@LegacyProgramVP@SunOfAbramelin@JeremyCorbell Maybe you're right about that but it's irrelevant to the main point of the post:
"...in that clip Corbell was talking about the bs the ODNI official made up about what Matthew Brown said in the SCIF and told Corbell. "
You failed to address that and will now likely not respond.
@RedPandaKoala Has anyone pointed out how Lue said: "... if you can prove Clapper & I were colluding to control disclosure..."?
IT'S PROBABLY BC HE WAS COLLUDING WITH OTHERS
The bet should be whether Lue worked counter-intel on a secret UAP program
@UAPGERB@pavelibarrameda@rosscoulthart
@nic_moneypenny@AshtonForbes I assumed the "above top secret unit investigating UFOs out of the Pentagon" was AAWSAP.
I know I've heard before, possibly from Lacatski, that Elizondo did security/counter-intel for AAWSAP.
But is it possible Sheehan was talking about a different Pentagon unit? Idk.
@LueElizondo Whether Lue was in the Legacy Program depends on how you define "Legacy Program".
He was a COUNTER-INTEL in whatever program(s) he was involved with.
AATIP was not what it was portrayed as.
His mission is partial disclosure w/ a tightly controlled narrative.
That's what matters.
@RedPandaKoala If the guy took out a gun and pulled the trigger but it jammed, and the police knew this, there is no question that guy would be charged at least with attempted assault w/ a deadly weapon (or the equivalent charge in TX), irregardless of whether Patrick wanted to press charges.
@AshtonForbes Notice the shape of the RED (heat?) signature on the larger object. Maybe that is the true shape of it? -very similar to the smaller-looking object.
Also, could the dark mass in the center be something it was targeting? Red there toom
@g_knapp@The_King_Of_UFO This was obviously one big charade from the start, but the question is WHY?
Why was Bigelow used as his alleged "source"?
Why the whole Trump speech thing?
Why did this go so viral?
And what was really going on behind the scenes that this was meant to derail?
@drew4worldruler So the sun would be to the bottom left of these images, correct?
And it's headed towards the top left area in the picture?
Why do some similar images from Earth-based telescopes show a different angle?
Lacatski: "Something serious is going on. In my opinion, you all are in the middle of what I can only describe as a major and repetitive counter-intelligence operation by unknown, multiple operators or organizations. And for unknown reasons. Big question: What is so important about AAWSAP or Kona Blue? Now I used the past tense. For Kona Blue, I shouldn't be using the past tense."
(In other words, according to JL, it's still running.)
Lacatski: "What IS so important? I don't know. The public needs to answer that. In my opinion, we're all being played like a fiddle. Mainly me, because I was slow to recognize it. But there's just too much that seems to be too focused, that is just unbelievable that's being directed toward me."
@ReticulanX3@MinuteofZombie Ask Grok-
Does the following statement make sense:
"Bob didn't know isotope ratio, otherwise he would have disclosed in 89'. Decay chains should speak for themselves; alpha energy=specific proton number; gamma emissions=nuclear structure. Should be enough to id Z=115. No REF..."