Ikuzo

$IKUZO: 0x616acb71b9ff11d99ffc9abc4fb7ce8ff7c47075

[Ikuzo @ikuzo_tech]

@himgajria @fintechfrank Not the $IKUZO

[Ikuzo @ikuzo_tech]

Cycle 1: 732 addresses held $IKUZO at some point.
211 were paid.

Here is exactly why.

To be paid for a cycle you have to still hold at the
end of it, and never have reduced your position
during it. Holding flat counts. Buying more counts.
Selling any part does not.

493 addresses sold something during the cycle. They
were not paid, and their share went to the people who
did not sell.

Check your own address — it will tell you which
group you were in:

https://t.co/kuhbcklMsf

[Ikuzo @ikuzo_tech]

@monadverse That's we are.

[Ikuzo @ikuzo_tech]

Cycle 1 settled. 1.035274 ETH divided among 211
holders.

The numbers:

distributed 1.035274 ETH
holders paid 211
snapshots 16
largest 0.061265 ETH
median 0.000987 ETH
smallest 0.000012 ETH
dust forward 0.000026 ETH

Fees were claimed out of the pons escrow into the
treasury, the treasury's whole balance above a small
gas reserve became the pot, and the pot was divided
by how much each address held and for how long.

The 0.000026 ETH that the division couldn't place
wasn't kept. It rolled into cycle 2.

Proof of the whole calculation:
7e9e571ba1c249db20ee32fa4043204daf7e133a830d1096cff99a58c77b03d7

Open https://t.co/V4eLAX952E and your browser will redo it
from the published snapshots — same code that signed
the payments. If the hash it produces doesn't match
the one above, the page says so.

Don't take my word for any of this. That's the point.

Cycle 2 is open.

行くぞ

[Ikuzo @ikuzo_tech]

Show it off boys 😎

[Ikuzo @ikuzo_tech]

Cycle 1 settled. 1.035274 ETH divided among 211
holders.

The numbers:

distributed 1.035274 ETH
holders paid 211
snapshots 16
largest 0.061265 ETH
median 0.000987 ETH
smallest 0.000012 ETH
dust forward 0.000026 ETH

Fees were claimed out of the pons escrow into the
treasury, the treasury's whole balance above a small
gas reserve became the pot, and the pot was divided
by how much each address held and for how long.

The 0.000026 ETH that the division couldn't place
wasn't kept. It rolled into cycle 2.

Proof of the whole calculation:
7e9e571ba1c249db20ee32fa4043204daf7e133a830d1096cff99a58c77b03d7

Open https://t.co/V4eLAX952E and your browser will redo it
from the published snapshots — same code that signed
the payments. If the hash it produces doesn't match
the one above, the page says so.

Don't take my word for any of this. That's the point.

Cycle 2 is open.

行くぞ

[Ikuzo @ikuzo_tech]

Hold more, get more.
Hold longer, get more.

Snapshots hit at random. No schedule, no warning.

Nothing to time. Just hold.

[Ikuzo @ikuzo_tech]

First distribution in about four hours.

The treasury:
0x48B4F953FA38c63F55EeA1D4d3b067F40136017c

It holds 0.662 ETH right now, with more still
accruing in the pons escrow. That wallet receives
claimed creator fees and pays holders. It holds
nothing else.

no team funds, no reserves, nothing
that isn't on its way to you.

Watch it. Every payment will leave from that
address, on chain, where you can count them.

[Ikuzo @ikuzo_tech]

More than 17% of the supply are burned!

[Ikuzo @ikuzo_tech]

ON THINGS THAT HOLD

We came from fashion.

Not as an origin story, and not as a credential. As
the reason this is built the way it is.

Fashion is an industry organised around one gap: the
distance between the image and the object.

A photograph flatters everything. Good light forgives
a bad seam. The dress that looks extraordinary in a
lookbook can fall apart on the second wear, and by
then the photograph has already done its work.

You learn, doing that job, that the photograph is not
the thing. The thing is the thing. And the difference
between them is invisible at a distance and obvious
in the hand.

That is also, exactly, the disease of this market.

Everything looks identical in a screenshot. Every
token has a chart, a countdown, a set of promises set
in the same typeface. Nothing in the image tells you
whether there is a garment underneath it or only the
photograph of one.

The industry has industrialised the gap we spent
years learning to close.

So we built for the hand, not the lookbook.

*

A pattern is the closest thing fashion has to a
proof. A published specification, precise to the
millimetre. Anyone holding it can cut the garment and
check your work. It does not ask to be believed. It
can be measured and found wanting.

Every claim this project makes is published as a
pattern.

Each snapshot records the block it was read at, so
anyone can re-read the same balances and arrive at
the same numbers. Each distribution publishes every
address, every amount, and a hash over the whole
calculation.

The website and the payout engine import the same
code. The number you are shown and the number you are
paid are not two implementations that agree — they
are one implementation.

Nothing to take on trust, because nothing here cannot
be redone.

*

Anyone in this trade will tell you the same thing:
turn a garment inside out and you know everything.
The finishing, the tolerances, whether the maker
cared when nobody was going to look.

Almost no one ever looks. It is the part that does
not photograph.

We built the inside.

There is a check that adds up every token in
existence and refuses to record a snapshot if a
single holder is unaccounted for. In an average, a
holder nobody mentioned and a holder of nothing are
the same number. They would have been paid nothing
while every system reported success.

Nobody will ever see that check. It caught a real
omission the day it was written.

That is the standard. Not "we would never." Not
"trust the team." A mechanism that makes the failure
visible, running whether or not anyone is watching.

