Apart from the absurdity and demonic degeneracy of the claim itself, this exposes a deeper theological problem. The reasoning implicitly normalizes male lust as something primarily managed through external regulation rather than internal moral responsibility.
In the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus radically internalizes sin. He does not say, “If someone causes you to lust, they are guilty.” He says, “If YOU look lustfully, YOU have sinned.” The burden is placed first on the heart, the eyes, the will of the individual.
That is why Christ says, “If your right eye causes you to sin, pluck it out.” The problem begins within. Moral failure is not outsourced onto other people’s clothing, appearance, or existence.
By contrast, this kind of reasoning creates a framework where responsibility is continually externalized:
Women must veil so men do not lust,
men must grow beards so other men are not tempted, society must endlessly regulate appearances because self-control is treated as secondary.
Christianity addresses desire at the root. It confronts the human heart itself rather than building an ever-expanding system of external restrictions to compensate for it.
Apparently living in South Africa under white genocide is better than living in USA with its “glory”. The Trump campaign to smear SA is failing horribly!
A Heidelberg University study restricted phone use for just 72 hours.
Brain scans before. Brain scans after.
The researchers were stunned by what they found.
Here's what 3 days without your phone actually does to your brain:
Palmeiras' youth team went to play in a FUTSAL TOURNAMENT in the United States
We all can now tell the difference between football and “soccer” it’s never the same bro😭