@ECISVEEP You just give two facts which donโt align or explain how this is fake? It clearly says that SIR changes are upheld by SC which they denied and ECI cannot alone take decision to add additional form . Either way, it is illegal? ๐คท๐ฝ
Indian snacks in Canada are... different.
In a good way.
Canada is enforcing a new policy where packaged foods high in saturated fats, sugars, and sodium need unavoidable front-of-package labels disclosing their composition.
Similar to cigarettes.
When I returned to India I couldn't help but miss these labels. During my month in Canada, these labels were the difference between me impulsively picking an unhealthy snack up off the shelf and leaving it there. The label is essentially the government saying, "This food is bad for you. It is linked to chronic diseases. Eat it at your own risk." Given the abundance of healthier options that didn't have these labels (because they weren't high in sat fat, sugars, or sodium), I'd often take a step or two down the aisle and purchase a similar but healthier product in the same category. Easy.
I wish FSSAI would implement something similar in India, so that Indian consumers can make healthier and more informed decisions without having to parse complex back-of-package nutrition labels.
@Pankajpadekar@tequilaaaa3 Sexual liberation ka matlab bhi pta hai tujhe? Mujhe pta hai tu gatar te aata hai . Teri shod gatarchap hai nali k keede . What is high standard according to u ? Tere ethics toh bahut ache hai ? Teri bhen ko toh MMA aata hoga? Chutiya