vishy 🇮🇳

When it comes to analysing news, understanding the context and putting it in the right perspective is key. Calling out agendas and recognising BS is crucial

[Kreately.in @KreatelyMedia]

दीदी तो

Full form mein hai

😎

[Eminent Intellectual @total_woke_]

Manmohan Singh deliberately made sure all semiconductor manufacturing went to China & Vietnam.

[Rishi Bagree @rishibagree]

Political Pitch parties making :

BJP - Our leaders can build Roads, trains, solar, metro, smash Pakistan, eliminate Naxals and Terrorism

Congress : Our leader can Kiss and hug

[BRADDY @braddy_Codie05]

Children in Gaza are Dying of Hunger and look at this woman.

[Anupriya Singh @cricketwoman]

I vote for politicians. For Kissing, holding hands or hugging publicly, I’ve a husband!

[Rishi Bagree @rishibagree]

Isn't she the Congress lawyer who accompanied Rahul Gandhi to the Parliament Street Police Station and is now bailing out a terror suspect who is accused of terror funding???

[Amit Malviya @amitmalviya]

Hathras is no stranger to Rahul Gandhi. He has travelled there repeatedly in the past, turning an extremely tragic incident into a political campaign and using it to deepen caste divisions among Hindus.

Now, a 70-year-old man, Nizamuddin, has been accused of raping and impregnating his minor granddaughter in Hathras.

Rahul Gandhi has recently appointed himself the ambassador of “Smash the Patriarchy.” So, will he head to Hathras now?

No, he won’t.

Because when Rahul Gandhi talks about patriarchy, it appears to be less about standing with victims and more about political posturing, selectively deployed when it suits his narrative.

If Smash the Patriarchy is genuinely a principle, it cannot come with a political filter.

A victim is a victim. A crime is a crime. And justice cannot depend on the community of the accused.

[Trains of India 🇮🇳 @trainwalebhaiya]

Ahh, I hate these people so much. They did so little to connect the Northeast when they were in power, wasted an entire decade looting the country, and now they're crying foul when someone is actually working.

Dear @INCIndia I challenge you to prove me wrong. I'll attach official proofs for each and every statement I've made, and I expect you to counter them with the same.

The Dimapur (Dhansiri)–Kohima (Zubza) railway line was officially proposed in 2004 and approved in 2006–07 at an initial estimated cost of ₹850 crore.

Now here comes the twist: for the next 8 years, ZERO work was done on the project. Yes, you heard that right, 0 land acquisition, 0 construction. (Proofs attached.)

Later, in 2015, the project plan was revised, with the estimated cost rising to ₹2,300 crore due to the delay. Land acquisition started in 2015, and construction finally began in 2016. (Proofs attached.)

Fun fact: nearly ₹500 crore has been paid as compensation for land acquisition, while people sitting at Congress HQ apparently want the entire line to be built with the ₹850Cr budget approved back in 2006.

As of today, physical progress is around 50%, and the entire line is expected to be completed by 2029.

If you ask me, is there a delay? Yes, there is, even if we compare it with the revised timeline from around 2015.

Is there cost escalation? Yes, there is, largely due to the delays and other project-related factors like tough terrain.

But my point is simple: delay and cost escalation are still better when there is actual physical progress than when there is ZERO progress at all.

You can't spend years doing nothing and then suddenly cry foul when someone else finally starts building :)

[Anupam K. Singh @AnupamNawada]

No sir, you are completely wrong here.

This is precisely how civilisations surrender their intellectual inheritance: first you are told a text is irrelevant, then that defending it is regressive, and finally that the respectable thing to do is quietly abandon it.

Today it is Manusmriti. Tomorrow someone will drag a few verses out of the Ramcharitmanas and tell us Tulsidas has accumulated too much historical baggage to be defended. The day after that, someone will cherry-pick passages from the Vedas and demand that we distance ourselves from them as well.

Where exactly does this logic stop?

The Corpus Juris Civilis, compiled under Emperor Justinian I in the sixth century, belongs to a world radically different from modern Europe. Nobody argues that every provision in it should govern twenty-first-century society. Yet Roman law remains an object of serious study across universities because it is part of the intellectual ancestry of modern legal systems.

Civilised societies do not preserve old texts because they agree with every sentence in them. They preserve them because they refuse to become historical orphans.

I am not arguing that every injunction in Manusmriti must become law today. I am arguing against this astonishing proposition that once political activists have successfully demonised an ancient Indian work, Hindus themselves should concede the battlefield and announce: “Fine, this book is irrelevant anyway.”

Absolutely not.

Our Manishis produced an enormous civilisational corpus. Vedas, Upanishads, Dharmashastras, Itihasas, Puranas, philosophical schools, commentaries and countless other works. They should be read, preserved, debated, contextualised, criticised where necessary, and defended against dishonest caricature.