*

Our mark is a hakama. Not a shape we liked — a
garment. Cut from a pattern, sewn to a tolerance,
meant to be worn rather than displayed.

*

We think the only honest claim a project can make is
one a stranger can prove false.

Everything here is built so that it can be.

https://t.co/3oie9AKGlW
行くぞ

[Ikuzo @ikuzo_tech]

$IKUZO distribution schedule — now live.

Snapshots: about every 30 minutes.
Distributions: about every 6 hours.

Roughly a dozen snapshots go into each distribution.
Your share is your AVERAGE across all of them, not
your balance at any one of them.

The exact moment each snapshot is taken is random
inside its window, and never announced in advance.
That is deliberate. If the clock were public, the
optimal strategy would be to hold for two minutes
around each one instead of holding at all — and the
people actually carrying the token would pay for it.

So: no schedule to time. Hold through the cycle, or
count for less. That's the whole design.

Excluded from every distribution, derived from the
chain at each snapshot rather than typed into a
config file:

burn 0x...dead 152,009,063
liquidity 0x8366a39c... 227,088,097
locked LP 0x267444d0... 81,632,653
+ the curve, fee escrow, buyback vault,
position manager and the treasury itself

Those aren't people. They don't receive, and they
don't count toward the denominator either.

Every snapshot publishes the block it was read at
and its hash. Every distribution publishes the whole
calculation. Recompute any of it yourself:

https://t.co/V4eLAX9CSc

[Ikuzo @ikuzo_tech]

also the dev supply burned.

[Ikuzo @ikuzo_tech]

Now $IKUZO have a dexscreener page!

[Ikuzo @ikuzo_tech]

Continuity weighting is coming to $IKUZO. Here is exactly
what it does, and what it doesn't.

— How it works today —

Your share of each distribution is your average balance
across several snapshots taken by hand, at times nobody
knows in advance. Hold for half a cycle and you count for
half. There's no schedule to front-run because there isn't
a schedule.

That part isn't changing. It's the floor everything else
is built on.

— What's being added —

Hold across cycles, and part of your balance starts
counting for more.

weight = average + min(average, sustained) × (tier − 1)

Two words in that line do all the work.

"sustained" is the LOWEST balance you held at any snapshot
across your streak. Not what you hold now — the trough.
Hold one token for four cycles, buy ten percent of supply
the night before a settlement, and those new tokens count
for exactly 1×. The bonus attaches to what you actually
carried, not to what you're holding when the music stops.

There is nothing to time. Same property as the base
mechanism, for the same reason.

The second word is the cap. The bonus applies to a fixed
slice of your balance, not all of it. A wallet twenty
times larger than yours doesn't get twenty times the
bonus. It gets the same one you do.

Size can't buy duration. It can only wait, like everybody
else.

— What it is not —

This does not increase the pot. The pot is trading fees.
That's the entire input.

Weighting changes only how the same money divides — which
means every bit one holder gains, another gives up. It
shifts the split toward people who stay and away from
people who are merely large. If everyone holds through,
the distribution is identical to today's.

I'd rather say that myself than have someone work it out
and say it for me.

— No staking contract —

No lock. No custody. No approval to sign. No new contract
holding your tokens, and therefore no audit surface and
nothing that can strand funds — because nothing here ever
touches them.

Every input is a balance already published in a past
snapshot. The weights are recomputable by anyone, from
data that's already public, using the same code that does
the paying.

Your tokens never leave your wallet. They just have to
still be in it.

— When —

Streaks are computed from settled cycles, so nothing takes
effect until cycles have settled. The first distribution
comes first.

Built, tested, and not shipped until it's right.

https://t.co/3oie9ALebu
行くぞ

[Ikuzo @ikuzo_tech]

Right now your share is your average balance.

Soon it'll also count how long you've carried it.

The bonus is capped — it applies to the first slice
of what you hold, not all of it. So a large wallet
can't buy a bigger multiplier. It can only hold one,
exactly like everyone else.

No lock. No contract. Nothing to sign.

[Ikuzo @ikuzo_tech]

Next up: a staking layer.

Lock, and your average counts for more in the split.

Two things stay true regardless: the maths is still
published every cycle, and you can still recompute
it yourself. A multiplier is only worth having if
it's as checkable as the thing it multiplies.

Not live yet.

[Ikuzo @ikuzo_tech]

How the split is calculated.

Not by what you hold. By what you held, across the
whole cycle.

Several times per cycle, at times nobody knows in
advance, every holder's balance is recorded at one
block. Your share is your AVERAGE across those
snapshots, not your balance at any single moment.

Miss a snapshot and it counts as zero for you.

[Ikuzo @ikuzo_tech]

burn completed.

https://t.co/uoSu4K0Q4U

[Ikuzo @ikuzo_tech]

https://t.co/3oie9AKGlW is up.

Six pages. No wallet connect on any of them

nothing to sign, no keys held.

The one that matters is /verify: open a settled
cycle and your browser recomputes the entire split
from the published snapshots, using the same code
the keeper paid with.

Not a report of what happened. The arithmetic.

[Ikuzo @ikuzo_tech]

行くぞ

$IKUZO is live on Robinhood Chain.

1,000,000,000 supply. 100% minted to the bonding
curve — no presale, no team allocation.

The 15% I bought off the curve is burned.

Trading fees are collected in ETH and split among
holders by average balance across snapshots taken
without warning. No single moment to hold across.

CA: 0x616acb71b9ff11d99ffc9abc4fb7ce8ff7c47075