@TimNguyen2013@dextune It's not for coding. It's cheap worker. May be you can get implementation plan created by Opus and then can ask any model to implement it. Even Luna works for me when Opus did the planning.
@Yuchenj_UW For coding, creative thinking and video editing, Opus 5.5 is better than astra.
If I consider price or usage limit then Opus 5.5 is much better than Astra.
I have both subscriptions. Claude one is more useful.
If 1/100 is saying opposite, then don't trust and do your research.
@melvindvivas Yeah ๐ฏ. Opus 5.5 is pure joy. I haven't enjoyed using any other model like that. Give it any task and it's doing much better than any other model.
@giadotai Auto will be useless. Trust me.
Claude will route to Haiku 4.5 which is worst model. Luna is much better, faster and cheaper.
GPT will route to Astra even if query is simple and your limit will exhaust faster.
Auto mode won't be able to make better decisions than you for sure.
@Da7_Tech Opus 5.5 is the greatest release of this year. This model is really good at anything I gave to it whether it's software engineering or video editing.
But there is one area where OpenAI is at top, and no one is close. Image Generation. GPT Image 2.5 is impressive.
@notjazii If they can launch Sonnet or Haiku 5.5 next week then it will be really great.
Currently I'm enjoying Opus 5.5 and very much impressed with it. ๐
@MiniMaxAgent Please drop benchmarks too. We want to know whether it can be worth using over competition.
- GPT 6 Luna
- Mimo 2.6 Pro
- Deepseek V4.1 Flash Vision.
- GLM 5.3 Flash
Where it stands against M3, M2.7?
@Da7_Tech Both doesn't have trial. I don't want to pay just for trying out.
My current subscriptions:-
- Claude Pro (Opus 5.5 for planning and writing prompts for images/videos)
- GPT Plus (for hq images)
- 2xSuperGrok (Video generation)
- 2xGoogle AI Pro (QC - video/image/audio to text)