We cannot allow our relationship with our own intellectual heritage to be dictated by whoever shouts the loudest against it.

If its popular image has been constructed through selective quotations, polemics, mistranslations or political campaigns, then challenging that image is exactly what scholarship is supposed to do. History is not a public-relations verdict that becomes permanently binding once enough activists repeat it.

A civilisation that becomes embarrassed by its books every time someone attacks them will eventually be left with no books worth defending and no civilisation worth inheriting.

[Dr. Sudhanshu Trivedi @SudhanshuTrived]

मैं राजनीतिक और मनुस्मृति, दोनों की बात बताता हूं। राहुल गांधी सरासर झूठ बोलते हैं। हकीकत ये है। ये ‘Dismantling Global Hindutva’ के प्रोजेक्ट पर काम कर रहे हैं।
मैं पूछना चाहता हूं राहुल गांधी से ये पितृसत्तात्मक संस्कृति जैसा संस्कृतनिष्ठ शब्द कहाँ से आया ?

पर कभी मर्दुम अजीम रवायत सुनी है?
चार बीवी क्या है ?
तलाक का अधिकार सिर्फ पुरुष को। चुप।
हलाला से महिला पवित्र हो जाती है। चुप।

मेहरम पता है क्या होता है? हमारी सरकार आने से पहले मेहरम वो होता था कि इस्लामी मान्यता के अनुसार घर से बाहर अगर महिला निकले तो किसी पुरुष की छत्रछाया में होना चाहिए। मेहरम हमने खत्म किया। मेहरम चुप।

इस व्यक्ति की हकीकत देखो। जो कहता है हिजाब होना बहुत अच्छा है, मगर हिंदू धर्म में महिलाओं को समानता नहीं है। मैं चैलेंज करके कहता हूं, दुनिया में जितने भी धर्म और मजहब हैं, उनमें भगवान सबको कुछ न कुछ इंट्यूशन देते हैं, भगवान की कृपा होती है। ये पुरुष पर ही क्यों होती है, महिला पर क्यों नहीं?

सिर्फ भारतीय संस्कृति ऐसी है, जहां वेदों में 22 ऋषिकाएं हैं अपाला, लोपामुद्रा, मैत्रेयी, संध्या।

फैक्ट:
मनु स्मृति पर महात्मा गांधी, नेहरू, डा। अंबेडकर ने क्या कहा और इंदिरा गांधी जी के जमाने में क्या छपा।

ये आदमी अपने पिता को, दादी को, नेहरू को, गांधी जी को गलत साबित करने में लगा है।

ये लोग समाज के अंदर भारत के विरुध्द वैश्विक षड्यंत्र ‘Dismantling Global Hindutva’, जो 2021 में अमेरिकन यूनिवर्सिटी में बना था, इसके बाद जब इन्होंने कास्ट पर लड़ाने का विषय शुरू किया, हेनरी लूसी फाउंडेशन, मार्च 2021, फिर उसके बाद 2022!से तमिलनाडु में कॉन्फ्रेंस शुरू हुई ‘Eradication of Sanatan Dharma’।

अब महिलाओं की बात आई है। अगर 4 करोड़ आवास मिले हैं प्रधानमंत्री जी के कार्यकाल में तो 3 करोड़ गरीब महिलाएं उसमें खुद मालिक बनकर बैठी हैं। 55 करोड़ जनधन अकाउंट में 60% महिलाएं हैं। ड्रोन दीदी, लखपति दीदी, कैबिनेट मंत्रिमंडल में महिलाएं और एयरफोर्स व डिफेंस सर्विसेज में परमानेंट कमीशन मिला है तो हमारे जमाने में मिला है।

आज तक जवाब दे दें। मैं चैलेंज करके कहता हूं राहुल गांधी कहो गांधी गलत थे, नेहरू गलत थे, डा अंबेडकर गलत थे, मेरी दादी गलत थी, सब गलत बोल रहे थे। मेरा आविर्भाव हुआ है अपने पूर्वजों व परिवार की बेइज़्ज़ती करे व भारत में अराजकता उत्पन्न करने के लिए।

[Āryā_Anvikṣā 🪷 @Arya_Anviksha_]

The Left knows exactly what it is doing, strategically weaponising selective quotes from the Manusmriti to push the Right into a defensive, apologetic posture. And the Right often falls into the trap rushing to declare, “We don’t keep the Manusmriti,” “Hindus don’t read it,” or “We don’t follow it,” as if disowning a text will silence the criticism. It won’t.

The moment you disown the Smritis, the goalposts simply move from the Manusmriti to the Ramcharitmanas, from the Ramcharitmanas to the Ramayana, then to the Mahabharata, and from one scripture to another. There will always be another text, another verse, another selective quotation.

[Ashwini Vaishnaw @AshwiniVaishnaw]

Hope you have filed a complaint on cybercrime portal. That'll help law enforcement agencies investigate the matter further.

