huwan

capricorn sun/hamiltonian moon/conquistador through cancelling/sensuous lover//— (he)ar/him

[huwan @hwanchojack]

Hello everyjuan

[huwan @hwanchojack]

@Zazzy3000 @ayojoestar it does convey information! it is used as a way to gauge the depth one might be willing to go into a convo with someone. if someone can’t do it i typically stay away because its usually someone immature and who is really judgemental! for eg. if someone looks down at the behaviour

[huwan @hwanchojack]

@confusionm8trix @dinosaur_info “basically everyone”

[huwan @hwanchojack]

@confusionm8trix @dinosaur_info you’ve clearly never met philosophy phd’s or your capacity for discernment of critical independent thinking isn’t very refined. lots of awful philosophy phds/professors out there

[huwan @hwanchojack]

@confusionm8trix @dinosaur_info funny you think saying it within academia makes it any less cringe lol

[huwan @hwanchojack]

@homolumen @ghostowlredux doesn’t Hegel argue that it’s precisely not outside of reach? isn’t that his critique of Kant, or am i misunderstanding

[huwan @hwanchojack]

@SolBrah thinking that there’s a difference between these two framings indicates you lack faith in gods omnipotence

[huwan @hwanchojack]

@AntoniusOhii the prince as a political work is fine and insightful for grasping an objective method for understanding state relations but ultimately it’s nothing one can’t gather today without reading it imo. it’s exceptional now for sociopaths because of its implications 4 interpersonal life

[huwan @hwanchojack]

@AntoniusOhii i mostly agree, i think most people that have read him outside of business bro sociopaths don’t read him as some despot but that doesn’t change the contemporary reality of how awful the fan base is. anyone advocating machiavellian principles is usually a sociopath

[huwan @hwanchojack]

@alecrobbins anime?

[huwan @hwanchojack]

@alecrobbins what’s flcl

[huwan @hwanchojack]

@Veteplpnga @yosoymichael they both compromised in their own ways and they both expressed investment in each other in their respective ways. no one was lucky to be with the other and no one was settling. there was a mutual recognition and their navigation of what that meant to one another

[huwan @hwanchojack]

@Veteplpnga @yosoymichael i believe the depiction of the style of relationship was done to accentuate the coalescence of seemingly discrepant forms of love. seeing this movie and thinking one guy being ugly and desperate is the crux of the film to me is insane idk. they were both ugly and beautiful ppl

[huwan @hwanchojack]

@Veteplpnga @yosoymichael regardless of intention, framing it that way seems reductive imo. not saying this is the thought of the tweet we are under but i can resonate with the criticism, perhaps for different reasons. criticism of casting choice is not the same as calling someone ugly lol.

[huwan @hwanchojack]

@Veteplpnga @yosoymichael i think that this person thought looking at it through the lens of ugly and hot is a vain over simplification of the move? if that’s the case then your interrogation makes just as little sense lol

[huwan @hwanchojack]

@LuxVigilans @philosophymeme0 also hegel doesn’t say this necessarily happens, he argues that the person in bondage is in a better place to realize their own freedom. the lords existence depends on the bondsman’s acknowledgement of their authority + are helpless to take care of themselves

[huwan @hwanchojack]

@LuxVigilans @philosophymeme0 it’s similar to a mother and their baby. the baby feels what they need but only the mother actually knows how to fulfill their needs. in a way the baby is the lord that dictates what the mother must do but the mother actually holds the power to find what will meet the needs