Red Panda Koala

UFO News and History Documentaries 🛸 #grifter

[Red Panda Koala @RedPandaKoala]

If you appreciate my UFO News Coverage and documentaries consider supporting me on patreon or buymeacoffee!

https://t.co/VAwuiETtwk
https://t.co/AMlTbO3uYf

#ufotwitter #grifter

[Probed @ProbedSpace]

Is disclosure happening? Here's what nine months of UFO news from 52,610 posts shows.

Seven UFO file releases came out, and most of the promises tied to them were kept. Insiders and whistleblowers took the mic as Congress got quieter. The biggest moments haven't happened yet.

[Red Panda Koala @RedPandaKoala]

@GBTheWeatherMan 🙏🏽❤️

[Red Panda Koala @RedPandaKoala]

@GenomicSETI @lesliekean Very strange

[Red Panda Koala @RedPandaKoala]

James Gunn when he walked into that meeting Friday

[DiscussingFilm @DiscussingFilm]

James Gunn and Peter Safran found out that they were no longer going to be running DC Studios this past Friday.

Skydance co-CEOs David Ellison and Ynon Kreiz broke the news to them in person.

(Source: https://t.co/nhijyGDAkz)

[Finn @itcamefromorion]

Watched @The_Astral_ stream the other night and it gave me an idea.
Why don't we put all the UFO apostles on The Moment of Truth?

@tupacabra @LegacyProgramVP @RedPandaKoala
@Desmo_V4 @HighEarthOrbit_

[Kelly Chase @kellychasemedia]

On November 9, 2026, I received a letter from an attorney representing Leslie Kean concerning statements I made in two recent episodes of Inquiry. The letter raises concerns about statements regarding Leslie’s involvement in the events surrounding November 19, 2023, including the decision not to file a police report, questions about her knowledge of those events, and concerns I have expressed about how the situation was subsequently handled.

I take these concerns seriously. I have always maintained that I am willing to publicly correct any factual inaccuracies brought to my attention. I also believe that, when discussing events as serious as these, it is important to distinguish what I know firsthand, what I was told by others, what I remember, and what I have subsequently come to believe or suspect.

In that spirit, I want to clarify several points.

✅ Regarding the decision not to file a police report

In my October 30 statement, I said that multiple individuals, including Leslie Kean, were involved in convincing us not to file a police report. I want to clarify precisely what I meant.

Neither Leslie nor anyone else explicitly instructed us not to contact law enforcement. Rather, the circumstances surrounding how the incident was handled led us to believe that filing a police report would be redundant, ineffective, or unnecessary. This is the concern that I have been raising, and I believe that it is a legitimate one.

As I explained in my October 31 statement, Jay and Heather contacted Leslie for assistance in the immediate aftermath of what they believed had happened. Leslie referred them to Jonathan Grey, who, according to the accounts I received from both Jay and Heather, told them that the matter was beyond the jurisdiction or capabilities of ordinary law enforcement and was being addressed at the highest levels of the Department of Defense.

We believed that we were receiving help and protection from people who were in a position to provide it. That understanding directly influenced our decision not to pursue a police investigation at the time.

Leslie was involved in the events that created those circumstances. That is what I meant when I said she was involved in convincing us not to file a police report.

I am not alleging that Leslie intentionally sought to prevent us from reporting a crime, nor am I claiming to know that she anticipated or intended the consequences of her involvement.

I believe that people who hold positions of influence in this community have a responsibility to consider the consequences of their actions, even when those consequences are unintended. Leslie’s referral to Jonathan was part of the circumstances that influenced our understanding of the situation. I believe it is fair to ask questions about that decision and its consequences, without suggesting that she acted intentionally or unlawfully.

In an October 31, 2026 text message to me, Leslie also expressed her interest in protecting Jonathan Grey. I recognize that this is distinct from the question of what she knew or intended in 2023. Nevertheless, I believe that the role influential members of this community play in establishing trust in individuals who claim positions of authority is a legitimate subject of scrutiny.

✅ Regarding allegations of a cover-up

I have publicly expressed my suspicion that the circumstances following the incident may have involved efforts to conceal what actually happened. That suspicion developed as I received new information in 2026 that caused me to question the explanation we had been given in 2023.

My suspicions are not findings of fact. I do not know what actually occurred that night, who was responsible, or what each person involved subsequently knew or believed.

I am not asserting as an established fact that Leslie knowingly participated in a coordinated effort to conceal criminal wrongdoing. Nor am I claiming to possess evidence establishing that she acted with that intention.