Also, for your information, we have identified and blocked more than 7 Cr fraudulent/inactive mobile numbers under the Sanchar Saathi initiative.

We need stronger laws and better due diligence by platforms to prevent such fraud. I urge you to create awareness among your audience.

[Office Of Vijay Patel @VijayGajeraO]

Ok. Check the date!

Meet CJP spokesperson Vaishnavi Gaur, who has removed her entire digital footprint!

To hide what?

Picture Abhi Baki Hai!

[Yogi Adityanath @myogiadityanath]

राहुल जी, आप मनु, प्रभु श्री राम और भारत की विरासत पर टिप्पणी करते हैं।

मनु को जानना है तो अथर्ववेद, शतपथ ब्राह्मण और मत्स्य पुराण पढ़िए...

[iMac_too @iMac_too]

"राहुल जी, आप यूपी के बाहर जाते हो तो यूपी को अपमानित और लांछित करते हो " - #YogiRoxx in Rae Bareli

[Devendra Fadnavis @Dev_Fadnavis]

Dear P. Chidambaram ji,
I also wish to acquire the art of having selective memory.
You know well that the 106th Constitution Amendment Act, 2023 — the Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam that you read and voted for, contains clear precondition. Under the provisions for reservation of seats for women ‘shall come into effect only after Delimitation exercise has been conducted, which will happen based on the first census taken after the Act's commencement.’
We all know the census was delayed due to COVID. Waiting for the post-commencement census and the subsequent delimitation exercise means the reservation cannot take effect in time for the 2029 general elections.
That is precisely why, in 2026, the government brought fresh legislation Bills to enable delimitation on the basis of the already-published 2011 Census figures, expand the Lok Sabha strength, and operationalise the women’s reservation in time for the 2029 elections. Your leader Rahul Gandhi and the Congress opposed and ensured the defeat of that effort in Parliament — thereby blocking the path to implementation of women’s reservation by 2029.
In 2023 you supported the 106th Amendment because you knew the NDA had the numbers and it would pass with or without your support —
“तो बहती गंगा में हाथ धो लो.” 
The moment the real opportunity for early implementation arose, the true colours of the Congress became evident.
I once again reiterate: Our leader, Hon PM @narendramodi ji, will not leave any stone unturned to implement the women’s reservation in the Parliament elections of 2029 itself.
फिर कहता हूँ इधर उधर की बात ना करो,
यह बताओ हमारी माता-बहनों का हक क्यों छीना?

[Himanta Biswa Sarma @himantabiswa]

Rahul Gandhi is NO champion of women’s rights. He is simply a Hindu baiter, using the cause of women’s empowerment as a convenient smokescreen to target and discredit Hindu Dharma.

Consider this: how many times has he spoken with the same outrage against patriarchal and medieval practices that persist under Sharia ? NEVER.

While Sharia is foundational to Islamic jurisprudence, Manusmriti has no comparable scriptural authority in Hindu Dharma. It is not even a universally binding code for Hindus.

Yet ask yourself: how many times does Rahul Gandhi attack the Manusmriti, and how many times does he attack Sharia with the same fervour?

The enduring strength of Hinduism lies in its unique ability to evolve, reform and adapt with time- as it has for millennia, and as it will for eternity.

Every Hindu must therefore ask: what is Rahul Gandhi’s real intent- championing women’s rights, or using them as a pretext to malign Hindu Dharma?

Cong rhetoric on women’s rights rings hollow when measured against its own record.

They betrayed our mothers and sisters by reversing the effect of the Shah Bano judgment.

It opposed the law against Triple Talaq. And just to cling to power in Karnataka, Rahul Gandhi ensured that not a single woman found a place in the State Cabinet.

So here is a simple challenge to Rahul Gandhi:

If women’s equality truly comes before politics, will he unequivocally support a Uniform Civil Code that guarantees equal rights irrespective of religion?

Or will his idea of “women’s rights” continue to begin and end with attacking Hinduism?

[Shehzad Jai Hind @Shehzad_Ind]

Smash it at home first Beta Rahul.

[purusha @purusa0x6c]

1.Arjuna defeated Karna during Virata yudh.
2.Arjuna defeated Karna during Kurukshetra Yudh by breaking his Bow.
3.Abhimanyu defeated Karna by breaking his chakravyuh.
4.Bhima defeated Karna during many encounters especially when he was killing kauravas and karna was unable to save them
5.Satyaki defeated Karna.
6.the Gandharva King Citraratha defeated Karna and Duryodhana along with his army. Later, Arjuna came and defeated Citraratha and saved Duryodhana.

Yeh le defeats.

[Megh Updates 🚨™ @MeghUpdates]

🚨 BIG STATEMENT

Indian badminton ace Saina Nehwal on joining BJP: “I am with the BJP now because I really APPRECIATE what they are doing for the COUNTRY and DEVELOPMENT.”