Acee™

Dubai based. Life is a beach, be careful with the crabs!

[Acee™ @iamacq]

@GentriSenyo At laging nagyayakag mag bingo

[Acee™ @iamacq]

Stress na si Atty. Narvasa, ano?

[Acee™ @iamacq]

@migosaur Napaka kalat ng bebe na ituuuu

[Acee™ @iamacq]

I believe very weak ang opening. I believe walang pribilehiyong magnakaw dahil lang maraming bobo ang bumoto. I believe kailangan nang maimpeach ang ate Inday natin. And I zhank youuuu. #ImpeachmentTrial

[🇺‌ 🇳‌ 🇴‌ 🤓 @_MIGZ29]

ᴘᴜᴛᴀɴɢɪɴᴀ ʏᴜɴɢ sʜᴇɪʟᴀ sɪsᴏɴ.

ᴏᴘᴇɴɪɴɢ ᴘᴀ ʟᴀɴɢ ɴɪʏᴀ, ᴘᴀʟᴘᴀᴋ ɴᴀ ᴀɢᴀᴅ. ᴀɴᴏ ɴᴀᴍᴀɴ ᴋᴜɴɢ ᴍᴀs ᴍᴀʟᴀᴋɪ ᴀɴɢ ʙᴏᴛᴏɴɢ ɴᴀᴋᴜʜᴀ ɴɪ ɪɴᴅᴀʏ ᴋᴇsᴀ sᴀ ɴᴀᴋᴀᴜᴘᴏɴɢ ᴘᴀɴɢᴜʟᴏ? ʀᴇʟᴇᴠᴀɴᴛ ᴘᴀ ʙᴀ ʏᴀɴ?! ᴀɴᴏ, ᴘᴏʀᴋᴇ sɪʏᴀ ᴀɴɢ ᴘɪɴᴀᴋᴀᴍᴀᴅᴀᴍɪɴɢ ɴᴀᴋᴜʜᴀɴɢ ʙᴏᴛᴏ ɪʙɪɢ ʙᴀ sᴀʙɪʜɪɴ ɴᴏɴ ʟɪʙʀᴇ ɴᴀ sɪʏᴀ ᴍᴀɢɴᴀᴋᴀᴡ? ʙᴀᴡᴀʟ ɴᴀ ᴋᴡᴇsᴛʏᴜɴɪɴ? ʙᴀᴡᴀʟ ɴᴀ ᴘᴀᴛᴀʟsɪᴋɪɴ? ᴜᴋɪɴɴᴀᴍ ᴋᴇᴛᴅɪ. ᴛᴀʙʙᴇᴅ.

[Noemi L. Dado @momblogger]

When 12 senators were enough for a quorum , multiple times

The argument is NOT that
"12 is always enough."
The argument is more precise:

There is Senate practice and jurisprudential basis that quorum is not always a simple

"24 seats, therefore 13 forever" when some senators are abroad. on official mission, detained, or otherwise outside the Senate's practical coercive reach.

Source : Nutribun Republic https://t.co/57K22e4X7D

[Rappler @rapplerdotcom]

There may be three certainties in life: death, taxes, and Cayetano's inability to simply accept defeat.

[Nico B. Valderrama @nbvneverquits]

Ganito na lang.

I-assume natin na pumasok kahapon ang lahat ng 22 Senators na maaaring pumasok, dahil bayad naman sila ng taumbayan para pumasok.

May quorum? Yes.

Ilan ang kailangang bumoto para makagalaw ang Senado sa isang ordinary motion? 12, dahil iyon ang majority ng 22 Senators present. Ngayon, kung may motion si Senator Sotto na i-declare na bakante ang lahat ng posisyon sa Senado, at 12 Senators ang bumoto pabor, ano ang resulta?

Mababakante ang mga posisyon, kasama ang Senate Presidency. Ganito rin nabakante ang mga posisyon nung huling namuno si Senator Sotto at nag-motion si Senator Villanueva nung May 11, 2026 to declare all Senate leadership positions vacant.

Makakahalal ba sila agad ng Senate President? Hindi, kung walang makakuha ng 13 votes. The Constitution requires the Senate President to be elected by majority vote of all the Members of the Senate.

Pero makakahalal ba sila ng Senate President Pro Tempore? Yes.

Bakit? Dahil ang Constitution mismo ang nagsasabi na each House shall choose such other officers as it may deem necessary. Ang Senate President Pro Tempore ay hindi Senate President. Isa siyang ibang officer na kinikilala ng Rules of the Senate na dapat ihalal ng majority of all members of the Senate.

So ano ang dapat gawin? I-harmonize ang Constitution at ang Rules of the Senate.
Dapat ba ang interpretation ay hahayaang walang mahalal at maparalisa ang Senado? Hindi. A reading that leaves the Senate unable to organize or transact business should be avoided, because the Constitution contemplates a functioning Senate, not a paralyzed chamber.

