FIRST 24 HOURS REWARD FLASH on @TxFlow_L1
Trade $5K in Perps, Get $30 Fee Credit!
Campaign Period: Oct 26, 14:00 โ Oct 31, 23:59 UTC
Check out: https://t.co/DpnyPt80be
How to Join:
Click [Join] and connect your wallet.
Reach $5K in Perps Taker volume within 24 hours of joining.
Reward: $30 FC per user
First 100 qualified users only!
ANOTHER RED FLAG IN @CoinDCX'S SO CALLED "SWEEP FAILURE" AND ILLICIT ~16M USDT TRANSFER ๐จ
Onchain data shows nearly the entire ~15.82m USDT, drained from the dcxโs deprecated TQKJQ address, arrived in 88 transfers from a single wallet (TSC5MzYDNqtp3HDpqCNpTAs5pnT7wt4Hrd) between late January and March 2025.
Many of them were in the hundreds of thousands of USDT (which clearly shows its not user deposits; and no users should be dumb enough to send such large amount to deprecated wallet). (see image 1)
Coindcx says the balance built up because some users kept depositing to old addresses while an internal sweep failed, with the issue only spotted on Oct 22. That explanation is hard to square with 88 large transfers from one source. These concentrated inflows from TSC5M raise further questions about who was sending the funds and why.
One more thing; users donโt pick deposit addresses themselves; the exchange shows them in the app. A professional counterparty continuing bulk sends to a known compromised address also sits uneasily with normal practice.
Also, it was not only one wallet from usdt were sent; its a cluster of wallets which all belongs to Coindcx. So technically, its more than 16m usdt that were stolen from the exchange (see image 3)
Now coindcx first called the activity a false alarm, then admitted operational losses that it says it absorbed and credited to users without public detail on how many users were affected, the exact failure window, or independent verification of the credits.
Questions that remain unanswered:
1. who controls TSC5M? an undisclosed LP or the exchange itself?
2. the loss will be absorbed (which is 160 CRORE in INR bdw) but who is really paying it off? i dont think the exchange has balance in sheet to cover it.
3. If it really was deposit address (TQKJQ) and users were transferring unknowingly, why all the deposits suddenly stopped after the incident?
4. Why did the exchange removed wallets from its proof-of-reserve? (which is also hosted on third party website; who knows why)
@CoinDCX@smtgpt you can be fully transparent to actually ensure funds are safe unless ITS NOT! just stop lying.
I WOULD RECOMEND EVERY COINDCX USERS TO WITHDRAW FUNDS AS SOON AS POSSIBLE; UNTIL CLEAR UPDATES FROM THE TEAM!
Track:
TSC5M (LP??) - https://t.co/3orcm8w0YK
TQKJQ (dcx's claimed deprecated deposit wallet) - https://t.co/dkhTDsjLC2
TAg6S (where usdt were sent) -
https://t.co/flAJnu3nS2
cc @zachxbt@DarcyAri
this is true for most
that is why most cant be successful businessmen, or marketing folks, or founders, or journalists, or engineers
focus on your passion, work towards it, refine your skills, growww
@WebPsych3 paid marketing, influncers shilling that the wallet was not hacked and we should not worry, gautam gambhir who probably knows nothing about crypto but is the brand ambassador
need i say more?
lol
CoinDCX has NOT absorbed the $16m loss in the company's books
they have never made profits over the years, there's not 1 full year where they made money
with investor funds burning, it's the users who will lose their hard earned savings
withdraw all before it is too late
CoinDCX finally admitted the $16M loss
But the crazy part is it took them 3 days to admit it. On day 1, the CEO called it a rumour and said none of their addresses were affected.
Kinda funny how they think the community is fool and they can fool us this easily
I'll say it again, withdraw every single penny from these shady, low-tier exchanges.
Don't wait, if you love your money
@Mugsterofficial i know how much they got in funding, how much they lost in hacks, and how much they been losing every quarter because of stupid hires and poor marketing