Eric

Go, Go MAX! Identifying collaborators and calling out subversion and deception.

[Eric @ifindcollaborat]

@cahigg16 @rawsalerts You realize Iran didn't start this war?

[Eric @ifindcollaborat]

@Archimedes38085 @onlyskypace Even after that explanation, you have the units wrong.

[Eric @ifindcollaborat]

@jakeirish_ @realDonaldTrump Voting Democrat won't help - both parties serve the same master. They just go about it in different ways.

[Eric @ifindcollaborat]

@bobby_0081 @ChadBitcoinFam @IanCarrollShow Your statement is a go-to counter statement ego-centric jews love saying. Since when is Israel plural ("them")? Israel is not synonymous with jews, just like Italy is not synonymous with catholics.

[Eric @ifindcollaborat]

@Jennnyyyyyy 44
You multiply the top numbers and then add their sum to their product to solve for the number on bottom.

9*2+9+2=29
5*5+5+5=35
8*4+8+4=44

[Eric @ifindcollaborat]

@grok @pretty_sarlin The patient on the left and in the center are in body bags, so I'd say they have the lowest chance of survival.

[Eric @ifindcollaborat]

@lacrazyguy @Simi_2210_ Hah, please elaborate

[Eric @ifindcollaborat]

Alright, I found a response in the comments that is more unequivocal than my logic.

Credit to linked post below.

"Just double what was added to the last number and add it."

14
25
47
91

So, 2(25-14)+25 = 47
2(47-25)+47=91
2(91-47)+91=179
2(179-91)+179=355

This is the unequivocal and correct response.

https://t.co/onzzLph80u

[steve @steve011971]

@escapedtobefree @Simi_2210_ Just double what was added to last number , 11,22,44,88,176

[Eric @ifindcollaborat]

174, 179, or 190 depending on one assumption the short sequence forces you to make since the sequence doesn't give establish unequivocal precedent.

Up until the question mark, the formula is

2(Previous number) - 3

But, the sequence doesn't give enough information to confirm why we are subtracting 3.

Are we subtracting 3 for no condition and will simply continue to subtract 3? If so, 2(91)-3=179

Or, are we subtracting 3 based on the difference between the digits of the previous number? For example 1-4=-3, 2-5=-3, 4-7=-3. If so 9-1=8, so 182+8= 190.

Or, are we just taking the absolute value of the difference between the digits and always subtracting it? If so 182-8=174.

If I'm wrong and I missed something, please point it out.

[Eric @ifindcollaborat]

@steve011971 @escapedtobefree @Simi_2210_ As simple as this response is, it is the most unequivocal response I've found in the comments. Thank you.

I'm going to reference it under my response.
https://t.co/jA6o2FyUDL

[Eric @ifindcollaborat]

174, 179, or 190 depending on one assumption the short sequence forces you to make since the sequence doesn't give establish unequivocal precedent.

Up until the question mark, the formula is

2(Previous number) - 3

But, the sequence doesn't give enough information to confirm why we are subtracting 3.

Are we subtracting 3 for no condition and will simply continue to subtract 3? If so, 2(91)-3=179

Or, are we subtracting 3 based on the difference between the digits of the previous number? For example 1-4=-3, 2-5=-3, 4-7=-3. If so 9-1=8, so 182+8= 190.

Or, are we just taking the absolute value of the difference between the digits and always subtracting it? If so 182-8=174.

If I'm wrong and I missed something, please point it out.

[Eric @ifindcollaborat]

@AdrienNash12 @Simi_2210_ Lol, is this what you did on tests in school? "Sorry, you wrote this wrong." You have to work with what you have.

Here you go:
https://t.co/jA6o2FyUDL

Please let me know if there are more potential answers to this ambiguous sequence.

[Eric @ifindcollaborat]

174, 179, or 190 depending on one assumption the short sequence forces you to make since the sequence doesn't give establish unequivocal precedent.

Up until the question mark, the formula is

2(Previous number) - 3

But, the sequence doesn't give enough information to confirm why we are subtracting 3.

Are we subtracting 3 for no condition and will simply continue to subtract 3? If so, 2(91)-3=179

Or, are we subtracting 3 based on the difference between the digits of the previous number? For example 1-4=-3, 2-5=-3, 4-7=-3. If so 9-1=8, so 182+8= 190.

Or, are we just taking the absolute value of the difference between the digits and always subtracting it? If so 182-8=174.

If I'm wrong and I missed something, please point it out.

[Eric @ifindcollaborat]

@Liya_3310 @Simi_2210_ Here you go:
https://t.co/jA6o2FyUDL

Please let me know if there are more potential answers to this ambiguous sequence.

[Eric @ifindcollaborat]

174, 179, or 190 depending on one assumption the short sequence forces you to make since the sequence doesn't give establish unequivocal precedent.

Up until the question mark, the formula is

2(Previous number) - 3

But, the sequence doesn't give enough information to confirm why we are subtracting 3.

Are we subtracting 3 for no condition and will simply continue to subtract 3? If so, 2(91)-3=179

Or, are we subtracting 3 based on the difference between the digits of the previous number? For example 1-4=-3, 2-5=-3, 4-7=-3. If so 9-1=8, so 182+8= 190.

Or, are we just taking the absolute value of the difference between the digits and always subtracting it? If so 182-8=174.

If I'm wrong and I missed something, please point it out.

[Eric @ifindcollaborat]

@Shahidjam45 @Simi_2210_ @SuGaR_Babbyyy But you missed other solutions that are also correct due to the ambiguity of the sequence.

Here you go:
https://t.co/jA6o2FyUDL

Please let me know if there are more potential answers to this ambiguous sequence.

