Humdhan

[Humdhan @HumdhanAbdullah]

@laporcelaiine Subhanallah

[Humdhan @HumdhanAbdullah]

@benshapiro Nah you hold that title

[Humdhan @HumdhanAbdullah]

@AgainNever2 @dannyphiltalk @GodLogic_GL @mohammed_hijab Because you don’t even know what invalid means. No one has the patience to provide you a lesson here.

Read chapters 2-3 of this to get a grasp of it:

Susanna Epp's DISCRETE MATHEMATICS WITH APPLICATIONS

[Jake Brancatella @MMetaphysician]

CHALLENGE FOR TRINITARIANS: IS IT LOGICALLY POSSIBLE THAT THERE ARE 3 GODS?

1 There are exactly three gods, counted by classical identity, if and only if there are exactly three distinct things that are God, and nothing else is God.

2 The Father is God.

3 The Son is God.

4 The Holy Spirit is God.

5 The Father is not identical to the Son.

6 The Father is not identical to the Holy Spirit.

7The Son is not identical to the Holy Spirit.

8 Anything that is God is identical to the Father, the Son, or the Holy Spirit.

9 Therefore, there are exactly three distinct things that are God, and nothing else is God.

10 It is logically and linguistically possible to interpret “God” with a count-noun reading and count its instances by classical identity.

11 If it is logically and linguistically possible to interpret “God” with a count-noun reading and count its instances by classical identity, and there are exactly three distinct things that are God and nothing else is God, then it is logically and linguistically possible that there are exactly three gods, counted by classical identity.

12 Therefore, it is logically and linguistically possible that there are exactly three gods, counted by classical identity.

Definition: C_I^*(G) = “G is interpreted with a count-noun reading of ‘God’, and its instances are counted by classical identity”

◇ₗₗ = it is logically and linguistically possible that
(i.e., consistent with the laws of logic AND a legitimate use of language)

(1) N_I(G,=3) ↔ ∃x∃y∃z(Gx ∧ Gy ∧ Gz ∧ x ≠ y ∧ x ≠ z ∧ y ≠ z ∧ ∀w(Gw → (w = x ∨ w = y ∨ w = z)))

(2) Gf
(3) Gs
(4) Gh
(5) f ≠ s
(6) f ≠ h
(7) s ≠ h

(8) ∀w(Gw → (w = f ∨ w = s ∨ w = h))

(9) ∃x∃y∃z(Gx ∧ Gy ∧ Gz ∧ x ≠ y ∧ x ≠ z ∧ y ≠ z ∧ ∀w(Gw → (w = x ∨ w = y ∨ w = z)))

(10) ◇ₗₗ C_I^*(G)

(11) ◇ₗₗ C_I^*(G) ∧ (9) → ◇ₗₗ N_I(G,=3)

(12) ◇ₗₗ N_I(G,=3)

P. S. You don’t get to rule out an interpretation just because it leads to an unwanted conclusion. You have to show it is linguistically or logically impossible or admit that on the Trinity it is possible that there are 3 gods.

[Humdhan @HumdhanAbdullah]

@LazyPhilosophia @MMetaphysician Just a pathetic dodge

[Danny @dannyphiltalk]

The exchange on the Trinity between @GodLogic_GL and @mohammed_hijab was disappointing, and I'm probably more disappointed in Hijab. GL should have been crushed on account that (1) he's not really invested in learning philosophy or about the LPT and (2) the Trinity is obviously nonsense - which gives Hijab a significant advantage despite any differences in intelligence. Instead, we got an avalanche of confusion and grand-standing from both of them. No one benefited, and there was a point where I just had to turn it off.

[Humdhan @HumdhanAbdullah]

@zikspeace @dannyphiltalk @GodLogic_GL @mohammed_hijab No, you’re just dumb bro. Hate to break it to you.

[Humdhan @HumdhanAbdullah]

@AgainNever2 @dannyphiltalk @GodLogic_GL @mohammed_hijab Ah yes, an argument from the guys who can’t complete an argument without asking their interlocutor a question.

You guys are just a waste of time.

[Humdhan @HumdhanAbdullah]

@kevinolearytv New York is going to be fine.

[Humdhan @HumdhanAbdullah]

@JakeRammos Obama

[Humdhan @HumdhanAbdullah]

@MarketPalmer_ They’d lose me

[Humdhan @HumdhanAbdullah]

@Jefffeldman @Jamie_Weinstein You think he’s going to be ok?? 😢

[Humdhan @HumdhanAbdullah]

@benshapiro It’s not hideous. No penny is ever earned. Not by the poor. Not by the rich.

You’re hideous.

[Dr. Omar Suleiman @omarsuleiman]

Israel just put me on a top 10 list.

Here is my response:

https://t.co/X46pDL5Z2S

[Humdhan @HumdhanAbdullah]

@dickclucas Do you think he’ll be ok?

[Humdhan @HumdhanAbdullah]

@FatimaBarkatula @mohammed_hijab Correct answer

[Humdhan @HumdhanAbdullah]

@Aslan_Bey_1 Did I make a claim that it MUST be “They/Them/Their”?

Or did I explain why such a translation wouldn’t be unreasonable?

YOU are the one saying it MUST be “He” so prove it.

[Humdhan @HumdhanAbdullah]

@SethDillon Even if you believe we are mistaken about Jesus, how does that mean we’re lying about him, dumbass? You’re just a thug.

[Humdhan @HumdhanAbdullah]

@IsSherryLong1 @goddek @RepMikeTurner Lower gas prices