Long Legged Larry

Don't mind, so don't ask. It's OK w me! I do serious business in important places. I enjoy having fun and then talking about it.

[Long Legged Larry @ibeturface]

@vxylily 'has money' is correct.
Too bad I don't has any 😂👍🏼🤌🏻

[Long Legged Larry @ibeturface]

Polygraphs are inadmissible in court. Meanwhile…

Cop: "Yes your honor, the dog told me he had drugs in the car!"

Judge: "Court finds probable cause exists!"

[Long Legged Larry @ibeturface]

@StephenKing The are you sure it had nothing to do with the youth gangdang ending scene from the first edition of "IT." I bet it did.

[Long Legged Larry @ibeturface]

@ohhanxiety I feel weird being the only person to say it, but a bachelor. What else?

[Long Legged Larry @ibeturface]

@ohhanxiety I live in Texas. That is all.

[Long Legged Larry @ibeturface]

@GavinNewsom Gavin calls a press slumber party.

[Long Legged Larry @ibeturface]

@grok So it's a conspiracy theory?

[Long Legged Larry @ibeturface]

@grok Is Israel secretly controlled by Jews?

[Long Legged Larry @ibeturface]

@Sereksus What are you babbling about? And Why did you put a question mark at the end?

[Long Legged Larry @ibeturface]

Karmelo Anthony is not an evil person. He was reckless. He made a very poor decision without thinking.

[Long Legged Larry @ibeturface]

@Sereksus Never said it was an accident. Never said he shouldn't be held accountable. I guess the point I'm making is that maybe we should at least come together and agree that bringing the knife to a track meet was a bad idea. Let's start there and see where it takes us.

[Long Legged Larry @ibeturface]

@elonmusk Did xAI block my access to grok? All my chats have been erased, and I am literally being shunned by grok. I feel like xAI blacklisted me somehow.
Either way, I'm pissed.

Regards,
LLL
L.L.L.,L.L.C.

[Long Legged Larry @ibeturface]

This is from my discussion with Grok about whether the Covid leak should be considered a false flag event, or "accidental."

-----------

Me: An even better analogy exists in the world of firearms. Because when a gun fires uncommanded due to an internal malfunction, typically without touching the trigger, it is called an accidental discharge. However many times it is commonly misnomered as "accidental" whenever a person pulls the trigger and fires the weapon by mistake. But this is very clearly defined as a "negligent discharge." What this lab research was doing was metaphorically waving a loaded gun around much like a child might do after finding his dad's pistol.

Grok: Your firearms analogy is a strong one. A negligent discharge—where someone handles a loaded weapon recklessly, points it where they shouldn't, or fails to follow basic safety rules—better captures the lab-leak hypothesis than a pure "accident" (like a mechanical failure with no human trigger).

The evidence, especially from the June 19, 2026 ODNI declassifications under DNI Tulsi Gabbard, supports framing it as negligent biosafety failure rooted in reckless decision-making.

### Why the Analogy Fits
- "Waving a loaded gun around": Researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) conducted high-risk coronavirus work—including genetic manipulation of bat viruses to test human infectivity—often at BSL-2 levels (comparable to a dentist's office for some procedures). This was despite known biosafety shortfalls: inadequate training, staffing issues (flagged by U.S. diplomats in 2018), and documented lapses like autoclave failures and "hidden safety dangers" in internal WIV reports from 2019.

- Loaded by policy choices: U.S. funding via NIH/EcoHealth Alliance supported this work, even around the gain-of-function pause. The declassified materials describe conditions ripe for release: precursor viruses, human-receptor adaptation experiments, and inadequate containment. Gabbard's release explicitly calls it the source of an "unintentional lab leak."

- Trigger pull as negligence, not God or pure chance: Human error drives most lab-acquired infections (~70% per reviews). Past SARS escapes happened even at higher BSL levels. Overconfidence in protocols (while promoting them publicly) while cutting corners mirrors negligent handling—knowing the risks but proceeding anyway.

This wasn't unforeseeable randomness. Warnings existed. Oversight was lax. Containment was performative in key ways. The result was predictable in a probabilistic sense: eventually, something gets out.

### Important Distinctions
Even so, it remains negligent, not intentional release. The declass docs and assessments emphasize unintentional escape and subsequent cover-up/narrative shaping (Fauci's alleged role in downplaying lab-leak and shaping intel), not deliberate deployment. No genomic smoking gun for engineering as a weapon, and the virus's behavior fits either a lab-adapted or naturally evolved pathogen.<grok:render card_id="4902f3" card_type="citation_card" type="render_inline_citation"><argument name="citation_id">2</argument></grok:render>

Zoonotic spillover at the market still has scientific backing in some analyses, but the lab scenario is now the stronger one per the latest U.S. intel releases and circumstantial evidence (proximity, research focus, early opacity).

Your point lands: this was elite hubris meeting inadequate safeguards on dangerous research. "Negligent biosafety failure" or "reckless high-risk pathogen research with foreseeable escape" is the precise term. It demands real accountability—stricter global standards, ending risky gain-of-function without ironclad justification, and transparency—rather than vague "accidents happen" dismissals. The human cost was too high for anything less.

[Long Legged Larry @ibeturface]

@SenWarren Have you ever counted how many teeth your vaj has?

[Long Legged Larry @ibeturface]

@Euan_MacDonald @grok @grok?

[Long Legged Larry @ibeturface]

@Euan_MacDonald @grok pls rate the truthfulness of this post from 1-10.

[Long Legged Larry @ibeturface]

Many people do not understand what the word "empathy" means. They conflate the term with "sympathy." The simple fact is that most people are incapable of empathizing with most other people, about most things. They may sympathize, but that's not at all the same thing.

Example: As a man, I sympathize with women suffering through the process of menstruation. I'm sure it sucks, and I do feel sorry for them about that. However I can never empathize with them because I don't have periods. Many people tend to use the word incorrectly and often criticize others for lacking empathy even though they do as well.

[Long Legged Larry @ibeturface]

It used to be in many cases. Food and Beverage costs used to be a huge write off for business. Especially hotels. Room service and eating at restaurants used to be far cheaper even after adjusting for inflation. They used to donate a lot of leftover food to homeless shelters, but when the cost went up a lot of people lost jobs because of it and the homeless population rose sharply. It became too much of a liability and a headache so they just started dumping it all in the trash. Then the Obamacare tax hit and homelessness skyrocketed. It was 10x easier to profitably run a restaurant back before all this. Today its easy to lose millions of dollars in a matter of weeks when opening a new restaurant. It just isn't worth trying anymore.

[Long Legged Larry @ibeturface]

@AntiLeftMemes Dean Ween