[Eric @ifindcollaborat]

174, 179, or 190 depending on one assumption the short sequence forces you to make since the sequence doesn't give establish unequivocal precedent.

Up until the question mark, the formula is

2(Previous number) - 3

But, the sequence doesn't give enough information to confirm why we are subtracting 3.

Are we subtracting 3 for no condition and will simply continue to subtract 3? If so, 2(91)-3=179

Or, are we subtracting 3 based on the difference between the digits of the previous number? For example 1-4=-3, 2-5=-3, 4-7=-3. If so 9-1=8, so 182+8= 190.

Or, are we just taking the absolute value of the difference between the digits and always subtracting it? If so 182-8=174.

If I'm wrong and I missed something, please point it out.

[Eric @ifindcollaborat]

@Crazypostalbob @Simi_2210_ @SuGaR_Babbyyy Bob, you missed other acceptable answers.

Here you go:
https://t.co/jA6o2FyUDL

Please let me know if there are more potential answers to this ambiguous sequence.

[Eric @ifindcollaborat]

174, 179, or 190 depending on one assumption the short sequence forces you to make since the sequence doesn't give establish unequivocal precedent.

Up until the question mark, the formula is

2(Previous number) - 3

But, the sequence doesn't give enough information to confirm why we are subtracting 3.

Are we subtracting 3 for no condition and will simply continue to subtract 3? If so, 2(91)-3=179

Or, are we subtracting 3 based on the difference between the digits of the previous number? For example 1-4=-3, 2-5=-3, 4-7=-3. If so 9-1=8, so 182+8= 190.

Or, are we just taking the absolute value of the difference between the digits and always subtracting it? If so 182-8=174.

If I'm wrong and I missed something, please point it out.

[Eric @ifindcollaborat]

@SuGaR_Babbyyy @Simi_2210_ Here you go:
https://t.co/jA6o2FyUDL

Please let me know if there are more potential answers to this ambiguous sequence.

[Eric @ifindcollaborat]

174, 179, or 190 depending on one assumption the short sequence forces you to make since the sequence doesn't give establish unequivocal precedent.

Up until the question mark, the formula is

2(Previous number) - 3

But, the sequence doesn't give enough information to confirm why we are subtracting 3.

Are we subtracting 3 for no condition and will simply continue to subtract 3? If so, 2(91)-3=179

Or, are we subtracting 3 based on the difference between the digits of the previous number? For example 1-4=-3, 2-5=-3, 4-7=-3. If so 9-1=8, so 182+8= 190.

Or, are we just taking the absolute value of the difference between the digits and always subtracting it? If so 182-8=174.

If I'm wrong and I missed something, please point it out.

[Eric @ifindcollaborat]

@Miche2Bern @karahan @Simi_2210_ There's at least three different answers that are acceptable due to unaddressed ambiguity in the test's sequence:

https://t.co/jA6o2FyUDL

[Eric @ifindcollaborat]

174, 179, or 190 depending on one assumption the short sequence forces you to make since the sequence doesn't give establish unequivocal precedent.

Up until the question mark, the formula is

2(Previous number) - 3

But, the sequence doesn't give enough information to confirm why we are subtracting 3.

Are we subtracting 3 for no condition and will simply continue to subtract 3? If so, 2(91)-3=179

Or, are we subtracting 3 based on the difference between the digits of the previous number? For example 1-4=-3, 2-5=-3, 4-7=-3. If so 9-1=8, so 182+8= 190.

Or, are we just taking the absolute value of the difference between the digits and always subtracting it? If so 182-8=174.

If I'm wrong and I missed something, please point it out.

[Eric @ifindcollaborat]

@AlefFrozi @karahan @Simi_2210_ You're thinking differently than most. Well done. Here's a step further:

https://t.co/jA6o2FyUDL

[Eric @ifindcollaborat]

174, 179, or 190 depending on one assumption the short sequence forces you to make since the sequence doesn't give establish unequivocal precedent.

Up until the question mark, the formula is

2(Previous number) - 3

But, the sequence doesn't give enough information to confirm why we are subtracting 3.

Are we subtracting 3 for no condition and will simply continue to subtract 3? If so, 2(91)-3=179

Or, are we subtracting 3 based on the difference between the digits of the previous number? For example 1-4=-3, 2-5=-3, 4-7=-3. If so 9-1=8, so 182+8= 190.

Or, are we just taking the absolute value of the difference between the digits and always subtracting it? If so 182-8=174.

If I'm wrong and I missed something, please point it out.

[Eric @ifindcollaborat]

@karahan @Simi_2210_ I have more severe ADHD:

https://t.co/jA6o2FyUDL

[Eric @ifindcollaborat]

174, 179, or 190 depending on one assumption the short sequence forces you to make since the sequence doesn't give establish unequivocal precedent.

Up until the question mark, the formula is

2(Previous number) - 3

But, the sequence doesn't give enough information to confirm why we are subtracting 3.

Are we subtracting 3 for no condition and will simply continue to subtract 3? If so, 2(91)-3=179

Or, are we subtracting 3 based on the difference between the digits of the previous number? For example 1-4=-3, 2-5=-3, 4-7=-3. If so 9-1=8, so 182+8= 190.

Or, are we just taking the absolute value of the difference between the digits and always subtracting it? If so 182-8=174.

If I'm wrong and I missed something, please point it out.

[Eric @ifindcollaborat]

@BeBrave457 @IRanMediaco Lol, you act as if Iran started this war. Iran is not the aggressor and is calling for lasting peace.

[Eric @ifindcollaborat]

@Villgecrazylady @grok who is funding Boston's first Holocaust Museum?