@jacksonhinkle What more can he do that he hasn't tried already when he had more ammunition and fresh forces. If he had anyway to get a win out of this mess, he would've done it. The only real option he has now is to cut his losses.
An all out assault doesn't make much sense at this point. At this point escalation that leads to the destruction of GCC oil and water infrastructure would be suicide. An Israel without adequate anti-missile defense could be decimated. How would that help them before or after elections? Either way the cost of Diesel continues to rise and accelerating that would just lead to impeachment for Trump and collapse for Israel. I don't see a good way out, it's check-mate.
The fallout from Ed Sheeran dropping Macklemore is getting spicier
VJayBombs are out there in LA projecting images of Ed massaging Jewish American billionaire Robert Kraft
Kraft is believed to be behind the campaign to get Ed to drop Macklemore for making pro-Palestinian remarks on stage
He's the owner of Gillette Stadium in Foxborough, Massachusetts, one of the venues on Ed's tour
He is also rumored to have convinced other stadium owners to force Macklemore to be removed from the tour
This story is NOT going away anytime soon
Writer: Ian
I was questioned by the Department of Homeland Security yesterday upon returning from Lebanon.
They asked me about 1 thing.
Why I posted negative things about Israeli Minister Ben Gvir.
I am a born American who lives in the United States, and they stopped me at the airport for an Israeli politician.
I’m serious.
Asmongold is wrong.
Treating migration as a pure zero-sum game is a fundamental error. Human beings are not just consumers of resources or threats to be neutralized. They are the single greatest productive resource any society has—labor, skills, entrepreneurship, ideas—if a country actually builds systems that select for contribution, enforce order, and demand integration instead of chaos.
Illegal mass crossings and the deliberate use of children as human shields are real problems. They strain welfare systems, undermine the rule of law, and create legitimate security and social cohesion risks. Pretending otherwise is naïve. But responding with “just shoot the kids, women, men—anybody” is not a serious policy position. It is an emotional tantrum that collapses the distinction between enforcement and atrocity.
That reaction is unnecessary because far more effective tools already exist or can be built: physical border control, rapid expulsion, ending catch-and-release, reforming asylum to stop abuse, and prioritizing high-skill or high-contribution legal immigration. Countries that treat human capital seriously (selective systems, work requirements, cultural assimilation expectations) extract value from people. Countries that default to either open borders or “shoot them all” waste it.
It is corrosive because once you normalize the idea that children’s lives are acceptable collateral for border policy, you lower the moral floor for everything else. Societies that talk this way stop solving problems and start manufacturing justifications for cruelty. It is also self-defeating: it hands propaganda victories to the other side, radicalizes the debate further, and makes measured enforcement politically harder, not easier.
And it is morally corrupt on the most basic level. Deterrence that requires the deliberate killing of children is not strength. It is the abandonment of the very civilization you claim to be defending. You do not protect a high-trust, high-value society by becoming the kind of people who treat children as expendable.
The correct response to disorder is competence and selective openness, not performative bloodlust.
A pedestrian, hero with a suppressed handgun, took out a demonic wound be mass killer in the act!
This will never be in the corporate News, but we the people know and will share…
@MarioNawfal Pulling any non-essential US forces and citizens out of harms way right now is prudent. If either US/Israel or Iran go on the offensive, this move will help minimize US casualties.