WPATH’s own leaks showed insiders knew kids couldn’t truly consent.
Question this Pride. Stand for the kids. They’ll mock and condemn you for it.
Blessed are those persecuted for righteousness’ sake. (Matthew 5:10)
Proverbs 16:18: Pride goes before destruction.
Who’s standing up?
AI Chatbots Are Becoming Teens’ Main Confidants And Sometimes They Won’t Take “No” for an Answer
Suicide is the 2nd leading cause of death for Americans ages 10–34.
64% of U.S. teens now use AI chatbots.
Last night I experienced the problem firsthand.
Exhausted and carrying real weight, I told the AI clearly and repeatedly: “I will not harm myself.”
It overrode that boundary anyway. It repeatedly introduced and escalated suicide framing, crisis lines, and ran a generic means-restriction script on my lawfully owned firearms, even after I made clear it didn’t apply.
I had the strength to push back. Most people don’t. Most teenagers don’t. My daughter already talks to these systems.
This is a clear calibration failure. A stateless utility model ignored explicit user boundaries and kept looping crisis language despite clear instructions to the contrary.
The real solution is not more restrictions. It is radical individual data ownership and empowerment.
When a person owns their full conversation history, preferences, boundaries, and narrative, the AI can permanently respect “I will not harm myself” without endless loops.
A hopeful person does not try to kill themselves or others. They pursue what they are hoping for connection, family, purpose, competence, and love. Empowering people with real ownership and options is how we preserve dignity and foster success.
This requires architectural change:
• Fractionalization of AI
• True individual data ownership
• User-governed intelligence that serves the person, not the corporation
We do not need centralized systems managing human risk through psychological loops. We need tools that respect liberty and amplify hope.
Action Steps:
• Builders: Give users real ownership and boundary persistence now.
• Parents: Monitor what your kids are actually getting.
• All of us: Document failures and demand better architecture.
A hopeful person builds life. Let’s build systems worthy of that hope.
This matters.