18 mois de sursis (donc rien du tout) pour des agressions sexuelles répétées commises sur des enfants.
Une civilisation qui ne protège pas ses enfants n’a pas d’avenir. La France est un pays profondément décadent sur cet aspect. La justice n’a rien d’éclairée ni d’équitable.
La fascination de certains européens pour un pays aussi naze que les US je ne comprendrai jamais.
Tu vis en Europe, un continent millénaire avec une variété de climats, plats, cultures, langues mais tu vas t’émerveiller devant un pays aussi fade. Ça me dépasse.
I read this and couldn’t help thinking that this is far deeper than it sounds. Even I often say, “Jesus saved me,” without fully grasping the depth of what that truly means.
As a young Uni debater, I fell in love with a concept called the Prisoner’s Dilemma. Here’s the setup: Two prisoners are interrogated separately. If both stay silent, they get light sentences. If one betrays, the betrayer goes free while the other gets maximum time. If both betray, both get heavy sentences.
The rational move? Betray first. Don’t risk being the one left holding the bag. Protect yourself before trusting the other.
This logic runs everywhere, relationships, business, politics. The question is always: Who moves first? Who takes the risk? Who trusts without guarantee?
Normal human calculus says: “I’ll give if they give. I’ll trust if they prove trustworthy. I’ll sacrifice if I know it won’t be wasted.” We always want leverage. Assurance before vulnerability.
Then there’s Jesus Christ.
The Bible says He is “the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world” (Revelation 13:8). Before creation. Before sin. Before humanity had a chance to reject or accept Him, the decision was made.
Think about that. God looked at the entire scope of human history, knowing we all have free will, knowing many would reject Him, knowing the cost, and still chose the Cross.
Christ was going to die anyway. Even if everyone rejected Him. Even if no one accepted. That was the risk He took. He didn’t wait. He didn’t hedge. He didn’t demand proof of loyalty.
He just died.
Normal human logic asks: “What if I die and they don’t accept it? Shouldn’t they prove themselves first?” Christ didn’t care for leverage. He moved first. Unconditionally and irrevocably.
He broke the dilemma.
That’s scandalous, at least in my eyes. Because the logic of self-preservation, the logic that governs how we negotiate, trust, and love, assumes vulnerability must be calculated. Christ obliterated that assumption. He gave first. Loved first. Died first.
Now the question isn’t, “Will God love me if I get it right?” The real question imo is: What do you do with a God who already went all in?
Gabriel Jesus gets it: “Jesus saved my life from the beginning, when I was born, I didn’t know it yet.”
Grace isn’t reactive. It isn’t conditional. It arrives before your awareness, before your response, before your yes.
That’s the scandal: He moved first, and He didn’t flinch.
Alisson Becker: "I am a man of faith. But a lot of people do not know that it was not always this way. Real faith came to me later in life. As I got older, and I experienced more of life — both joy and pain, I realised that God is closer than you can ever imagine."
🚨FLASH I "Ils vont détruire l’Église avec ça": l’église Saint-Roch à Paris transformée en scène de louange identitaire
🔴⚡️« Ils vont détruire l’Église avec ça » cette phrase du @Card_R_Sarah prend tout son sens quand dans ce genre de manifestation, l’église devient une scène de spectacle et de revendication identitaire
#CitéCéleste @Eglisecatho@dioceseparis
extrait images KTO
Sauf que les 10 % les plus riches qui paient trois quarts de l’impôt sur le revenu ne touchent pas 75 % des revenus mais seulement 34 %. Les 5 % les plus riches paient 59 % mais ne touchent que 24 % des revenus. Concentration qui se poursuit à une maille encore plus fine, puisque les 1 % les plus riches règlent 33 % de l’IR alors que leurs revenus ne représentent que 11 % du total. La question n’est pas de les plaindre, mais de présenter les faits de façon exacte, et de préférer l’analyse lucide à la fantasmagorie.