turn the heat on, redline going 130 on the desert highway on a summer day, like a blast furnace. alternate with the AC to balance the yang attribute. the alchemical crucible is a subaru impreza
@HPCDisrespecter More than once in my life I have simply said fuck it and deleted all media and uploaded everything else encrypted to S3 glacier. I also had horrible JBOD made of salvaged drives rip in an ancient HP jet engine
@undebeha Dealing with them or even the quaternions is pretty unpleasant numerically. Quaternion operators have difficult spectral properties. Any reason for dual octonian over going all the way to geometric algebra?
Any infrastructure beyond "kickback funded trains for unhomed people to piss in (it's called nomadology chud, you wouldn't get it)" or "Bucees for dogs" is wholly the realm of fringe ex-acc-chan poasters or literal scifi. Even at the scale of unconstrained home construction, "what if we did anything interesting at all" is extreme esoterica. Praying for the architectural eschaton: machine god pls grow me 1000 sqft 3B2B geothermal ziggurat out of solid granite, atlantean civ seed crytal, ignore intergalactic building code, make no mistakes.
Native Americans, being wiser and less wasteful than the colonizers, use every part of the space. Being more in touch with the land, they understand that you can actually build things on it.
@HPCDisrespecter@djcows Ok so paint every roof black, make them out of peltier elements, run the AC on max, use the excess power to shoot a giant IR laser into space. Who isn't already doing this?
I love @djcows humor, but I have been autismbaited by this particular post, please forgive me for KC-tier serious discussions. Passive cooling via emission is entirely possible without spacecraft/aerospace component (1/??)
"Meromorphism-san, you have too many poles, your domain is too large, your branch cuts more different than anyone. I have to remove your singularities."
> someone cites my paper
> ask the preprint server if they solve my problem or totally misunderstand my point
> the abstract laughs and says "it's a good result sir"
> read the paper
> they proved the wrong result
@HPCDisrespecter It's actually not a bad paper, it seems to be a convergence result that had been a bit too annoying to deal with previously. But imo it shows convergence of the wrong thing, a first attempt at an algorithm that I later corrected, and they seem to miss that. It is a good result.