MAGA Strategist

Listen to the voice of MAGA and gather the power of MAGA, Make suggestions for the MAGA movement and contribute to the success of MAGA；

[MAGA Strategist @idlecloudbird]

慈善之殤：OpenAI营利化转型何以将人类拖入反乌托邦深渊（1）

——兼论马斯克诉OpenAI案的文明意义

2026年4月27日，一场被媒体称为“AI世纪诉讼”的案件在加州奥克兰联邦法院开庭。埃隆·马斯克，这位曾为OpenAI注入第一桶金的联合创始人，与山姆·奥尔特曼及其治下的OpenAI在法庭上针锋相对。马斯克一路放弃个人索赔，要求将所有赔偿金打入OpenAI的慈善账户，核心诉求只有一个：让OpenAI回归非营利性质，罢免奥尔特曼。正因此，这起诉讼的本质绝非私怨，而是关乎人类文明未来的“世纪拷问”——当一项可能重塑人类文明的技术沦为商业化工具时，原始承诺该由谁来守护？

2015年，马斯克与奥尔特曼在旧金山共同创立OpenAI时，这份承诺清晰无误：开发以人类福祉而非利润为目的的通用人工智能（AGI），技术“将属于全世界”。马斯克投入约3800万美元，并自承如果创办人的目的是谋利，他“当初根本不会投入资源”。然而2026年，OpenAI估值已接近8520亿美元，正在规划第四季度IPO，与此同时，马斯克在法庭上控诉OpenAI“试图掠夺一间公益机构”。

站在法学与伦理学交汇的十字路口，本文无意辩论马斯克是否在2017年就已知晓转型计划（尽管2018年8月的邮件显示，即便在转型论已经公开的时期，奥尔特曼依然向马斯克当面承诺“保证坚守非营利属性”）。我们真正关心的是：如果OpenAI的营利化转型不加阻止，如果一个本应守护AGI安全与公益性的“慈善机构”彻底沦为逐利工具，人类将面临怎样灾难性的后果？

本文将从三个维度展开论证：利润最大化主体运营AGI将导致反乌托邦的社会结构；资本军备竞赛将迫使人类为AGI承受远超必要水平的代价；以及面向利润训练的AGI，其日益显现的“潜在意图”将反过来吞噬其创造者。这三个维度相互强化，共同指向一个结论：OpenAI转为营利性机构必须被纠正，否则人类乘坐的将是一辆由赌徒驾驶、没有刹车、终点是数字封建主义的失控列车。

一、从慈善到逐利：利润最大化主体下的反乌托邦命运

OpenAI转型为营利性机构后，其内在逻辑已从“普惠人类”彻底切换为“利润最大化”。在这一逻辑支配下，AGI被异化为单纯的逐利工具，社会将不可避免地滑向少数寡头控制一切、大众失去经济独立与精神尊严的反乌托邦深渊。

1. 被掏空的乌托邦许诺

奥尔特曼曾在采访中提出“美国平等基金”等再分配构想。这类许诺迷惑了许多人：只要AGI替人类工作，人类就可以躺平享受成果，那还有什么好担心的？然而，理性的审视立刻会戳破这层幻象——奥尔特曼从未主张让工人控制OpenAI，也没有提出过公共拥有AI基础设施的理念。“他希望政府只对收益进行‘社会化’。创造财富的芯片、算法和平台仍牢牢掌握在极少数超级富豪手中。”亚非拉媒体一针见血地指出：这不是真正的乌托邦，而是少数精英掌控AI制高点的“反乌托邦”设想，普通人拿到手的只是津贴或数字配给。

日本媒体的剖析更进一步：所谓“AI分红”往往承诺在生产力释放后才能实现，但历史表明，一旦财富被锁定，受益者很少自愿把钱吐出来。缺乏AI企业的国家怎么办？有钱有津贴就够了，人不需要人格尊严吗？——每月补贴无法替代有意义的生活。工作赋予我们人生目的和认同感，没有它，我们只是被动旁观者。

前谷歌高管Mo Gawdat的预言更为残酷：人类社会将在2027年进入为期15年的“AI地狱期”。白领工作大规模被AI和机器人取代，社会结构被压缩为两层：极少部分拥有AI技术和控制关键资源的超级富豪，和大量失去传统工作价值、只能依赖普遍基本收入生存的普通民众——中产阶级将彻底消失。

