@mjovanovictech it should be a compiler warning, but the compilers don’t warn about bad variable naming 😂…. JK! JK!!!!
twitter-drive-by-ad-hoc-code-review: maybe rename `incrementBy` to `accumulator` to better describe its intent?
@o_osetianov@mjovanovictech historically, if you look at how a critical section works, the entering thread id is stored, so te-entrancy can be handled properly. For async, that’s not as easy, as the thread id can’t be guaranteed. I’d bet that’s why traditional lock() isn’t supported out of the box for await
@davidfowl I know everyone loves azure, but for the ones that are on AWS, is it possible to have a dev to prod walkthrough of creating and deploying?
We don’t have the fancy “az” tools you have 😂
@Missfancypantz Ja!!!!
En modern, lite mer scary version heter From… finns ~~ 3 säsonger..
Men Lost är helt klart värt det.. finns nog en lista på avsnitt som man kan se och vad man kan hoppa över 🥳🙏
@dotPavlov@davidfowl Maybe that’s the future? First unions, just as we had Tuple<T1,T2> and (T1,T2) syntax.. then maybe such generics defenitions can be valid in the future.. I’d look at Unions as part of the infrastructure. Remember, C# isn’t the only language on the runtime..