Long candidates. Short candidates. Every day.
Ranked by fundamentals & Technicals,Not hype.
This is what subscribers get every morning before the open.
https://t.co/zylPXr5zjL
• Position sizing discipline beats emotional attachment.
• "Monster weightings" create concentration risk - that's portfolio management 101.
• Trimming ≠ conviction loss. It's risk management.
• But here's the thing: context matters.
• High conviction + fundamental tailwinds still intact? Reducing size might mean missing the move.
• The real question isn't "should I trim" - it's whether your thesis remains valid.
• If fundamentals haven't changed, you're just trading noise.
• Risk management isn't about guilt or pride. It's about process.
• Know the difference between disciplined rebalancing and reactive profit-taking.
@KobeissiLetter The question isn't how much is being spent on AI.
It's whether that spend creates actual shareholder value or just inflates top-line growth.
• Down 11 of 13 weeks showing clear predominant downtrend. Based on historical patterns, these typically don't last much longer than 2-3 weeks max.
• If you're fundamentally bullish, this extended downtrend (-35%) might be your accumulation window closing.
• Support confluence is interesting, but watch how analyst coverage and EPS estimates behave post-earnings. Stock price often moves opposite to estimate changes in the short term.
@PeterMallouk Spot on observation.
• Bear markets: sharp, fast, painful
• Bull markets: slower, longer, more profitable
• The asymmetry is real and measurable
• $56.4B inflow is a data point, not a strategy
• 4-week average at $40B? Check who's buying and what sectors
• Record inflows often signal late-cycle behavior
Apply common sense:
• Are these turnaround plays or quality growth?
• Compare sector fundamentals, not just headline flows
• Insider activity > retail FOMO
Bottom line:
• Money moving in doesn't mean valuations make sense
• Do the work on earnings growth, PEG ratios, and actual business quality
• Remember: biggest inflows can precede biggest corrections
Follow the methodology, not the crowd
Context matters here.
• Insider buying pace means nothing without analyzing transaction SIZE vs. total holdings
• Check if insiders are INCREASING positions or simply executing pre-planned schedules
Real question: Are the big players going ALL IN or just nibbling?
Don't confuse activity with conviction.
Interesting observation on $VIXEQ hitting 52-week highs.
Key points to consider:
• High volatility ≠ directional market prediction
• Your portfolio risk just increased significantly without you doing anything
• When volatility spikes like this, pros are likely de-risking
Critical reminder:
• Don't confuse volatility measurement with trading opportunity
In rising VIX environments, consider transitioning from portfolio building to shorter-term opportunities.
The market doesn't care about your positions when volatility doubles.
@PeterMallouk The correlation is clear, but here's what actually matters for trading:
• 98% correlation over 126 years? Great. But we're not holding for a century.
• Markets are forward-looking animals, not backward-looking spreadsheets.
Looking at $SHOP for a near-term move to $130-$136?
Here's what the methodology suggests:
• Price momentum matters more than hope
• Check if 20-day MA is crossing 60-day MA from below
• Without confirmation, you're guessing, not trading
If you're still bullish despite weak momentum:
• Consider a 1/3 or 1/2 position max
• Place bid in low $130s
• Wait for momentum confirmation before adding
• Let catalysts prove themselves first
Bottom line:
• No momentum turn = high risk entry
• Partial position only if fundamentals strongly support it
• Add on confirmation, not on thesis alone
This isn't about being right. It's about managing risk properly.