What I can say is that the people we believed were helping us became involved in a series of events that, in my experience, left us without answers, without a conventional police investigation, and with an understanding of what had happened that I now have substantial reasons to question.

I believe those circumstances deserve scrutiny. Asking how and why they occurred is not the same as claiming to know everyone’s intentions.

✅ Regarding Leslie’s knowledge of the incident and our subsequent conversations

I stand by my recollection of the conversations I personally had with Leslie Kean, including our discussion in December 2023. I cannot know how significant those conversations were to Leslie at the time, but to me they were critical pieces of information at a time when I was desperately searching for answers. I am confident that I have represented those conversations honestly.

My recollection is that Leslie was aware of the reported incident and that she told me Garry Nolan had been informed of it. When Garry subsequently stated publicly that he had not known about the incident, I was understandably confused and troubled.

In my October 30 statement, I discussed the apparent contradiction between what I remembered Leslie telling me and Garry’s subsequent account, and questioned whether both accounts could be accurate.

I continue to believe that this discrepancy warrants clarification. I stand by my recollection of what Leslie told me, but I cannot independently establish why the accounts differ or what either person understood at the time. I am not claiming to have independently established that Leslie deliberately misrepresented her knowledge.

I also want to distinguish between Leslie’s knowledge of the reported incident and knowledge of what actually happened. My statements about Leslie’s awareness refer to my recollection of what she knew or was told about the incident, not to any claim that she personally witnessed the events or necessarily knew their true cause.

Leslie’s attorney has stated that she does not recall discussing the incident with me. I cannot speak to what Leslie currently remembers. I can only speak to what I remember, and I stand by that recollection.

✅ Regarding the military-abduction explanation

I also want to clarify the attribution of the explanation involving Colonel John Alexander.

As I explained in greater detail in my October 31 statement, the account relayed to me was that Jonathan Grey confirmed the military-abduction explanation during his telephone conversation with Jay and Heather.

I did not personally hear that telephone conversation, and I cannot independently verify what Jonathan said or whether the explanation was accurate.

I am not claiming that Leslie originated, fabricated, or personally communicated that explanation to me. My concern is with the explanation we were given, how it came to be accepted, and the consequences of believing it.

✅ Regarding Jonathan Grey

I have raised public questions about Jonathan Grey’s identity, credentials, role in these events, and the degree of trust the public is being asked to place in an individual whose identity and professional claims cannot readily be independently verified.

These are questions about accountability, credibility, and the protection of people who may rely on representations of authority.

I have not claimed that Leslie directed Jonathan’s actions, authorized his communications, or knew everything he said or did. I have no evidence establishing those things, and they should not be inferred from my statements.

I recognize the legitimate importance of protecting confidential journalistic sources. My questions about the verification of anonymous sources and the public’s ability to assess their credibility are not assertions that Leslie knowingly fabricated information or deliberately disregarded journalistic standards.

Based on my personal interactions with Jonathan Grey and the information available to me, I have serious questions about the accuracy of his representations concerning his identity and professional background. I believe those questions are legitimate, particularly given the authority he has reportedly claimed and the role he played in these events.

I am not seeking to expose nonpublic personal identifying information about Jonathan or to encourage anyone to endanger him. My public statements about Jonathan have concerned representations he made to me and others at Inquire Anomalous in December 2023. I have not sought to discover or publish nonpublic identifying information about him.

My questions concern the claims made about him and his involvement in events that affected us.

✅ Regarding the theatrical work mentioned in the attorney’s letter

For completeness, the letter also raises concerns about an unpublished theatrical work coauthored by Leslie Kean.

I have discussed the existence of the play, but I have never possessed its script, sought to obtain it, encouraged anyone to illegally distribute it, or threatened to publish it. I have no intention of unlawfully distributing anyone’s copyrighted work.

✅ Finally, I want to make something very clear

My purpose in coming forward has been to describe my experiences, explain what I was told, identify the circumstances that influenced my understanding of those experiences, and ask questions that remain unanswered.

I want to be precise about the distinctions between my firsthand experiences, information relayed to me by others, and the questions and concerns that have arisen as I have learned more about these events. These clarifications are intended to make my meaning explicit and to ensure that my statements are understood in their proper context.

I stand by my firsthand recollections. I am not conceding that my account of these events is false. Nor am I withdrawing my belief that there are serious questions about what happened in November 2023 and how the situation was subsequently handled.

I understand that other people may remember these events differently, may possess information I do not have, or may dispute my interpretations. I welcome verifiable information that helps establish the truth, and I remain willing to correct factual inaccuracies publicly.

