Demarco Moore

I’m here for: Laughs | Sports | SEO | Writing ✍🏽

[Demarco Moore @iam__demo]

@CazTheTitan I get the logic. I just don’t think it’s lazy to question a player’s upside in the top 4. And newsflash, the draft doesn’t end after the first round lol. They had 8 picks to get Cam weapons. And they clearly were prepared to trade back up. So, more reasons not to reach.

[Demarco Moore @iam__demo]

@CazTheTitan And your take is what? Explain why TATE, not any WR, is worth No. 4 overall without using the lazy talking points of the talking heads of positional value or how much money WRs make. I’ll wait. Like i said, he’s good, but No. 4 was a reach IMO.

[Demarco Moore @iam__demo]

@That_Guy_London @CazTheTitan That’s fair. You brought up JJ, so I was responding to that. I think production matters, and the fact that he went top-5 as an OSU WR with sub 1K numbers all 3 years is concerning. The only pass rusher I would’ve been alright with at 4 was Bailey, but he and Love were gone.

[Demarco Moore @iam__demo]

@CazTheTitan Your opinion of his value doesn't change mine. I was responding to calling one of the reasons for my opinion, the fact that he wasn't a WR1 in college, a lazy take. There are many other reasons. This draft is unlike others, so Tate at 4 is fair. I just had different preferences.

[Demarco Moore @iam__demo]

@titansfilmroom Can’t talk about Love on MCA, but you can talk about him here, Graver!!! 🫶🏽

[Demarco Moore @iam__demo]

@TheZachLyons Masterful! I’m sold!

[Demarco Moore @iam__demo]

@TheZachLyons @FWordsPod If you’re Borgonzi, and several top-10 teams have already signed FA RBs, does that increase the pressure to draft Love at No. 4 over an edge or wide receiver?

[Demarco Moore @iam__demo]

@damiEnbowman @xGlenNicex 2 things can be true. I acknowledge the state policy & disagree with the ruling. It contradicts the rule (2.11.11) referenced. Plus, the protest wouldn't have changed the outcome of the game b/c there was 8:54 left and Highland led. So, it was silly to undo all that for 1 point.

[Demarco Moore @iam__demo]

@damiEnbowman @xGlenNicex Sir, you relied on the press release for information and not the rule book. Whenever you officiated, the rule was different, so apologies if you don’t understand like the other gentleman.

[Demarco Moore @iam__demo]

@xGlenNicex @damiEnbowman @BobGreenburg You’ve consistently gotten this part wrong… lol the crew absolutely does not have to look at both teams’ scorebooks.. this is what you aren’t getting. Quote in the rule book where this is pointed out

[Demarco Moore @iam__demo]

@damiEnbowman @xGlenNicex There’s no fault to admit. Protest aside, the officials chose to take the official scorebook’s total, which is the correct way to adjudicate the rule if you know NFHS rules and mechanics lol

[Demarco Moore @iam__demo]

@xGlenNicex @damiEnbowman @BobGreenburg And furthermore, the correctable error procedure is in 2-10 lol, not 2-11… Once again, if there was a discrepancy in the score, the REFEREE shall accept the progressive team totals of the OFFICIAL scorebook. I’m confused on how this isn’t obvious to you, friend lol

[Demarco Moore @iam__demo]

@xGlenNicex @damiEnbowman @BobGreenburg First it was about the protest, now it’s about the correctable error procedure. I’ve conceded that sure according to Missouri’s association, the officials missed a protest. But, 2.11.11 is about the scorer, not the officials duties. lol

[Demarco Moore @iam__demo]

@xGlenNicex @damiEnbowman @BobGreenburg Agree to disagree. If you believe 1 point had a bearing on a game that still had 8:54 left, idk what to tell you. I implore you to read the correctable error procedure and truly seek understanding on whether or not officials have to compare the official and non official books lol

[Demarco Moore @iam__demo]

@xGlenNicex @damiEnbowman @BobGreenburg No need. I have physical copies and an understanding of the NFHS rules and basic game management….

[Demarco Moore @iam__demo]

@xGlenNicex @damiEnbowman @BobGreenburg friend, my issue was never about the appeal. My issue is 1) the officials followed the correctable error procedure 2) Missouri is allowing a HS game to be restarted based on a 1-point scorekeeping error in the 3rd QTR that had no bearing on the result.. that’s bad precedent.

[Demarco Moore @iam__demo]

@xGlenNicex @damiEnbowman @BobGreenburg And for the record….2.11 (scorers duties) is on page 21, 2.11.5 (referee’s duties during game) is on page 18, 2.9.10 (correctable errors) is on page 20… act accordingly my friend

[Demarco Moore @iam__demo]

@xGlenNicex @damiEnbowman @BobGreenburg We've reached the point of misunderstanding. I can't make you understand that you're misreading and misunderstanding the rule (2.11.11 either in your physical rule book, case book, and online), and that's ok, friend. The rule doesn't require officials to look at the away book.