Salli

Data Analyst | Finding the story behind the data

[Salli @iamsallis]

Match Analysis: Real Madrid 4-1 Real Sociedad

Date 26 Aug 2026
LaLiga Season 2026/27

🔽

[Salli @iamsallis]

@mz9025908 @mmr_sa1 @AhmedEzzElDin https://t.co/o7UncNOwkh

[Salli @iamsallis]

حلقة ثرية وجميلة شكرًا لكم

@mmr_sa1
@AhmedEzzElDin

[Salli @iamsallis]

"إذا انت��ى أمرٌ من الأمورِ

وبقيَ في نفسِك حيًّا..

فما انتهى!"

[Salli @iamsallis]

@EVE4ever_ اول شهر لا تنتظر اداء قوي منه

احسن غيره ورجعه في اكتوبر

[Salli @iamsallis]

@SHROOQ_1214 على حسب حجمها، لكن لو تحتاجي شي استثمار قوي ويدوم معك افضل شي ايباد الجيل العاشر

[Salli @iamsallis]

@AmrKhaledpalest سلوت فكرة والفكرة لاتموت😂😂😂

[Salli @iamsallis]

@mostafasaad20 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[Amr @__iMory]

خلال مسيرته كاملة منذ 2010 مع الأندية، واجه ياسين بونو:
🥅 55 ركلة جزاء
🧤تصدى لـ10 منها (18%)!

🥅 20 ركلة ترجيحية
🧤 تصدى لـ5 منها (25%)!

وهنا تحليل عن جميع ركلات الجزاء التي واجهها بمسيرته
(ركلة جزاء اليوم غير مشمولة)

[Salli @iamsallis]

@costa06031902 اثق بان موينهو قادر يحققه هذا الموسم، بغض النظر عن التخبطات اللي حتحصل

[Kirolos Magdy 📊 @SaidMeaza]

-Couple of thoughts on Salinas, one of the options Utd are linked to at left-back.

-A very interesting profile, but still needs the right environment to take his time and develop properly. But would still be a decent choice as Luke Shaw backup.

Radar from: https://t.co/lkrsKCeLTe

[Salli @iamsallis]

@tactext اعتقد بعد التوقف الدولي حت��دأ تتضح الصورة، ومدى التنافسية على الدوري وحتى اللاعبين الجدد حيكونوا تأقلموا أكثر

[Salli @iamsallis]

مباراة الهلال نسخة الم��نيا:

[Salli @iamsallis]

@EVE4ever_ تشبه دكة يونايتد بعد السير

[Salli @iamsallis]

@7iAhmed7 الفكرة هافيتز مستواه مش ثابت ويتعرض للاصابة، لكن مثلك ما اعتقد ارتيتا يحتاجه

[Salli @iamsallis]

@iAbdullahYousef ماشاء الله عبدالله، الله يقويك 🤩

[Salli @iamsallis]

@OnlyBergkamp @1SMi_ لو جاكم مبروك الدوري من دحين

[Salli @iamsallis]

@__iMory صفقة رهيب، الله يتممها لكم

[TacTical @TacTical_41]

Frosinone 0–1 Juventus — the gap wasn't the scoreline, it was the last twenty metres.

Juventus won 1–0 and won the underlying match with it: 1.97 xG to 0.50, 4 big chances to 0. But the interesting number isn't the total, it's the funnel. Juve reached the final third 41 times and the box 18 — 44% of entries survived the last twenty metres. Frosinone reached the final third 19 times and the box 8. Territory wasn't the difference; both sides converted box entries into shots at nearly the same rate (Frosinone 50%, Juve 47%). The difference was how often each side got there at all.

That's a progression problem, not a finishing one. 63 progressive passes to 29, and — more telling — 14 deep completions to 4. Juve moved the ball through lines; Frosinone moved it around them. A block slides comfortably against circulation. It has to break its own shape when a pass arrives behind a line, and Frosinone only made that happen four times.

The transition data is where I'd start the review if I were on Frosinone's staff. They had MORE broken-play sequences — 46 to Juve's 34 — and took 0.12 xG from them against Juve's 0.76. They also won the ball high more often (22 high regains to 13) and counterpressed better (16.0% vs 13.8%). Every pressing board on the page favours Frosinone. Almost none of it was cashed. Regain-to-shot: Frosinone 3.8%, Juventus 9.3% from fewer regains.

That is a press paying in territory and not in threat, and the correction is one action deep. The four seconds after a regain are when the opponent is most stretched, and it's settled by the first pass — is there a runner beyond the ball, does the first receiver scan before the ball is won, is anyone holding the cut-back lane. Those are rehearsable. Winning the ball 22 times in the opponent's half is a ninety-minute physical cost, and Frosinone paid it in full for 0.12 xG.

Bremer's goal on 22 then split the match into two different games. Juventus while leading: 1.13 xG, 15 shots, 12 box entries. Frosinone while trailing: 0.38 xG, 9 shots, 6 box entries. Any full-match average here is describing two matches added together. Frosinone's possession and pressing totals rise partly out of necessity — that's chasing, not control.

Shot quality tells the same story at a finer resolution: 0.099 xG per attempt for Juve against 0.045. Frosinone's average shot was worth less than half of Juve's. A side taking low-value attempts usually isn't shooting badly, it's arriving badly — the correction sits upstream, in the pass before and the movement before that.

One caveat, and it matters. 1 goal came from 2.47 combined xG, and rest-defence vulnerability was identical at 16.7% for both sides (7 dangerous counters conceded by Frosinone, 8 by Juventus). Juve were as loose on the turnover as their opponent — they were just better at punishing it. Finishing is the noisiest thing in a match and the least likely part to repeat.

Individually: Douglas Luiz was the fulcrum — 14.51 sequence xT from 36 possessions, 1.05 xGChain, and 0.78 of that surviving as xGBuildup once the shot and the pass before it are stripped out. That's a builder, not a finisher, and goals-and-assists misses all of it. Giacomo Calò led Frosinone on 11.18 sequence xT with 3 key passes and 0 shots — the involvement was there; the structure ahead of him wasn't.

Frosinone lost this on the pass after the press, not on the press.
https://t.co/YR0i5Rhqff