Given that @dafuqboom_legit posted recently and is clearly active, I'd like to hear him explain why he hasn't responded to this request at all in over two months, even when it was reiterated in https://t.co/Nku2jwXWBU
@YogSothoth_Real So if I understand correctly, you eat cereal without sugar, but then add toppings to add sugar... why not just eat cereal with sugar and spend less money buying the toppings for the same effect? (That is, assuming cereal with sugar is less expensive than your method)
@CruzCrafter Unfortunately that would involve shipping and my brain is hardwired to avert that at every possible opportunity, so fuck it, everyone who isn't confirmed to not be ace is ace
@TITANSPEAK3R Boom has had the chance to speak out at the very least about his agreement with Invis about his paid amount, role, etc, yet still chooses not to agree to disclose the agreement. Alongside, BBB movement is lead by creators who clickbait/bait viewers, that's why it gets hate mainly
@TITANSPEAK3R Again, avoidance. Invis actively and publicly agreed to waiving or modifying the confidentiality they have with Boom to reveal their contract or agreement with him. However, they need Boom's consent to do that. Vital information is being withheld, cause of Boom.
Inviz Archive's goal has been narrative control, not truth, for a long time. The fact they ignore all evidence from https://t.co/Nku2jwXWBU on the (false) grounds that it's "out of context" should be enough to tell you they actively oppose evidence based reasoning.
@InvizArchive is not something we should be following. I have no problem with following bbb or lbs, but I expect that when you do, you make logical decisions/points. Inviz archive just silences people who speak their own opinions, doing what they hate inviz for.
#skibiditoilet
@MusakharAli Ibio's actions do not originate from poor mental health, but from him being a genuinely evil person. Santos' actions DO originate from poor mental health. We excuse poor mental health provided they apologize and make efforts to fix it (Santos did and is). We do not excuse evil.
@MusakharAli I know you read them because you saw the counterarguments (which are only accessible by reading the arguments themselves) so the only explanation for what you're saying is that you're being blatantly dishonest and know full well that the statements you're making are false
@MusakharAli We both know that's not true, you just want to ignore the counterarguments entirely like you did with https://t.co/Nku2jwXWBU because they're logical, directly target the points, and firmly debunk this false narrative you're trying to present.
@hunterpro34 Not to mention how they don't allow footage from the meetings to be released because of..."privacy" and "lack of prior agreement" even though INVIZ has fully agreed to redact faces. Instead of cooperating further to maintain privacy, they just arbitrarily refused to release it.