Hindi hinalal si Senator Gatchalian bilang Senate President Pro Tempore para pumalit kay Senator Legarda personally. Hinalal siya para punan ang posisyong nabakante dahil sa lehitimong motion ni Senator Sotto.
Hindi rin siya nahalal na Senate President by 12 votes.

Ang nangyari ay ito: nabakante ang Senate Presidency; walang nahalal na Senate President dahil walang 13 votes; ngunit may valid election ng Senate President Pro Tempore under the Constitution and the Rules of the Senate. By operation of the Rules of the Senate, the Senate President Pro Tempore acts as Senate President while the office is vacant.
Hindi lamang sinabi ng Avelino v. Cuenco na hindi kasama sa pag-determine ng quorum ang mga Senador na hindi maaaring i-compel na umattend. Sinabi rin ng kaso na makatwiran na bigyang-bisa ang nais ng nakararami, lalo na sa pagpili ng mamumuno sa Senado, dahil ang pagpili ng Senate leadership ay nakadepende sa will of its members.

Higit sa lahat, hindi pinapayagan ng Constitution na paralisado ang kahit isang Kapulungan ng Kongreso. Kailangan pa ba talagang isulat iyon? Kahit ang taumbayan, hindi papayag na hindi magtrabaho ang mga pinapasweldo nila sa gobyerno.

Kahit grade 1 student, pumapasok nang walang bayad dahil alam niyang tungkulin niyang mag-aral. Ang mga senador pa kaya? Sila itong may malaking budget para kumuha ng magagaling na abogado na magpapaliwanag kung ano ang maaari at hindi maaaring gawin sa Senado.

[Acee™ @iamacq]

You are shame to this country, Allan Peter Cayetano!

[Jai Cabajar @jaicabajar]

Since ad hominem lang naman ang kaya gawin ni Marcoleta, then he should also know that he looks like a sad pug wearing a wig.

[Skill Bugate @BugateCate]

BAKIT MASTERFUL O FLAWLESS ANG EXECUTION NG MINORITY KONTRA SA MOTION NA RULE CHANGE NG MAJORITY!

Simulan po natin by realizing na in every senate match, it will be assessed or viewed in 3 ways and I will call them in this thread according to their number:

#1. Result - 1/

[Edwin Lacierda @dawende]

A CHEAP SHOT

Sen. Marcoleta’s attack on Sen. Risa Hontiveros that she did not know the rules because she is not a lawyer is a cheap shot, an argument from arrogance and credentialism at its worst.

One need not be a lawyer to recognize a legal issue. One need not be a doctor to recognize when a person has fever. And one need not be an engineer to recognize a bridge collapsing.

Sen. Risa Hontiveros may not be a lawyer but dismissing her argument on that basis is an attack on her credentials, not a defense of substance.

In public debate, the question is not who speaks. The question is whether what is being said is true.

If Senator Marcoleta disagreed with Senator Hontiveros, then he should answer her arguments, not her profession.

In the end, the irony was impossible to miss. Sen. Marcoleta was defeated by Sen. Sotto, a non-lawyer but knew the rules better.

That is the problem with credentialism. It confuses titles for wisdom and professions for truth.

[Acee™ @iamacq]

Imee “Fake News Peddler” Marcos.

[Teddy Casiño @teddycasino]

Let’s be factual. There IS a warrant of arrest for Bato de la Rosa. It’s from the International Criminal Court (ICC). There IS a domestic law (RA 9851) that allows local authorities to enforce the warrant and surrender Bato to the ICC. On top of that, the SC had ruled that even if the PH govt withdrew from the ICC in 2019, we remain obligated to cooperate on cases involving incidents prior to the withdrawal.

The NBI and PNP had every right to arrest Bato and the Senate was wrong in coddling him and facilitating his escape.

Ang may problema si Allan at Jonvic.

[Lynda Jumilla-Abalos @lyndajumilla]

Reminder that alan peter can lie with a straight face while quoting bibles verses on the side.

[jake ejercito @unoemilio]

strava reveal naman diyan, sen

[Acee™ @iamacq]

Angsakit sa tenga nitong si CJ Hirro.

[Acee™ @iamacq]

THE Xyriel Manabat just reclaimed her throne in 18th Rose. Fuckin husay! Kyle Echarri too did superb! No fan base, just pure talent! This is worth the watch peeps! Ihanda ang lahat ng emosyon! Watch it on Netflix, now na! #18thRose

[Karen Davila @iamkarendavila]

A poster boy for misogyny? Let us teach our boys the true meaning of this word. If left always unchallenged, we become complicit in breeding a culture that objectifies and disempowers women.

Kudos to @annecurtissmith for being the classy strong woman - wife and mother you are.

[Acee™ @iamacq]

Napaka OA nung mga nagbebenta ng ticket ng Sexbomb! Ganito ba talaga sa Pilipinas?! Tang ina yung 2700 na box premium 5500 tapos yung regular na 785, 3K? Hindi ba kayo magkabukol nyan!