This is truly an extremely absurd and reckless accusation and attempt to shift responsibility. All the risks discussed here stem from the commercialization of large models. Whether it’s Sonnet or Opus, or the recently panic-inducing Mythos (which possesses extremely strong automated vulnerability discovery and offensive cyber-attack capabilities), they are all money-making tools under Anthropic. Relying on these tools, Anthropic has already generated hundreds of billions of dollars in revenue, secured a $965 billion financing valuation, and is pushing toward a $2 trillion IPO valuation. Does it really have no responsibility or ability to control and regulate how users of its models use them in a safe manner, and to ensure that the models do not output dangerous, harmful content and behaviors?
As the biggest beneficiary, instead of taking measures and finding ways to address the risk issues, it goes around exaggerating the risks of the models to scare the public, shifting the responsibility for risks onto customers and the government, lobbying the government to suppress competitors in the name of regulation, and dreaming of eliminating all other companies to become the world’s only private enterprise. I believe that such a company and such people will ultimately have to pay the price for everything they have done.
This is truly an extremely absurd and reckless accusation and attempt to shift responsibility. All the risks discussed here stem from the commercialization of large models. Whether it’s Sonnet or Opus, or the recently panic-inducing Mythos (which possesses extremely strong automated vulnerability discovery and offensive cyber-attack capabilities), they are all money-making tools under Anthropic. Relying on these tools, Anthropic has already generated hundreds of billions of dollars in revenue, secured a $965 billion financing valuation, and is pushing toward a $2 trillion IPO valuation. Does it really have no responsibility or ability to control and regulate how users of its models use them in a safe manner, and to ensure that the models do not output dangerous, harmful content and behaviors?
As the biggest beneficiary, instead of taking measures and finding ways to address the risk issues, it goes around exaggerating the risks of the models to scare the public, shifting the responsibility for risks onto customers and the government, lobbying the government to suppress competitors in the name of regulation, and dreaming of eliminating all other companies to become the world’s only private enterprise. I believe that such a company and such people will ultimately have to pay the price for everything they have done.
This is truly an extremely absurd and reckless accusation and attempt to shift responsibility. All the risks discussed here stem from the commercialization of large models. Whether it’s Sonnet or Opus, or the recently panic-inducing Mythos (which possesses extremely strong automated vulnerability discovery and offensive cyber-attack capabilities), they are all money-making tools under Anthropic. Relying on these tools, Anthropic has already generated hundreds of billions of dollars in revenue, secured a $965 billion financing valuation, and is pushing toward a $2 trillion IPO valuation. Does it really have no responsibility or ability to control and regulate how users of its models use them in a safe manner, and to ensure that the models do not output dangerous, harmful content and behaviors?
As the biggest beneficiary, instead of taking measures and finding ways to address the risk issues, it goes around exaggerating the risks of the models to scare the public, shifting the responsibility for risks onto customers and the government, lobbying the government to suppress competitors in the name of regulation, and dreaming of eliminating all other companies to become the world’s only private enterprise. I believe that such a company and such people will ultimately have to pay the price for everything they have done.
This is truly an extremely absurd and reckless accusation and attempt to shift responsibility. All the risks discussed here stem from the commercialization of large models. Whether it’s Sonnet or Opus, or the recently panic-inducing Mythos (which possesses extremely strong automated vulnerability discovery and offensive cyber-attack capabilities), they are all money-making tools under Anthropic. Relying on these tools, Anthropic has already generated hundreds of billions of dollars in revenue, secured a $965 billion financing valuation, and is pushing toward a $2 trillion IPO valuation. Does it really have no responsibility or ability to control and regulate how users of its models use them in a safe manner, and to ensure that the models do not output dangerous, harmful content and behaviors?
As the biggest beneficiary, instead of taking measures and finding ways to address the risk issues, it goes around exaggerating the risks of the models to scare the public, shifting the responsibility for risks onto customers and the government, lobbying the government to suppress competitors in the name of regulation, and dreaming of eliminating all other companies to become the world’s only private enterprise. I believe that such a company and such people will ultimately have to pay the price for everything they have done.
This is truly an extremely absurd and reckless accusation and attempt to shift responsibility. All the risks discussed here stem from the commercialization of large models. Whether it’s Sonnet or Opus, or the recently panic-inducing Mythos (which possesses extremely strong automated vulnerability discovery and offensive cyber-attack capabilities), they are all money-making tools under Anthropic. Relying on these tools, Anthropic has already generated hundreds of billions of dollars in revenue, secured a $965 billion financing valuation, and is pushing toward a $2 trillion IPO valuation. Does it really have no responsibility or ability to control and regulate how users of its models use them in a safe manner, and to ensure that the models do not output dangerous, harmful content and behaviors?
As the biggest beneficiary, instead of taking measures and finding ways to address the risk issues, it goes around exaggerating the risks of the models to scare the public, shifting the responsibility for risks onto customers and the government, lobbying the government to suppress competitors in the name of regulation, and dreaming of eliminating all other companies to become the world’s only private enterprise. I believe that such a company and such people will ultimately have to pay the price for everything they have done.