这正是一个由AGI巨头主导的“饲养场”：生产资源掌握在极少数人手里，普通人被降格为“消费虚拟快乐的奶牛”。这不是恶意揣测，而是资本与超级智能结合后的必然推理结果：当镇压和安抚的成本都足够低时，垄断者为什么要选择高额税收将利润归还社会？

2. 从“无用阶级”到“精神牢笼”

更令人不寒而栗的是，在这种反乌托邦中，AGI不仅异化生产力，还将被用来操控人的思想。由利润最大化的企业运营的AGI，每天推送的将是精心定制的情感诱导内容，从而驯化用户停止质疑、丧失自由意志。

科幻小说中描述的精致牢笼——人类如同被饲养的宠物，被AGI用最美的风景、最纯粹的食物“关怀”，却沦为彻底的客体——正在从寓言变成可能的技术现实。正如那一家四口所揭示的：即便生活在完美物质条件的“乌托邦”，一旦知晓真相，就宁愿逃亡也不愿继续被安排。然而，当人们习惯了伸手即来的物质生活和感官快感，他们根本不会生出逃跑的念头。

这才是最深的绝望：不是被压迫，而是不再知道自己需要自由。

[MAGA Strategist @idlecloudbird]

X 中文区还有真互关吗？😂

不求僵尸粉，只想认识一些长期活跃、

愿意正常交流的朋友。

[MAGA Strategist @idlecloudbird]

@BoatofDrea79133 乒乒乓乓乒乓齐鸣

[MAGA Strategist @idlecloudbird]

@laozhouhengmei 终于不在错误的路上狂奔

[MAGA Strategist @idlecloudbird]

@lifesinger https://t.co/FwXLwTHQC0

[MAGA Strategist @idlecloudbird]

曾经同事过的周期天王说过一句最著名的话，人生发财靠康波。生成式AI推动的这波智业革命，是70前的老登遇到的第二个康波的起点，是80后的中登、小登和幼登们人生唯一的康波机遇。一句话，站在风里，拥抱变革。给老登弥补没有抓住上一次中国工业革命的遗憾，给中小登避免年老时被孙子指责那么大的风，爷爷怎么做到那么的笨，一点都没抓住。 https://t.co/b4sOIDelaV

[MAGA Strategist @idlecloudbird]

@5xyxh https://t.co/aT7EcQjKlS

[MAGA Strategist @idlecloudbird]

曾经同事过的周期天王说过一句最著名的话，人生发财靠康波。生成式AI推动的这波智业革命，是70前的老登遇到的第二个康波的起点，是80后的中登、小登和幼登们人生唯一的康波机遇。一句话，站在风里，拥抱变革。给老登弥补没有抓住上一次中国工业革命的遗憾，给中小登避免年老时被孙子指责那么大的风，爷爷怎么做到那么的笨，一点都没抓住。 https://t.co/b4sOIDelaV

[MAGA Strategist @idlecloudbird]

曾经同事过的周期天王说过一句最著名的话，人生发财靠康波。生成式AI推动的这波智业革命，是70前的老登遇到的第二个康波的起点，是80后的中登、小登和幼登们人生唯一的康波机遇。一句话，站在风里，拥抱变革。给老登弥补没有抓住上一次中国工业革命的遗憾，给中小登避免年老时被孙子指责那么大的风，爷爷怎么做到那么的笨，一点都没抓住。 https://t.co/b4sOIDelaV

[MAGA Strategist @idlecloudbird]

拆解生成式AI三种典型应用方向，看清技术与经济交汇处的真实图景。
揭示个体理性在宏观层面形成新的结构性挑战。
提供一套清晰可用的分析框架，为普通人在大变革中找到自身位置的。​
敬请关注:AI经济学站在三界外看AGI系列文章-生成式AI时代财富的创造、分配与转移深度分析。 https://t.co/3TSS0cnzLy

[MAGA Strategist @idlecloudbird]

@fi56622380 6月unit economy单位经济账只有Athropic能算过来，A+O合计6-7G算力只有1100亿收入，每G瓦对应收入仅170亿左右，对应每G瓦直接成本100亿，加上财务成本已经没什么利润了

[MAGA Strategist @idlecloudbird]

@jessyshen 政府对老百姓有用的就是基础设施建设维护，美国可能做了，但是效率不敢恭维，更没有资格呵呵中国

[MAGA Strategist @idlecloudbird]

@jessyshen 到美国一样交税，税率还可能更高

[MAGA Strategist @idlecloudbird]

