This is often held up by antivaxxers who fail, COMPLETELY, to understand what is being said.
If you don’t understand how PCR is done, this deliberate misconstrued snippet can be powerful.
It’s also a bollocks antivax conclusion.
@Hypothesis@benmooreau@NickHudsonCT Not even Kerry Mullis, the inventor of the PCR test believes his invention can be used to see if someone is sick or has a virus in it, no obviously not, PCR is the foundation of the scam
@BigMoperson@TakethatCt@brian_tietz I love how your immediate action was to ask Grok and then delete because you don’t have access. In the same time I found this, verified it and present it to you.
Stop being so damn lazy.
https://t.co/zWOzP3HvkY
@BigMoperson@TakethatCt@brian_tietz Actually that is incorrect but since when do antivaxxers care about accuracy. Clickbait and fearporn are far more fun…
@TakethatCt@brian_tietz@BigMoperson Have you noticed that antivaxxers can never admit they are wrong and always seem to think some random social media video clip equates to experience? I swear the Dunning Kruger is getting worse lately..
Antivaxxers have to demonize anyone who disagrees with them, calling them “asleep”, murders, pedophiles, all manner of insults - it’s the only way they can defend their ideology from evidence based criticism. Fiction upon fiction.
@strike123__ You don’t think I should mock people who pretend to be experts because they spent 5min on YouTube and now think they are experts on vaccines?
What about flat earthers? Those who think viruses don’t exist?
I should let them be because they are “harmless”?
@Epictets1@DJSpeicher@stkirsch They often don’t work either, causing increased harm and are marketed by people with no liability either. Fair is fair..