@anjalid2006 Maybe skip the movie tonight.
Give yourself something quieter. Dim the lights, put the phone away, and let your mind have a chance to slow down.
Some nights, the best thing to watch is the clock turning into tomorrow.
I don’t think the answer is becoming cold.
It’s learning to separate criticism from information.
If a comment helps you see something you couldn’t see yourself, keep it.
If it only makes you question yourself without giving you anything useful, let it pass.
You don’t have to learn from everything you read.
@Alex_ybuild
There’s an interesting growth loop hiding inside HumanBench.
The benchmark gets people in.
But the result is what makes people share it.
People don’t usually share a quiz.
They share what the quiz says about them.
“I’m 235B.”
“I’m MoE.”
Suddenly the result becomes content.
That content creates curiosity.
Curiosity brings the next person in.
Personalization becomes distribution without feeling like marketing.
That might be the more interesting lesson here:
The strongest growth loops give people something they actually want to show someone else.
@noahrshinn
What happens when software starts making decisions that even its owner didn’t see coming?
That’s the part of this space I find more interesting.
Once software can email, call, coordinate and act on our behalf, a different problem appears,
How do you know an action was actually yours?
At small scale, that’s a UX problem.
At millions of autonomous systems, it becomes an identity plus accountability problem.
The shift isn’t just from “AI that can act” to “AI that can act better.”
It’s from “who gave the instruction?” to “who is responsible for the action?”
That feels like the more interesting problem hiding underneath all of this.
A lot of growth looks boring while it’s happening.
You read the same problem from another angle.
You notice a small detail you ignored last month.
You change one decision.
Nothing dramatic happens.
Then, months later, you realize those tiny corrections completely changed the direction you were heading.
Progress rarely announces itself.
Sometimes it just looks like becoming a little harder to fool.
@TTrimoreau I think the real limit isn’t headcount.
It’s how much judgment one person can hold.
AI can multiply execution, but decisions, trust and accountability don’t scale the same way.
The future may not be one person doing everything.
It may be one person directing an entire machine.
#Day11 The interesting shift isn’t that businesses are using AI to answer customers faster.
It’s that they’re starting to make the experience more personal.
Remember the customer.
Understand the context.
Anticipate the next question.
Resolve the problem without making them repeat themselves.
That’s a very different experience from:
“How can I help you today?”
The next competitive advantage may not be better automation.
It may be making customers feel understood.
I’m testing something on X.
For the next 30 days, I’m going to study founders who are building in AI.
Not to copy their content.
To understand:
→ what gets attention
→ what creates conversations
→ what builds trust
→ what turns attention into opportunities
I’ll share what I find publicly.
No guru thread.
No recycled advice.
Just the experiments, observations and lessons.
Day 1 starts today.
The more work AI can do,
the more valuable judgment becomes.
Execution is getting cheaper.
But deciding,
what matters
what to ignore
what to question
what to trust
still requires context.
Maybe the future isn’t human vs. AI.
It’s,
AI does more of the work.
Humans decide what the work should be.
5M+ impressions and 40 qualified leads in a week is impressive.
But the part I find more interesting is the distinction you’re making:
attention isn’t the goal.
Turning attention into qualified conversations for founders who already have a great product and paying customers is where the real work starts.
A lot of people can manufacture reach.
The harder skill is making the right people care enough to act.
That’s where LinkedIn stops being a content channel and starts becoming a growth channel.
I want to meet more people building interesting things.
If you’re building:
→ an AI product
→ a SaaS
→ a startup
→ a personal brand
→ something completely weird that you think should exist
Tell me:
1. What are you building?
2. Who is it for?
3. What’s the hardest part right now?
I’ll read every reply.
And if I find something interesting, I’ll share my honest observation about it.
Just builders meeting builders. 🤝
@patrick_kuhnke_ Because speed was never the bottleneck.
Knowing what to do, what to ignore, and why it matters is.
AI makes execution cheaper.
Judgment makes execution count.
Sometimes being right can become the thing holding you back.
You made a decision.
It worked.
So you repeat it.
Then the situation changes.
But your mind keeps defending what worked before.
That’s where experience can quietly become a trap.
Growth requires something uncomfortable:
Being willing to update your thinking without feeling like you’ve betrayed your past self.
What worked yesterday can stop working tomorrow.
A belief that helped you start can limit you when you scale.
A strength in one environment can become a weakness in another.
The smartest move isn’t always finding a better answer.
Sometimes it’s noticing that you’re still answering a question that has already changed.
Stay curious.
Question your assumptions.
Keep moving.