@BobRae48 Annexation? Maybe. 51st state? Not likely. There is not much chance the Republicans would vote in Congress to allow for the addition of a state that would almost certainly mean additional Democrat Senators and House Representatives and Electoral College votes.
@JohnRalstonSaul@JDCocchiarella The USA can certainly pass legislation to compel domestic publishers to only publish maps while adhering to changing the name of the Gulf. Other countries would not likely follow suit. Similarly Canada could rebrand the USA as LaLaLand. Would other countries follow? Mexico?
@CindymckayC@MargTokar The revenues from Crown owned corporations like Quebec Hydro and MB Hydro were once exempt from the calculation. But even with inclusion the fiscal capacity of those provinces still lags others. Even if resource revenues were excluded, AB would still not qualify
@CindymckayC@MargTokar When Equalization first started and resource revenues were not factored into eligibility, AB received payments. The hard earned dollars of all Canadians in all provinces and territories are taxed by the Federal Government.
@CindymckayC@MargTokar There is no line item in the AB, BC or SK budgets to pay for equalization. Equalization is a Federal program which makes payments to eligible provinces. FYI, Manitoba and some other provinces receive more per capita than Quebec. FYI, AB was also a beneficiary at one time.
@EarlThiessen @Dpietro83@PremierScottMoe Manitoba receives twice as much as Quebec in per capita equalization payments. Manitoba also has huge hydro production. But you think Quebec should be cut off. Why do you single out Quebec?
@hinz_tamara I think US banks are regulated by States and have not achieved the level of concentration and sophistication that we see in federally regulated Canadian banks.