Really brutal. The phishing email is written quite convincingly, and it comes from the official Trezor domain.
At least tens of millions will be lost; hopefully not hundreds of millions. Insane f*ckup from Trezor.
Our third-party e-mail provider has been breached. Please be aware that the email named ‘Critical Security Alert: STM32 Entropy Vulnerability’ is not coming from us, and it’s a phishing attempt. Do not click on any link.
We have taken down the domain, and we are investigating the situation, including how the hackers got access to our legit domain.
🚨JUPITER DAO PROPOSAL TO MAKE JUP A MEMBERSHIP TOKEN!
A new proposal landed on Jupiter Research today to turn solana:JUPyiwrYJFskUPiHa7hkeR8VUtAeFoSYbKedZNsDvCN into an economic membership token.
It wants staking tiers with fee discounts on swaps and perps, the option to pay fees in solana:JUPyiwrYJFskUPiHa7hkeR8VUtAeFoSYbKedZNsDvCN at a cut rate, and 70% of protocol revenue used to buy solana:JUPyiwrYJFskUPiHa7hkeR8VUtAeFoSYbKedZNsDvCN and burn all of it, up from the current 50% buyback slice.
It is a forum proposal, not a live vote.
The best way to own $SOL last month? $DFDV.
August 2026 Performance:
• $DFDV +110%
• $SLON 2x Levered ETF +93%
• $BSOL ETF +43%
• $SOL +42%
• $SOL Perp +41%
There is no second-best way to own levered $SOL exposure.
$DFDV was the first U.S.-listed non-BTC Digital Asset Treasury (DAT). Now we’re working to become the first non-BTC variable-rate digital credit issuer with $CHAD.
$CHAD is designed to take the digital credit model pioneered with bitcoin:native and apply it to what we believe is an even more compelling underlying asset: $SOL.
Why? @solana doesn’t just have the potential to appreciate. It’s a productive asset with native yield.
At the contemplated terms, $CHAD features a 13% headline dividend paid daily, with an effective yield of roughly 14.4% at a $9 issuance price, backed by a $SOL treasury that can generate organic yield to help service the dividend.
@0xinliberty & @CryptoIRGuy break down the entire thesis in our latest presentation:
00:00 Introduction
00:55 Introducing $CHAD
02:17 Why digital credit exists
03:41 Bitcoin proved the model. What comes next?
04:09 Why $SOL may be better collateral for digital credit
05:43 The path toward $10 par
06:40 Why we have conviction in Solana
08:15 Tokenization, stablecoins & agentic finance
10:37 Why DFDV is positioned to issue $CHAD
11:37 The SOL Boost Framework
12:34 Intelligent leverage vs. liquidation risk
13:30 Growing SOL Per Share
14:25 The $CHAD yield engine
16:00 Pro forma coverage metrics
16:44 Stress testing SOL at -25% and -50%
17:40 The $CHAD thesis
18:37 Closing remarks
Check it out. 👇
Strategy has acquired 34,164 BTC for ~$2.54 billion at ~$74,395 per bitcoin and has achieved BTC Yield of 9.5% YTD 2026. As of 4/19/2026, we hodl 815,061 $BTC acquired for ~$61.56 billion at ~$75,527 per bitcoin. $MSTR $STRC
https://t.co/NYkkvObeb4
There are over 5000 Cedar DAO wallets that have been active in the last 12 months.
In real terms, that's a huge community, well worth saving.
Let's keep the faith.
We Are Cedar.
Did you guys know that you own Atlas? Sam said so sometime ago. He only pretended to own it b/c "there was no other legal structure available and [he] needed a standard Ltd company for all partnerships".
So now you own three things:
- The Atlas Wallet
- The token supply
- The LP
If you are a Cedar DAO token holder, then let me say this to you:
I am a Cedar DAO token holder. Our goals are 100% aligned.
I quit my job and have dedicated almost 5 years of my life to this project and community.
It has been the most toxic, damaging and stressful experience of my life.
I entered this project with a great career and a 20 year record of excellence and success in business; an impeccable reputation.
If Atlas/Cedar fails, that's my entire legacy destroyed and years of my life wasted.
There is a concerted campaign right now to drive a wedge between us holders. To try to make you believe that I can somehow personally benefit from all this at the cost of other holders. That simply does not hold up to scrutiny. It is a logical fallacy. If we fail, we fail together. If we succeed, this becomes one of the most remarkable stories in DeFi.
Right now, the most important thing we can do is stand firm. The external toxicity we have dealt with for so long has now seeped inside, and it is more dangerous than ever.
The only way we get through this is together. We stay united, and we keep moving forward.
We are Cedar.
Probably a good time to remind you all that Shawnte Thompson, a lady with a history of multi-million dollar lawsuits against her and her company, Brigadier Construction, including 2 active claims, has been aggressively pursuing the $1.2m in funding we assigned to develop Atlas, and my own privately owned tokens.
Cedar DAO - Some incredibly concerning information has come to light over the past 24 hours regarding interim committee member Shawnte Thompson, President of Brigadier Construction Services.
Public records indicate that both Shawnte Thompson and Brigadier Construction Services have been involved in a series of significant legal disputes spanning multiple years, including federal litigation. Notably, one case involves claims in excess of $24 million and was active during the Cedar DAO interim committee election process, yet was not disclosed at that time.
Further to this, at least two additional lawsuits have been filed against Shawnte Thompson and/or Brigadier Construction Services during her tenure on the Cedar interim committee.
Given the scale, duration, and timing of these matters, and the fact that this information was not disclosed to token holders during the election process, this raises serious questions around transparency. It also raises questions regarding the subsequent due diligence we were informed was carried out on elected members, and potential professional negligence in that process.
The absence of this information at the point of voting calls into direct question the validity and integrity of her election to the interim committee, and deprived members of the opportunity to decide whether someone with a background involving serious financial issues was an appropriate representative for a position carrying significant powers and responsibilities.
https://t.co/1hKRSuogTJ
https://t.co/1hKRSuogTJ
https://t.co/1mqAeeT1OV
https://t.co/QgjNW8UoPE
https://t.co/sGxKnjRCxL
https://t.co/yMB8ssAkss
https://t.co/uNtWaq0YRn