Here is what actually happened in Montreal: A gunman opened fire on police outside a hotel in Côte-des-Neiges. He killed Const. Mohamed Lamine Benredouane, seriously wounded another officer and was then shot dead by police.
Michel Mizrahi, a 68-year-old civilian, was caught in the crossfire. The investigation into whose bullet killed him remains ongoing.
Authorities concluded that this was not a terrorist attack. Police indicated that Montreal’s Jewish community and Chabad were not deliberately targeted. The gunman reportedly left behind a manifesto steeped in incel grievance, misogyny and hostility toward police.
You would know none of that from these posts.
@LizzySavetsky announced that a Jewish man had been “murdered by a terrorist.” @RabbiPoupko declared that “terror struck” a Jewish neighbourhood. @Saul_Sadka went further and simply invented that Chabad had been targeted, then blamed “IRGC propagandists.”
They straight lied.
They took the fact that Mizrahi was Jewish and died near Jewish institutions, then manufactured the rest: the target, the motive and the political enemy.
They wanted an 'Islamist' terror story. They wanted a Muslim, Palestinian or Iranian villain they could blame before anyone even knew what had happened.
Why are these people so thirsty to portray their own community as the target of murderous violence?
Because the imagined attack gives them political ammunition. It allows them to inflame Jewish fear, demonize Muslims and Palestinians, and smear their ideological enemies—all while pretending to speak in the language of grief
Diabolical.
Iran has closed the Strait of Hormuz. Trump and the Zionist regime are refusing to implement the memorandum of understanding and are persisting with the occupation and bloodshed in Lebanon. Should the genocide continue, the Islamic Republic will take further action.
Rescue teams and first responders trying to reach 2 kids trapped under rubble in Harouf, Nabatieh region, after an Israeli bombing killed many of their family members.
South Lebanon is being attacked heavily now, with civilians being forced to evacuate again.
The 14-clause US-Iran MoU:
1. The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran and their allies in the current war by signing this MoU, declare the immediate and permanent termination of military operations on all fronts, including in Lebanon, and undertake from now on not to initiate any war or any military operation against each other, and to refrain from the threat or use of force against each other, and ensuring the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Lebanon. Final deal will confirm the permanent termination of the war on all fronts, including in Lebanon, and other provisions of this paragraph.
2. The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran undertake to respect each other's sovereignty and territorial integrity and to refrain from interfering in each other's internal affairs.
3. The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran commit to negotiating and achieving the final deal in maximum 60 days, extendable with mutual consent.
4. Immediately upon the signing of this MoU, the United States of America will begin the removal of its naval blockade and any disturbances or impediments against the Islamic Republic of Iran, and will fully end the naval blockade within 30 days. During this period, the traffic of vessels will be in proportion to the numbers of pre-war traffic being restored by the Islamic Republic of Iran. The United States of America further undertakes to remove its forces from the proximity of the Islamic Republic of Iran within 30 days after the final deal.
5. Upon the signing of this MoU, the Islamic Republic of Iran will make arrangements using its best efforts for the safe passage of commercial vessels with no charge for 60 days only from the Persian Gulf to the Sea of Oman and vice versa. The traffic of commercial vessels will immediately start, and considering the need for removing the technical and military obstacles and demining by the Islamic Republic of Iran, will be instated within 30 days. The Islamic Republic of Iran will conduct dialogue with the Sultanate of Oman to define the future administration and maritime services in the Strait of Hormuz in discussion with other Persian Gulf littoral states in line with the applicable international law and the sovereign rights of coastal states of the Strait of Hormuz.
6. The United States of America undertakes with regional partners to develop a definitive, mutually agreed plan with at least $300 billion for the reconstruction and economic development of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The mechanism for the implementation of this plan will be finalized as part of a final deal within 60 days.
All required licenses, waivers and permissions needed for the relevant financial transactions will be granted by the United States of America.
