Rio Ferdinand on Neymar coming off the bench to score against Norway:
🗣"Looking back now, you'd have to question the decision to leave Neymar on the bench. These are the games where your biggest players make the difference.
The moment he came on, Brazil looked more threatening. He gave the team belief, demanded the ball and changed the tempo of the game.
Then the pressure came, and he stepped up to take the penalty with complete confidence. That's what elite players do,they embrace the biggest moments.
When you have someone with Neymar's quality, you want him on the pitch from the first whistle because one moment can change everything."
@pretademaiss Desrespeitado? So por um bando de fuleiro que nem tu. O cara é uma lenda pro mundo todo. Sempre será lembrado como um ídolo. Até no seu ultimo jogo de uma copa, foi o unico a converter um gol. Enquanto tu so fala merda
🇧🇷🚨Roberto Carlos on Neymar Jr. crying after the final whistle:
🗣️ “I felt so bad seeing Neymar Jr. cry after the final whistle. He’s the type of player who would’ve given absolutely everything for Brazil. Maybe the coach didn’t fully believe in him, but when he came on, he still showed his composure and quality.”
🗣️ “I’ve always admired Neymar and everything he’s has achieved in football. The level he’s reached is something very few players will ever experience.”
🗣️ “Winning the World Cup is special, but it doesn’t define a player’s entire career. Some of the greatest players in history never lifted it.”
🗣️ “Trust me, generations will still remember Neymar as one of the greatest footballers to ever wear the Brazil shirt. His legacy was built a long time ago, not today.”
🗣️ “For me, he’s a legend, no matter what. Nothing that happened today will ever change that.”
Não me surpreende o Neymar ter arrumado essa briga, ele é o único dessa seleção que nunca aceita a derrota e luta até o fim.
Inclusive é auto explicativo ele chamando a responsabilidade e batendo o pênalti no fim. Só ele fez isso nos últimos 15 anos.
@Tatawerneck@latencianociva Te admiro muito, cara! Vc é foda. Bora fazer uma festa junina la em curicica, eu divido a conta e nao vou de novo como penetra na sua festa 😂 ❤️
@Tatawerneck@latencianociva Tudo q ce faz é bom. Fui na festa de vcs em curicica que tu sorteou os iphones pra equipe/produção e vcs ficaram ate o fim da festa bem cansados mas queriam que eles se sentissem importantes. Os bastidores de ET tb foram especiais. Vcs sao brabos!!
@itolindoo Mas todo mundo percebeu q a jordana ia fazer isso mesmo, alias, ela ja estava fazendo antes do paredão, vi ela falando: "é Brasil to no monstro e no paredão" com expressão triste 🤣
Glenn Greenwald On Brazil's Alexandre De Moraes' Authoritarian Censorship Regime Targeting Elon Musk, Starlink, and 𝕏
Context and Situation:
In Brazil, Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes has initiated aggressive actions against X, compelling the platform to comply with censorship orders targeting political figures. The orders demand the removal of elected senators and congress members from the platform, actions which X has resisted due to their political motivation and lack of due process. In response, de Morais has threatened to arrest X executives in Brazil and demanded that X appoint a legal representative in the country to enforce these orders.
X’s Response:
Elon Musk, owner of X, announced the closure of all X offices in Brazil and the relocation of its executives outside the country, citing safety concerns. Despite this, de Morais issued a 24-hour ultimatum for X to comply with the censorship orders or face being blocked in Brazil entirely, leaving the platform inaccessible to all Brazilians except those using VPNs.
Legal and Political Maneuvers:
De Moraes’ demands are part of a broader trend in which authoritarian regimes exert control over online platforms to suppress dissent. This has extended beyond X, with the blocking of financial assets of Starlink, another Musk-owned company, despite no wrongdoing on its part. De Moraes’ actions align with increasing censorship efforts seen in Brazil and other nations, where governments seek to maintain control over public discourse by stifling opposition voices online.
Global Context and Implications:
This situation is part of a global pattern where governments, both in democratic and authoritarian states, are increasingly imposing stringent controls over internet platforms. These controls are often justified by claims of national security or the need to prevent misinformation, yet they effectively limit free speech and the exchange of ideas. The trend began intensifying around 2016, following political events like Brexit and the election of Donald Trump, which demonstrated the power of the internet in shaping public opinion independent of traditional media gatekeepers.
Conclusion:
The actions by Brazil’s Supreme Court, particularly those of Justice De Moraes, represent a significant threat to internet freedom. They illustrate how governments can leverage legal and economic pressures to force compliance with censorship demands, thus curtailing the ability of platforms like X to serve as open forums for public debate. This reflects a broader, concerning trend of increasing censorship and control over online spaces by governments worldwide, undermining democratic principles and the free exchange of ideas.
@ggreenwald Quotes:
"The indescribably authoritarian judge on the Brazil Supreme Court, Alessandra de Morais, who essentially runs the country, threatened X's Brazilian executives that they would immediately be arrested if X did not instantly comply with censorship orders to censor elected members of the Senate and the Congress.
"There's no due process provided, and these people have not been convicted of crimes. It's just this politically motivated judge ordering these people banned from the internet. X did not want to cooperate with that, so this threat was issued. We're going to arrest X executives inside Brazil unless you comply."
"It's expected, especially for Western companies, that they're not going to comply with authoritarian regimes and shut down all opposition. That is considered immoral. All of the authoritarian countries that we are taught to hate have had a constant conflict with big tech over its refusal to censor dissidents or opponents of the government, and now this is contaminating the Western world."
"In 2022, Elon Musk was awarded official commendations from Brazil's authorities for his benevolent act of providing free internet connections to many of the poorest areas in Brazil that the government hadn't been able to provide on their own. And yet, somehow, this judge, even though there's no finding that Starlink itself did anything wrong, has blocked Starlink's bank accounts in Brazil to punish X."
"It is genuinely remarkable the lengths to which not just Brazil but countries throughout the democratic world are now willing to go to prevent the internet from being a free exchange of ideas where human beings can organize freely and privately because they recognize that is the one threat to establishment power and the status quo ruling class prerogatives."
"This is happening in the ostensibly Western democratic world. I cannot do anything more in terms of words to express how extreme, how severe, and how dangerous this trend is."
Follow -> @ggreenwald & @SystemUpdate_
Caramba, a Amanda está simplesmente em 60 HORAS de plantão, ajudando as pessoas lá no hospital de Canoas, no Rio Grande do Sul.
60 horas dentro de uma UTI com apenas 3 médicos. Grandona! 👏
@emerzou A globo está ajudando em q exatamente? enquanto mente e oculta informações prejudicam o governo. Essas pessoas sabem q n tem clareza e q estão servindo de circo pra aumentar a audiência deles. Eles vivem uma dura realidade e tu aí com a bunda no sofá defendendo uma emissora lixo
Vocês já notaram que só muié feia e destruída enche o saco? É só pegar as bonitas, zero problema... no máximo são chatas; agora vai abraçar canhão! Deus me livre, xarope, purgante, um pé no saco. O grande problema da humanidade é a MUIÉ FEIA. E tenho dito!