@ANI They Don't have any pragmatic approach to life that's exactly why we such PR videos in circulation without actual impact in their respective jobs.
@ANI In India you don't meet someone who doesn't really consider a politician or a cricketer or an actor to be just another human being like them, this works in celebrity publicity PR as people feel this as an achievement to spend time or come in a video with the person.
@UnborrowedPen@akshit_goud Haha the topic escalated about someone speaking against Johaur to whether or not Khilji was a ruler or Invader. It doesn't matter whether he is a ruler or Invader or something else, the topic in discussion was about Johaur.
@akshit_goud@UnborrowedPen This is your stupidity to say I'm going to defend him just because I said there is nothing wrong in calling somebody ruler, the matter of discussion was simply whether or not he is a ruler or an invader, or a conquer. Which is exactly why I said stop shitting nonsense on X
@akshit_goud@UnborrowedPen Ruler has no positive connotation. If that's true then we wouldn't need to use leader, national representative, PM or president. Tyrant specifies an oppressive, cruel ruler who governs entirely through fear & severe injustice. If you don't want to use ruler add cruel before it.
@vajrayudha11 Very simple what modern day people fail to understand, back in the day clothes people used to wear were based on weather conditions. In modern talking about what clothes one is wearing is nothing but ignorance or lack of empathy.
@akshit_goud@UnborrowedPen An invader can become a ruler if they successfully conquer a territory and establish political authority over its people. Come on what nonsense are you guys spending time on posting about it.
@Mrsinha Why does that bother you? Because you're a Thick C who doesn't have the open mind for cultural assimilation, why does it itch you if someone else does?
@tathvamasi6 You're right, Hindus don't need anyone gyan, because they are full of gyan and know how to conduct themselves without someone else interfering. That's why Caste System prevails to this day, sati was last allowed in 1987, dowry, honor killings, discrimination based on caste...
@vikasindiafirst Propaganda peddlers are so casually calling Muslim people Hindus to drive their narrative. Remember when an incident really happens based on Communal hatred, nobody would believe you since you have fabricated a story based on incorrect information.
@madhukishwar Wish you had fact checked the claim. Problem with Right wing interpretations is that they don't see if the narrative is factually correct. Please verify before claiming something about someone.
@Woundedlioon 40,000 to 60,000 during middle ages not 4,00,000+ exaggerated numbers. Secondly, there is no acknowledgement of wrong doings in the past by Hindus for their own women. The last ever recorded Sati performed in India was 1987, when the British had long gone for 40 years.