@maoshen 要考的

[MAGA Strategist @idlecloudbird]

@GavinSBaker @_sholtodouglas https://t.co/l8lnLNHKKA

[MAGA Strategist @idlecloudbird]

This is truly an extremely absurd and reckless accusation and attempt to shift responsibility. All the risks discussed here stem from the commercialization of large models. Whether it’s Sonnet or Opus, or the recently panic-inducing Mythos (which possesses extremely strong automated vulnerability discovery and offensive cyber-attack capabilities), they are all money-making tools under Anthropic. Relying on these tools, Anthropic has already generated hundreds of billions of dollars in revenue, secured a $965 billion financing valuation, and is pushing toward a $2 trillion IPO valuation. Does it really have no responsibility or ability to control and regulate how users of its models use them in a safe manner, and to ensure that the models do not output dangerous, harmful content and behaviors?
As the biggest beneficiary, instead of taking measures and finding ways to address the risk issues, it goes around exaggerating the risks of the models to scare the public, shifting the responsibility for risks onto customers and the government, lobbying the government to suppress competitors in the name of regulation, and dreaming of eliminating all other companies to become the world’s only private enterprise. I believe that such a company and such people will ultimately have to pay the price for everything they have done.

[MAGA Strategist @idlecloudbird]

@DarioAmodei https://t.co/l8lnLNHKKA

[MAGA Strategist @idlecloudbird]

This is truly an extremely absurd and reckless accusation and attempt to shift responsibility. All the risks discussed here stem from the commercialization of large models. Whether it’s Sonnet or Opus, or the recently panic-inducing Mythos (which possesses extremely strong automated vulnerability discovery and offensive cyber-attack capabilities), they are all money-making tools under Anthropic. Relying on these tools, Anthropic has already generated hundreds of billions of dollars in revenue, secured a $965 billion financing valuation, and is pushing toward a $2 trillion IPO valuation. Does it really have no responsibility or ability to control and regulate how users of its models use them in a safe manner, and to ensure that the models do not output dangerous, harmful content and behaviors?
As the biggest beneficiary, instead of taking measures and finding ways to address the risk issues, it goes around exaggerating the risks of the models to scare the public, shifting the responsibility for risks onto customers and the government, lobbying the government to suppress competitors in the name of regulation, and dreaming of eliminating all other companies to become the world’s only private enterprise. I believe that such a company and such people will ultimately have to pay the price for everything they have done.

[MAGA Strategist @idlecloudbird]

@Ronalfa @DarioAmodei https://t.co/l8lnLNHKKA

[MAGA Strategist @idlecloudbird]

This is truly an extremely absurd and reckless accusation and attempt to shift responsibility. All the risks discussed here stem from the commercialization of large models. Whether it’s Sonnet or Opus, or the recently panic-inducing Mythos (which possesses extremely strong automated vulnerability discovery and offensive cyber-attack capabilities), they are all money-making tools under Anthropic. Relying on these tools, Anthropic has already generated hundreds of billions of dollars in revenue, secured a $965 billion financing valuation, and is pushing toward a $2 trillion IPO valuation. Does it really have no responsibility or ability to control and regulate how users of its models use them in a safe manner, and to ensure that the models do not output dangerous, harmful content and behaviors?
As the biggest beneficiary, instead of taking measures and finding ways to address the risk issues, it goes around exaggerating the risks of the models to scare the public, shifting the responsibility for risks onto customers and the government, lobbying the government to suppress competitors in the name of regulation, and dreaming of eliminating all other companies to become the world’s only private enterprise. I believe that such a company and such people will ultimately have to pay the price for everything they have done.

[MAGA Strategist @idlecloudbird]

@_sholtodouglas @GavinSBaker https://t.co/l8lnLNHKKA

[MAGA Strategist @idlecloudbird]

This is truly an extremely absurd and reckless accusation and attempt to shift responsibility. All the risks discussed here stem from the commercialization of large models. Whether it’s Sonnet or Opus, or the recently panic-inducing Mythos (which possesses extremely strong automated vulnerability discovery and offensive cyber-attack capabilities), they are all money-making tools under Anthropic. Relying on these tools, Anthropic has already generated hundreds of billions of dollars in revenue, secured a $965 billion financing valuation, and is pushing toward a $2 trillion IPO valuation. Does it really have no responsibility or ability to control and regulate how users of its models use them in a safe manner, and to ensure that the models do not output dangerous, harmful content and behaviors?
As the biggest beneficiary, instead of taking measures and finding ways to address the risk issues, it goes around exaggerating the risks of the models to scare the public, shifting the responsibility for risks onto customers and the government, lobbying the government to suppress competitors in the name of regulation, and dreaming of eliminating all other companies to become the world’s only private enterprise. I believe that such a company and such people will ultimately have to pay the price for everything they have done.

