Abhijit Singh

Full Stack Software Engineer @ SAP Fioneer | Digital Banking | Banking & Finance | Indian (Army, Railways, Politics, Cricket)

[Abhijit Singh @iasvns]

@deepakshenoy Higher tax right?

[Abhijit Singh @iasvns]

@DhanCares Okay. Not interested in using Dhan now with this rule. Thank you!

[Abhijit Singh @iasvns]

@DhanCares Okay, fine. When creating a new SIP why is it mandatory to start from the current day?

[Abhijit Singh @iasvns]

@JioMart_Support Further you ignored other question from DM. Why is customer care number not reachable? Is that correct?

[Abhijit Singh @iasvns]

@JioMart_Support Sent a DM with an issue. Please check.

[Abhijit Singh @iasvns]

@JioMart_Support And good that atleast it is visible to you. What is the ETA for resolution?

[Abhijit Singh @iasvns]

@JioMart_Support Not visible

[Abhijit Singh @iasvns]

@DhanCares are you guys running mock trading session? Didn't get any notification. Even if it is mock, how come the market is Live on your app and Forever orders getting executed? @DhanHQ

[Abhijit Singh @iasvns]

@CRED_club This shouldn't be required to manage a family portfolio. I understand your business case of inflating Cred user base through Kuvera. But this is completely avoidable. I will prefer to port to a different app if this is not resolved asap.

[Abhijit Singh @iasvns]

@CRED_club Thanks for the much awaited update.

[Abhijit Singh @iasvns]

@abhymurarka How about Persistent? It formed this pattern 2 days ago on the 18th

[Abhijit Singh @iasvns]

Lol @IDFCFIRSTBank social media handler team called, asked if it is the right time to talk. I agreed to talk. Don't know what he understood, disconnected the call immediately.

[Abhijit Singh @iasvns]

. @IDFCFIRSTBank should rename themselves to FraudBank.
Deducted an unexplained amount from my account, possible to recover the losses incurred by 600 Cr fraud.
Ticket raised 1143849517 - closed saying `transaction was successful`.

[Abhijit Singh @iasvns]

2026. Expect to have seamless exp switching devices. Just login and done.
@WhatsApp pls consider to save these at your backend - display name, profile bio line, mute settings for groups/status, media download preference, contacts added to list.

[Abhijit Singh @iasvns]

In December-January, North India needs flood lights in day time and you have scheduled night matches. lol.

[BCCI @BCCI]

📍 Lucknow

Geared up for the 4⃣th T20I! 👍

#TeamIndia | #INDvSA | @IDFCFIRSTBank

[Alan Smith @AlanJLSmith]

Suppose that once a week, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to £100.

If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:

The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.

The fifth would pay £1.

The sixth would pay £3.

The seventh would pay £7.

The eighth would pay £12.

The ninth would pay £18.

And the tenth man (the richest) would pay £59.　

So, that’s what they decided to do.

The ten men drank in the bar every week and seemed quite happy with the arrangement until, one day, the owner caused them a little problem.

“Since you are all such good customers,” he said, “I’m going to reduce the cost of your weekly beer by £20.”

Drinks for the ten men would now cost just £80.

The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes.

So the first four men were unaffected.

They would still drink for free but what about the other six men?

The paying customers? How could they divide the £20 windfall so that everyone would get his fair share?

They realized that £20 divided by six is £3.33, but if they subtracted that from everybody’s share then not only would the first four men still be drinking for free but the fifth and sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer.　

So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fairer to reduce each man’s bill by a higher percentage.

They decided to follow the principle of the tax system they had been using and he proceeded to work out the amounts he suggested that each should now pay.

And so, the fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (a 100% saving).

The sixth man now paid £2 instead of £3 (a 33% saving).

The seventh man now paid £5 instead of £7 (a 28% saving).

The eighth man now paid £9 instead of £12 (a 25% saving).

The ninth man now paid £14 instead of £18 (a 22% saving).

And the tenth man now paid £49 instead of £59 (a 16% saving).　

Each of the last six was better off than before with the first four continuing to drink for free.　

But, once outside the bar, the men began to compare their savings. “I only got £1 out of the £20 saving,” declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man, “but he got £10!“　

“Yeah, that’s right,” exclaimed the fifth man. “I only saved a £1 too. It’s unfair that he got ten times more benefit than me!”　

“That’s true!” shouted the seventh man. “Why should he get £10 back, when I only got £2? The wealthy get all the breaks!”　

“Wait a minute,” yelled the first four men in unison, “we didn’t get anything at all. This new tax system exploits the poor!”

The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.　

The next week the tenth man didn’t show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had their beers without him.

But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important – they didn’t have enough money between all of them to pay for even half of the bill!　

And that’s how it works.

Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy and they just might not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas, where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.　

For those who understand, no explanation is needed.

For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.

[Abhijit Singh @iasvns]

@DhanCares @hemanth_chndra The message needs to be corrected. ‘Already’ is inappropriate here. 🙂

[Abhijit Singh @iasvns]

Same with Holdings page as well.

[Abhijit Singh @iasvns]

@zerodha On Kite iOS App, can you please make the search box on watchlist sticky? It should not go out of screen on scrolling. Should always be available to search. Right now, if we have scrolled down, need to go up and then search.