7. The United States of America undertakes to terminate all types of sanctions against the Islamic Republic of Iran, including the United Nations Security Council resolutions, i.e. IAEA Board of Governors resolutions and all unilateral US sanctions, primary and secondary, in an agreed-upon schedule as part of the final deal. The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States of America acknowledge the critical importance of the sanctions-termination issue abovementioned, and expressed their intentions to immediately address these issues in the negotiations, in order to achieve mutual agreement on them.
8. The Islamic Republic of Iran reaffirms that it shall not procure or develop nuclear weapons. The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran have agreed to resolve the disposition of stockpiled enriched material, pursuant to a mechanism that will be mutually agreed upon in accordance with the schedule mentioned in Paragraph Seven, with the minimum methodology to be downblending on site under the supervision of the IAEA.
❗️Nabavian: My objection is that in the nuclear section, Iran keeps giving America written guarantees, but America does not give equal guarantees on future sanctions.
I’ll read it. Honestly, this is where a person becomes very upset.
And this too was the proposal of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Because I have several versions; it kept going back and forth. They say, “None of these is the final version you have.” Fine… but I compared them. Every time we submitted it and it changed, we retreated.
“The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States of America agree to resolve all nuclear-related issues, including the commitment not to build nuclear weapons, enrichment, highly enriched materials, and the options related to them, during negotiations over the final agreement.”
They asked us to explicitly say we will not build a bomb. We said: “Here, fine, we’ll do it quickly.”
Nonetheless, we should not have done this, Why? Because on paper, America’s concerns about the future have been addressed. But why did they not come and address our concerns about sanctions… future sanctions?
In the previous draft version, it said:
“The Islamic Republic of Iran once again emphasizes that it will never produce nuclear weapons.”
We gave this to America. They said: “This is not enough. This is not what we want.”
So what else should we write?
They said: “You must write that you will neither produce it, nor acquire it, nor buy it, nor should it ever come into your hands.”
We said: “Fine, put it in.”
Now I’ll read this clause:
“The Islamic Republic of Iran once again emphasizes that it will never produce or acquire nuclear weapons.”
This is the Islamic Republic’s proposal.
Then…
“The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States of America have agreed… to resolve the status of the stockpiles of HEU through a mechanism agreed upon by both parties, and to determine the fate of enrichment and other nuclear-related issues agreed upon by both sides, including by taking into account the needs of the Islamic Republic of Iran, based on a satisfactory framework in an agreement.”
What does this mean?
It means the fate of enrichment and other nuclear-related matters must be placed inside a framework that satisfies America. We must have America’s satisfaction.
My question is: what are “nuclear-related matters”? Radiopharmaceuticals? Medicine? Desalination plants? … nuclear agriculture? The industries we have in the nuclear field? Electricity production? We have electricity shortages now and want to build reactors…. But here, we have committed that all of these must be within a framework that has America’s approval.
Even more concerning, America added that Iran’s enriched material must at minimum be diluted under IAEA supervision and American considerations.
“The Islamic Republic of Iran once again emphasizes that it will never produce or acquire nuclear weapons. The Islamic Republic of Iran and the USA have agreed to resolve the status of the stockpiles of enriched materials through a mechanism agreed upon by both parties…
…which will at minimum involve the dilution of all nuclear material on site, under the supervision of the IAE and under American considerations.”
This is exactly America’s demand.
These are things Araghchi should explain to the people: Why are America’s demands being presented in the language of the Islamic Republic of Iran?
A speech from 2013 that still echoes in our minds
"For 60 years, since the 1953 coup, whenever Iranian officials, trusted Americans on any issue, they have suffered a blow"
Nothing less than avenge of his blood, which is the removal of that tumor from our region is acceptable
Iran’s DepChairman of the Parliament’s National Security Commission, Nabavian, in an interview with SNN:
The texts released about the MoU in the media are not complete, and are just excerpts.