[MAGA Strategist @idlecloudbird]

这真是极其荒唐的胡乱指控和推卸责任。这里讨论的所有风险都来自于大模型的商业化行为，不管是Sonnet还是Opus，还有最近因具備極強的自動化漏洞挖掘與進攻性網路攻擊潛力而引起恐慌的Mythos，都是Athropic旗下的赚钱工具，凭着这些工具Athropic已获得几百亿美元的销售收入，9650亿的融资估值为，并且推进20,000亿美元估值的IPO，难道没有责任和能力控制和规范模型的使用者以安全的方式使用模型、确保模型不输出危险几点、有害的内容与行为吗？作为最大的受益者不采取措施和想办法解决风险的问题，反倒是到处夸大模型的风险吓唬民众、把风险责任推给客户和政府，游说政府以监管为名打压竞争对手，妄想消灭所有其他企业成为全球唯一民营企业的美梦。相信这样的企业和人最终要为自己所做的一切付出代价。

[MAGA Strategist @idlecloudbird]

This is truly an extremely absurd and reckless accusation and attempt to shift responsibility. All the risks discussed here stem from the commercialization of large models. Whether it’s Sonnet or Opus, or the recently panic-inducing Mythos (which possesses extremely strong automated vulnerability discovery and offensive cyber-attack capabilities), they are all money-making tools under Anthropic. Relying on these tools, Anthropic has already generated hundreds of billions of dollars in revenue, secured a $965 billion financing valuation, and is pushing toward a $2 trillion IPO valuation. Does it really have no responsibility or ability to control and regulate how users of its models use them in a safe manner, and to ensure that the models do not output dangerous, harmful content and behaviors?
As the biggest beneficiary, instead of taking measures and finding ways to address the risk issues, it goes around exaggerating the risks of the models to scare the public, shifting the responsibility for risks onto customers and the government, lobbying the government to suppress competitors in the name of regulation, and dreaming of eliminating all other companies to become the world’s only private enterprise. I believe that such a company and such people will ultimately have to pay the price for everything they have done.

[MAGA Strategist @idlecloudbird]

这真是极其荒唐的胡乱指控和推卸责任。这里讨论的所有风险都来自于大模型的商业化行为，不管是Sonnet还是Opus，还有最近因具備極強的自動化漏洞挖掘與進攻性網路攻擊潛力而引起恐慌的Mythos，都是Athropic旗下的赚钱工具，凭着这些工具Athropic已获得几百亿美元的销售收入，9650亿的融资估值为，并且推进20,000亿美元估值的IPO，难道没有责任和能力控制和规范模型的使用者以安全的方式使用模型、确保模型不输出危险几点、有害的内容与行为吗？作为最大的受益者不采取措施和想办法解决风险的问题，反倒是到处夸大模型的风险吓唬民众、把风险责任推给客户和政府，游说政府以监管为名打压竞争对手，妄想消灭所有其他企业成为全球唯一民营企业的美梦。相信这样的企业和人最终要为自己所做的一切付出代价。

[MAGA Strategist @idlecloudbird]

这真是极其荒唐的胡乱指控和推卸责任。这里讨论的所有风险都来自于大模型的商业化行为，不管是Sonnet还是Opus，还有最近因具備極強的自動化漏洞挖掘與進攻性網路攻擊潛力而引起恐慌的Mythos，都是Athropic旗下的赚钱工具，凭着这些工具Athropic已获得几百亿美元的销售收入，9650亿的融资估值为，并且推进20,000亿美元估值的IPO，难道没有责任和能力控制和规范模型的使用者以安全的方式使用模型、确保模型不输出危险几点、有害的内容与行为吗？作为最大的受益者不采取措施和想办法解决风险的问题，反倒是到处夸大模型的风险吓唬民众、把风险责任推给客户和政府，游说政府以监管为名打压竞争对手，妄想消灭所有其他企业成为全球唯一民营企业的美梦。相信这样的企业和人最终要为自己所做的一切付出代价。

[MAGA Strategist @idlecloudbird]

@snowboat84 写的很好，你是有团队吗？一个人的话效率也太高了