@bruno_KUg@Trilla_Berry256 All he can be is an employee working for the production company! And the best he could shoot are loyalties, every time he's work is used! Entitlement is BS. Being the first employee to a company doesn't make you a co-founder!!!! IP is way beyond the "I was involved" statement.
@bruno_KUg@Trilla_Berry256 ... The character name (Tenge Tenge), production equipment, plus skits btw and because he ALWAYS gave a portion of the earnings to the artist (That could represent as Payment (salary, commission, etc) As one who owns neighboring rights, that is - they even agreed legally!
@DouglasLwangaUg This advice only applies to the middle corporate league! Only death due to full age is what "for now" we can't buy, everything other thing has a price and people exist that can pay that price over and over without exhaustion. Small small 100 billion USD can drill you through!
Anthropic just open-sourced an entire law firm.
80+ AI agents. 12 practice area plugins. 20 MCP connectors.
Free. Apache 2.0. On GitHub right now.
On May 12, 2026, Anthropic published anthropics/claude-for-legal on GitHub, an open source suite that collected 882 stars and 165 forks within its first 24 hours.
Here is what is actually inside.
The suite covers in-house commercial, privacy, corporate, employment, litigation, IP, regulatory, AI governance, law school clinics, and student learning. Each plugin includes named agents, Vendor Agreement Reviewer, DSAR Responder, Claim Chart Builder, slash commands, scheduled background agents, and MCP connectors to legal-specific systems like Ironclad, Everlaw, CourtListener, and Westlaw via Thomson Reuters CoCounsel.
These are not chatbots. They are not question-answering tools. They are production-grade workflow agents that do recurring legal work automatically, without a human initiating each task.
The renewal watcher monitors every contract in your system and flags upcoming deadlines before they expire. The docket watcher tracks court filings across every matter you are handling. The regulatory feed monitor reads new regulatory publications and surfaces the ones relevant to your practice. The diligence grid runs M&A due diligence checklists automatically across document sets.
A cold-start interview customizes each plugin to a team's playbook, learning your firm's specific conventions, matter types, jurisdictions, and preferred workflows before it touches any document.
Here is how to deploy it.
Everything is available two ways from one source: install it as a Claude Cowork or Claude Code plugin, or deploy it through the Claude Managed Agents API behind your own workflow engine. Same system prompt, same skills, you choose where it runs.
And the MCP connectors wire Claude directly into every major legal system your team already uses.
Connectors to Slack, Google Drive, Box, DocuSign, iManage, Lexis+, Everlaw, CourtListener, Harvey, Thomson Reuters, and Free Law Project all pre-built, all ready to deploy.
Now here is the context that makes this genuinely alarming for the legal tech industry.
Harvey is valued at $11 billion. Legora raised $600 million. Thomson Reuters has spent decades and billions building legal research infrastructure. Every one of these companies charges law firms and in-house teams significant per-seat, per-matter, or per-query fees for AI-assisted legal work.
Specialized outlets from LawSites to Artificial Lawyer describe the release as the first coordinated move by a model maker against vertical legaltech incumbents. TechCrunch notes that the release lines up with the integration of Claude into Microsoft 365 with native tracked changes on Word โ a capability that until now had been the exclusive territory of paid legaltech suites.
One honest thing Anthropic built into every line of this repository.
Every output from these plugins is a draft for attorney review not legal advice, not a legal conclusion, not a substitute for a lawyer. They are built with guardrails that reflect that: source attribution on every citation, conservative defaults on privilege and subjective legal calls, jurisdiction assumptions surfaced, and explicit gates before anything is filed, sent, or relied on. A lawyer reviews, verifies, and takes professional responsibility for anything that leaves the building.
The tool speeds up the lawyer. It does not replace the lawyer.
Here is who this is built for.
In-house commercial and privacy teams. Big Law and mid-size firms. Litigation practices. IP and regulatory counsel. AI governance teams. Law school clinics. Students. And notably self-represented litigants who previously had no access to any of these tools at any price.
Freshfields has already deployed Claude across thousands of users and is working with Anthropic to build AI-native legal workflows. Claude Opus 4.7 scored 90.9% on BigLaw Bench, the highest score of any Claude model.
Anthropic said: the legal sector is facing mounting pressure to adopt AI, and the firms and in-house teams that move are pulling ahead fast.
The legal tech industry spent years building walls around AI-assisted legal work and charging fortunes to get through them.
Anthropic just took the walls down.
Free. Open source. On GitHub right now.
https://t.co/OPZW6uILg7
Source: Anthropic ยท GitHub ยท TechCrunch ยท Artificial Lawyer ยท LawSites ยท Pasquale Pillitteri ยท May 12, 2026
@FELIXO999@NinyeTabz@brucenahabwe1 When it reaches home, thats where I come in to wash the money to zero stains, keep up a steady supply chain with zero bugs and spoofs
@LoudOutside I cook better than my woman 110000000% and because of that, I don't like her food yet if I had not known how to cook - she would be the master chef and queen of my kitchen no doubt