Romario Williams

🇯🇲 • 👨🏽‍💻Software & Web Developer

[Jordan Liu @jordanxliu]

@taylorotwell Here’s my entry: Voxelverse. You can build voxel scenes in your browser, save them, and share them.

https://t.co/Ny6jWeMPVT

[Jordan Liu @jordanxliu]

Jamaica, it’s time!

Jamaica Decides is back, better than ever. Follow real time election data for the 2025 General Election. Built by Jamaicans, for Jamaicans. #JaVotes2025

https://t.co/WGEJxSA8i2

[Romario Williams @iamrwkali]

@jordanxliu @shadcn @juxtopposed nicee 🔥

[Romario Williams @iamrwkali]

@tyanna_selena @sirnotlyh this could have been avoided by mentioning “paternal” or “maternal” uncle… or say that the said sister was the only sibling of the uncle

[Romario Williams @iamrwkali]

@tyanna_selena @sirnotlyh right, and what they’re missing is that we are using what the question provided.. the problem is that the question provided ambiguous information

[Romario Williams @iamrwkali]

@tas_wirl @sirnotlyh reducing this to overthinking is undermining the readers’ critical thinking abilities. it’s called critical for that very reason of analyzing, interpreting etc. also, one could say her marriage was mentioned to indicate who “Mrs” Smith is

[Romario Williams @iamrwkali]

@tas_wirl @sirnotlyh i get what you’re saying, but now we’re going off a tangent about the terminology of uncles vs uncles-in-law. going back to the original question, the information given is open to multiple inferences. two things can be right, that’s all i’m saying

[Romario Williams @iamrwkali]

@tas_wirl @sirnotlyh in day to day life yes, but in the context of this question on a exam, not necessarily. even one of the multiple choice answers has the concept of “in-law”

[Romario Williams @iamrwkali]

@NoelKaliah lol fair enough 😂

[Romario Williams @iamrwkali]

Dain and him whole family ears a ring right now 😂

[EnergizerBunny🇯🇲 @SbShariek]

I'm sorry for these kids taking PEP. Honestly, I would have gotten this wrong if I were still a child.

[Romario Williams @iamrwkali]

@NoelKaliah The point is, again, that the information given has inferences for both B and C to be correct. This is a mental ability question right, we have to use logic from the limited info given. Logically, Mrs. Smith could be either Dain’s aunt or Dain’s mother

[Romario Williams @iamrwkali]

@tas_wirl @sirnotlyh you raise a good point, but he would have an “uncle-in-law” in the scenario you’re describing

[Romario Williams @iamrwkali]

@sirnotlyh exactly lol

[Romario Williams @iamrwkali]

@sirnotlyh They didn’t state whether it’s his maternal or paternal uncle. (stating that the uncle only has one sister, doesn’t rule out the uncle having a brother which would then be Dain’s father , making the sister in question Dain’s aunt) so the answer still could be C or B

[Romario Williams @iamrwkali]

@NoelKaliah but for B we’re adding a hypothetical factor that the uncle that we’re talking about is Dain’s maternal uncle… Dain’s paternal uncle could also have only one sister. the point being we can’t rule out which side of the family the uncle is from solely from the information given

[Romario Williams @iamrwkali]

@NoelKaliah this is why the question is poorly worded. if the examiner intends for B (mother) to be the only correct answer, it should explicitly say “His uncle has only one sibling, his sister” otherwise C (aunt) remains a logically valid interpretation of the information given

[Romario Williams @iamrwkali]

@NoelKaliah you’re right that we should use only the information given, but the info given “only has one sister” still doesn’t explicitly rule out the uncle having no brothers

[Romario Williams @iamrwkali]

@sirnotlyh Not exactly, “Dain has only one uncle” doesn’t rule out the uncle having one brother, which would be Dain’s father. In this case Dain still has no other uncles

However it does rule out what I said about “any amount of brothers”. Instead I should have said up to 1 brother

[Romario Williams @iamrwkali]

@DuncanAdley @RushCam exactly! rules shouldn’t be arbitrary - they should serve a specific purpose (and no, that purpose can’t simply be to maintain discipline/“capacity to conform”). it should be that discipline stems from rational rules, not that rules are created solely to instill discipline

[Romario Williams @iamrwkali]

rules are important to bring order to society but rules should be logical for the context. maybe instead of nitpicking non-academic conformity (hair, length of dress, etc), J’can schools could focusing more on holistic discipline & things that boosts students academic performance