There is an important difference between accusing someone of knowingly participating in wrongdoing and asking legitimate questions about their involvement in events whose consequences were profoundly serious.

I intend to maintain that distinction.

Above all, I want to understand what happened, why we were given the explanations we received, and how a situation involving allegations of serious criminal conduct came to be handled in a manner that left us believing ordinary law enforcement could offer no meaningful help.

Those questions remain unanswered.

And I believe we deserve answers.

✅ Reservation of Rights

For the avoidance of doubt, nothing in this statement, including any clarification, correction, modification, or voluntary removal of previously published content, should be construed as an admission of falsity, wrongdoing, defamation, legal liability, or agreement with any allegations or characterizations made against me.

Any decision to modify or remove content is made voluntarily and in the interest of accuracy, clarity, and responsible communication, and should not be interpreted as a concession regarding the truthfulness of my firsthand accounts or the legitimacy of the questions I have raised.

I expressly reserve all rights, claims, defenses, and remedies available to me under applicable law, including the right to pursue appropriate legal action, cooperate with law enforcement, provide evidence, and continue speaking truthfully about my own experiences and matters of legitimate public concern. Nothing in this statement is intended to waive or limit any of those rights.

[Red Panda Koala @RedPandaKoala]

@UAPSkepticEric @kellychasemedia Very telling

[Red Panda Koala @RedPandaKoala]

@VanityFair https://t.co/OiScv5GQbY

[Red Panda Koala @RedPandaKoala]

007 auditions rn

[Future Forecasting Group @TheOfficial_FFG]

"They Start Off Small. Then They Get Big Fast." He Drew Them As Five Circles

Daz Smith turned his attention to November and drew a shape instead of an event.

"It felt like it's going to be a series of four events that are going to escalate. So they start off pretty small, but then they get big fast. And here's with the big boom here, so the fourth event out of the five feels like it could be a really bad one. But it almost feels like it corrects itself or something. And then there's an after effect where it starts to recede again."

Recorded 28 October 2026. For November 2026.

🎥👇

[Red Panda Koala @RedPandaKoala]

@Only_Ryan02 Good catch yeah strange

[Red Panda Koala @RedPandaKoala]

“Jay Stratton was asked if he would participate in a (UAP) hearing.

He declined.”

Former UAPTF Head Jay Stratton declined to testifying in a new UFO Hearing, per Corbell.

Stratton is currently in the middle of a press tour promoting his new book.

[Red Panda Koala @RedPandaKoala]

https://t.co/aIJzfkzkxZ

[Red Panda Koala @RedPandaKoala]

Great audition, we just have Robert Pattinson then we will decide

[Red Panda Koala @RedPandaKoala]

007 auditions rn

[Red Panda Koala @RedPandaKoala]

@UAPConvergence That’s an optimistic way of looking at it

[Red Panda Koala @RedPandaKoala]

@BondArchives https://t.co/OiScv5GQbY

[Red Panda Koala @RedPandaKoala]

007 auditions rn

[Red Panda Koala @RedPandaKoala]

@CultureCrave https://t.co/OiScv5GQbY

[Red Panda Koala @RedPandaKoala]

007 auditions rn

[Red Panda Koala @RedPandaKoala]

Quote is at the 41 second mark

[Spaced Out Radio Official Account @SpacedOutRadio]

Sign the petition if you're #Canadian, below. Let's bring UFOs, not UAP, which are man made objects, to the public in Canada.

[Red Panda Koala @RedPandaKoala]

@AlienCommanderX @JeremyCorbell @g_knapp @MattLaslo @AskaPol_UAP @WeaponizedPod @MichaelLazovsk3 @EricBurlison @RepEricBurlison @marcorubio Thank you 🫡

[Red Panda Koala @RedPandaKoala]

@DOD_the_OG Thank you!

[Red Panda Koala @RedPandaKoala]

🚨 Midterm elections impact on UFO Disclosure

This video covers the impacts that the 2026 Midterm elections will have on UFO Disclosure and how the Democrat victories in the House and Senate and individual race results may help or hinder disclosure efforts.

We look at which UFO advocates kept their seats and which advocates lost their Senate or House seats.

0:00 intro
0:34 The big upset Mike Turner
1:56 The rest of the 2023 blockers
3:05 Who holds the gravel?
4:28 Democrat vengeance could stop White House Disclosure efforts
7:03 So who’s out?
7:50 Who survived in the House?
11:41 Who survived in the Senate?
13:27 Conclusion